Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Who is Jesus/Matthew 16:1-20.

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,038.00
Goal
$1,038.00

WalterandDebbie

Sabbath Overseer
Who is Jesus?
At the heart of Christianity is a central question, "Just who is Jesus Christ?" It may be astounding to some that such a question is still relevant after nearly two millennia of Christian activity, but as strange as it may seem, even Christians do not agree about the nature of the founder of their religion. This fact says a great deal about those who profess to be "Christian," which at its most basic means "follower of Christ." If Christians display such profound disagreement about Jesus Christ Himself, can they all really be following the same Person?

This subject becomes all the more important since, in its most common form, Christianity is proclaimed as a message about Jesus. What a person believes about Jesus, then, informs his understanding of the religion itself. We can see the result of this process in the thousands of Christian denominations in all parts of the world. While they all proclaim to be Christian, the individual sects emphasize different aspects of Jesus in their teaching. For instance:

» Baptists name themselves after Jesus' practice of baptizing converts, and they traditionally stress conformity to certain behavioral rules: no drinking, no card playing, no dancing. Jesus, to them, is a great moral Teacher.

» Pentecostals, on the other hand, call themselves after Jesus' promise of the gift of the Holy Spirit, which was fulfilled on the Feast of Pentecost after Jesus' death and resurrection. They are known for their great desire to express the gifts of the Spirit, particularly being able to speak in tongues. In other words, their Jesus is a Miracle Worker.

» Seventh-day Adventists take their name from the seventh-day Sabbath, which Jesus is plainly shown to have kept, as well as from His promise to come again. They promote Jesus as the bringer of the soon-coming rest of God.

» Methodists are so called because John Wesley emphasized a structured, methodical approach to Bible study and Christian living, teaching that believers must exercise their free will to come to Christ (as opposed to being absolutely predestined to salvation). Thus, they highlight Jesus' many commands for the individual to be actively involved in his own salvation and Christian growth.

» The Reformed Churches, descendants of the teaching of John Calvin, underscore the necessity of grace through faith in Christ, a reaction to abuses of the medieval Catholic Church's doctrine of works. In this way, they see Jesus as a gracious Redeemer.

Most denominations can be characterized—some would say caricatured—by identifying their concepts of Jesus Himself. He is Christianity's central figure, so how one views Christ determines what one believes and the religion he follows.

This confusion about Him actually began during His own life—even among those who had known Him all His life:

When He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished and said, "Where did this Man get this wisdom and these mighty works? Is this not the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas? And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this Man get all these things?" So they were offended at Him. Matthew 13:54-57

It seems that there was general disagreement in Judea over just who He was:

» When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, saying, "Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?" So they said, "Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." Matthew 16:13-14

» And when He had come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, "Who is this?" So the multitudes said, "This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee." Matthew 21:10-11

» Now some of them from Jerusalem said, "Is this not He whom they seek to kill? But look! He speaks boldly, and they say nothing to Him. Do the rulers know indeed that this is truly the Christ? However, we know where this Man is from; but when the Christ comes, no one knows where He is from." John 7:25-27

Of course, His enemies had questions about Him too:

» And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, "Who is this who speaks blasphemies? Who can forgive sins but God alone?" Luke 5:21

» And those who sat at the table with Him began to say to themselves, "Who is this who even forgives sins?" Luke 7:49

» Therefore some of the Pharisees said, "This Man is not from God, because He does not keep the Sabbath." Others said, "How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?" And there was a division among them. John 9:16

However, Matthew 16:15-17 provides us with the best starting point, confirmed by Christ Himself, in answering the question, "Who is Jesus?"

He said to [His disciples], "But who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter answered and said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven."

The God-revealed answer is that Jesus is the promised Messiah, the literal Son of the Supreme Being of all the universe. Of course, He is a great deal more than this, but these two facts are the most foundational to our spiritual understanding of this wonderful Being. They give us the basis of His relationship to us and our future, as well as His relationship to Deity, fixing Him as the bridge between man and God. From this foundation, we can begin a deeper consideration of the biblical Jesus.


Next: The Historical Jesus

Peter Confesses Jesus as the Christ
13 Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” 14 And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” 15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, cthe Son of dthe living God.” 17 And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. 18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 I will give you mthe keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” 20 Then he strictly charged the disciples to tell no one that he was the Christ.
 
Last edited:
It is Jesus's birthday.Of course it is joyous.:biggrin2

Kathi, and how are you? I was raised up to celebrate all of the old time traditions, up until about in 1983, But every since I have repented to Jesus Christ, I did not know how to accept the below questions.

What is the TRUE ORIGIN of Christmas? Where
did it come from? Did you know Jesus Christ was born
nowhere NEAR December 25, but that was the “birth
day” of the sun-god, “Sol Invictus” or “Mithras”?
Did you know December 25 was the concluding day
of the pagan winter festival called the “Saturnalia”?
Where did “Santa Claus” come from? The “Christmas
Tree”? How did this pagan feast become connected with
“Christianity”? Here is an amazing “whale of a tale”!

Although the whole world celebrates Christmas as a “Christian” holiday, including millions of non-Christians, is Christmas really “Christian” at all? Consider this fact: Look high and low throughout the pages of the Bible, and you will find not ONE WORD of “Christmas” being celebrated by any of God’s people! It is not even mentioned once! Neither Christ nor any of His apostles ever observed this holiday, nor the New Testament Church!

Yet on the other hand the pagan, heathen world observed this day for thousands of years before Christ was even born!

Where did the mysterious rites and ceremonies that surround this day come from? What about the “Christmas tree” and the “Yule log” and the mistletoe and Holly wreaths? Are ANY of these customs truly “Christian” in origin? And what about fat and jolly old “Saint Nick” – or Santa Claus?

https://www.google.com/search?clien...f Christ by William F. Dankenbring&gws_rd=ssl

http://www.triumphpro.com/when-was-jesus-really-born-revised.pdf
 
Last edited:
The God-revealed answer is that Jesus is the promised Messiah, the literal Son of the Supreme Being of all the universe. Of course, He is a great deal more than this, but these two facts are the most foundational to our spiritual understanding of this wonderful Being. They give us the basis of His relationship to us and our future, as well as His relationship to Deity, fixing Him as the bridge between man and God. From this foundation, we can begin a deeper consideration of the biblical Jesus.
This summation does not go far enough to present the Bible truth about Jesus of Nazareth to someone who may have a misunderstanding of who Jesus really is.

1. Instead of "literal Son" Scripture calls Him "the ONLY-BEGOTTEN Son" which is quite different. All the modern versions have expunged this description but the Greek word monogenes means exactly that -- only begotten or uniquely begotten. Since God is not man, any "begetting" within the Godhead is unique. What this term means is that from eternity past, there was a unique Father-Son relationship between God the Father and God the Word (Jn 1:1-3). The human mind cannot grasp this, but faith can easily grasp it.

2. The next thing to note in the above quote is that it makes absolutely no reference to the Deity of Christ. "His relationship to Deity" is not the same as the plain statement that "JESUS IS GOD". And that is what is revealed in Scripture numerous times. Indeed, we read in Colossians 1:19 and 2:9 "For it pleased the Father that in Him should ALL FULNESS dwell... For in Him dwelleth ALL THE FULNESS OF THE GODHEAD bodily"".

What is absolutely unique about Bible Christianity is that the Lord God Almighty became a Man and thereby became our Savior. There is no Cross in any other religion, and there is no Resurrection in any other religion like unto that of Christ (who is God the Word, God manifest in the flesh, the Son of God, God the Son, and the Son of Man, all at the same time).

So the real issue for Unitarians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists (not to mention all kinds of other pagans) is "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?"

If He is not God, He cannot be either Messiah or the Savior of the world, since only God Himself -- the sinless Lamb of God -- could take away the sin of the world (Jn 1:29,36; 1 Pet 1:18-20). And only God Himself could be the eternal King of Israel and Lord of this universe. This is indeed "the biblical Jesus".
 
...the individual sects emphasize different aspects of Jesus in their teaching. For instance:

» Baptists name themselves after Jesus' practice of baptizing converts, and they traditionally stress conformity to certain behavioral rules: no drinking, no card playing, no dancing. Jesus, to them, is a great moral Teacher.

» Pentecostals, on the other hand, call themselves after Jesus' promise of the gift of the Holy Spirit, which was fulfilled on the Feast of Pentecost after Jesus' death and resurrection. They are known for their great desire to express the gifts of the Spirit, particularly being able to speak in tongues. In other words, their Jesus is a Miracle Worker.

» Seventh-day Adventists take their name from the seventh-day Sabbath, which Jesus is plainly shown to have kept, as well as from His promise to come again. They promote Jesus as the bringer of the soon-coming rest of God.

» Methodists are so called because John Wesley emphasized a structured, methodical approach to Bible study and Christian living, teaching that believers must exercise their free will to come to Christ (as opposed to being absolutely predestined to salvation). Thus, they highlight Jesus' many commands for the individual to be actively involved in his own salvation and Christian growth.

» The Reformed Churches, descendants of the teaching of John Calvin, underscore the necessity of grace through faith in Christ, a reaction to abuses of the medieval Catholic Church's doctrine of works. In this way, they see Jesus as a gracious Redeemer.
I have made the observation that the problem with denominations and the divisions they produce is that they pigeon-hole some aspect of the truth instead of embracing all of them. A correct theology will embrace all of the truths of who Jesus is listed above, and perhaps more. This is why I detest the popular labels we paste on ourselves and one another. Chances are the one you throw around represents just a part of all the truth that each of us should be assimilating in our life and service to God.
 
I find it incredibly ironic that what the church does is divide itself according to personal gifting--the very thing that God gave us to bind us together, not separate us.

Those with gifts and callings in line with evangelism gravitate toward churches devoted to that one aspect of Christian life. Those with gifts and callings in line with charity gravitate toward churches devoted to that aspect of Christian life. Those with gifts and callings in line with prophecy gravitate toward churches devoted to end-times matters. Those with gifts and calling in line with the supernatural gifts gravitate toward churches devoted to those things.

What God intended was that we all fellowship together so that we all have the benefit of another's insights and giftings and knowledge in a particular area. Instead, we have pastors and church leaders who establish churches devoted to their single expertise.

Now what we have is a church that beats each other up insisting they need to be doing what our church/leadership is doing and emphasizing.
 
This summation does not go far enough to present the Bible truth about Jesus of Nazareth to someone who may have a misunderstanding of who Jesus really is.

1. Instead of "literal Son" Scripture calls Him "the ONLY-BEGOTTEN Son" which is quite different. All the modern versions have expunged this description but the Greek word monogenes means exactly that -- only begotten or uniquely begotten. Since God is not man, any "begetting" within the Godhead is unique. What this term means is that from eternity past, there was a unique Father-Son relationship between God the Father and God the Word (Jn 1:1-3). The human mind cannot grasp this, but faith can easily grasp it.

2. The next thing to note in the above quote is that it makes absolutely no reference to the Deity of Christ. "His relationship to Deity" is not the same as the plain statement that "JESUS IS GOD". And that is what is revealed in Scripture numerous times. Indeed, we read in Colossians 1:19 and 2:9 "For it pleased the Father that in Him should ALL FULNESS dwell... For in Him dwelleth ALL THE FULNESS OF THE GODHEAD bodily"".

What is absolutely unique about Bible Christianity is that the Lord God Almighty became a Man and thereby became our Savior. There is no Cross in any other religion, and there is no Resurrection in any other religion like unto that of Christ (who is God the Word, God manifest in the flesh, the Son of God, God the Son, and the Son of Man, all at the same time).

So the real issue for Unitarians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists (not to mention all kinds of other pagans) is "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?"

If He is not God, He cannot be either Messiah or the Savior of the world, since only God Himself -- the sinless Lamb of God -- could take away the sin of the world (Jn 1:29,36; 1 Pet 1:18-20). And only God Himself could be the eternal King of Israel and Lord of this universe. This is indeed "the biblical Jesus".

Luke 4:1-13King James Version (KJV)

4 And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,

2 Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered.

3 And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.

4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

9 And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence:

10 For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee:

11 And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

12 And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

13 And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.

https://www.google.com/search?clien...was+in+him+reconciling+the+world+unto+himself

http://biblehub.com/mark/5-7.htm
 
Last edited:
I find it incredibly ironic that what the church does is divide itself according to personal gifting--the very thing that God gave us to bind us together, not separate us.

Those with gifts and callings in line with evangelism gravitate toward churches devoted to that one aspect of Christian life. Those with gifts and callings in line with charity gravitate toward churches devoted to that aspect of Christian life. Those with gifts and callings in line with prophecy gravitate toward churches devoted to end-times matters. Those with gifts and calling in line with the supernatural gifts gravitate toward churches devoted to those things.

What God intended was that we all fellowship together so that we all have the benefit of another's insights and giftings and knowledge in a particular area. Instead, we have pastors and church leaders who establish churches devoted to their single expertise.

Now what we have is a church that beats each other up insisting they need to be doing what our church/leadership is doing and emphasizing.

That we should speak the same thing, in and out seasons:

https://www.google.com/search?clien...hat we should speak the same thing&gws_rd=ssl
 
So the real issue for Unitarians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists (not to mention all kinds of other pagans) is "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?"

If He is not God, He cannot be either Messiah or the Savior of the world, since only God Himself -- the sinless Lamb of God -- could take away the sin of the world (Jn 1:29,36; 1 Pet 1:18-20). And only God Himself could be the eternal King of Israel and Lord of this universe. This is indeed "the biblical Jesus".

How can God be the Messiah if the Messiah is anointed by God?

Why can't God appoint His Son to be the Savior of the world?

How can God be the "sinless Lamb of God" if the word "of" shows possession? Yeshua is the Lamb belonging to God.

The sinless Lamb of God died. How can an immortal God die?

The "eternal King" is Yahweh, Yeshua's Father.

When you say, "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?", do you mean that he is God as his Father is God or do you mean he is an elohim (god) as were the other mighty men of Israel (Psalm 82:6)? I believe Scripture teaches the latter.
 
How can God be the Messiah if the Messiah is anointed by God?

Why can't God appoint His Son to be the Savior of the world?

How can God be the "sinless Lamb of God" if the word "of" shows possession? Yeshua is the Lamb belonging to God.

The sinless Lamb of God died. How can an immortal God die?

The "eternal King" is Yahweh, Yeshua's Father.

When you say, "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?", do you mean that he is God as his Father is God or do you mean he is an elohim (god) as were the other mighty men of Israel (Psalm 82:6)? I believe Scripture teaches the latter.

So Jesus said to those Jews who had believed in Him, If you abide in My word [hold fast to My teachings and live in accordance with them], you are truly My disciples. We should speak the same thing.
https://www.google.com/search?clien...el=t26&q=If ye continue in my word&gws_rd=ssl

https://www.google.com/search?clien...&q=We should speak the same thing.&gws_rd=ssl
 
Last edited:
How can God be the Messiah if the Messiah is anointed by God?
That is the beauty and the mystery of God. We need to keep in mind that God the Word (Jn 1:1-3) willingly and voluntarily took human form to become the Messiah and the Savior (Heb 10:5-14). Only God in human form could pay for the sins of the world (Acts 20:28). No angel and no human being could do that. [Please use the KJV for these quotations to avoid discrepancies because of versions].

Why can't God appoint His Son to be the Savior of the world?
God the Father did indeed appoint God the Son to be the Savior of the world (1 Jn 2:1,2). He has also appointed Him to be the Judge of the world (Acts 17:31).

How can God be the "sinless Lamb of God" if the word "of" shows possession? Yeshua is the Lamb belonging to God.
Once again, the puzzle is easily resolved when you acknowledge that God the Father apppointed God the Son to be the Lamb of God (1 Pet 1:18-20). Christ was totally submitted to the will of the Father, and went to the Cross as a lamb to the slaughter (Isa 53:1-12).

The sinless Lamb of God died. How can an immortal God die?
Because Christ was the Son of God and the Son of Man at the same time. He was fully human and fully divine. And that is called "the Mystery of Godliness" (1 Tim 3:16)

The "eternal King" is Yahweh, Yeshua's Father.
The eternal King is also the Lord Jesus Christ. Once again, this is the "mystery of God" which we dare not "explain" but simply believe. See Isaiah 6:1-5 and then see John 12:37-45 (where Jesus says "He that seeth me seeth Him that sent me"). John says (Jn 12:41) that Isaiah saw Christ's glory. And what we read in Isaiah's prophecy is "For mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD [YHWH]of hosts" (Isa 6:5).

When you say, "Will you believe that JESUS IS GOD?", do you mean that he is God as his Father is God or do you mean he is an elohim (god) as were the other mighty men of Israel (Psalm 82:6)? I believe Scripture teaches the latter.
Jesus is fully God (Theos), just as the Father is fully God (Theos). Please note carefully how God the Father addresses God the Son (Heb 1:8-10):
8But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God [Theos], is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
9Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God [Theos], even thy God [Theos], hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
10And, Thou, Lord [Kurios], in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: [This last verse is a quotation from Psalm 102:24-27 where it quite clear that God is being addressed].

But Christian truth is not polytheistic. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are one God, eternally existent as three Divine Persons. Hence Christian baptism is "In the Name [singular] of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" (Mt 28:19). One Name [YHWH] three Persons, all in the Godhead (1 Jn 5:7).
 
That is the beauty and the mystery of God. We need to keep in mind that God the Word (Jn 1:1-3) willingly and voluntarily took human form to become the Messiah and the Savior (Heb 10:5-14). Only God in human form could pay for the sins of the world (Acts 20:28). No angel and no human being could do that. [Please use the KJV for these quotations to avoid discrepancies because of versions].

I believe you are reading Yeshua into the text of John 1:1-4. English Bibles that preceded the KJV read the word to be an “it”, not a “him”.

God the Father did indeed appoint God the Son to be the Savior of the world (1 Jn 2:1,2). He has also appointed Him to be the Judge of the world (Acts 17:31).

1Jn 2:1 says, “Yeshua Messiah”, not “God the Son”. Acts 17:31 says an ordained “man” will judge, not “God the Son”.

Once again, the puzzle is easily resolved when you acknowledge that God the Father apppointed God the Son to be the Lamb of God (1 Pet 1:18-20). Christ was totally submitted to the will of the Father, and went to the Cross as a lamb to the slaughter (Isa 53:1-12).

I don’t see “God the Son” in 1Pe 1:18-20.

Because Christ was the Son of God and the Son of Man at the same time. He was fully human and fully divine. And that is called "the Mystery of Godliness" (1 Tim 3:16)

I believe the KJV reading is questionable. Bruce Metzger wrote:

[“He who”] is supported by the earliest and best uncials…no uncial (in the first hand) earlier than the eighth or ninth century supports theos; all ancient versions presuppose hosor ho[“he who” or “he”]; and no patristic writer prior to the last third of the fourth century testifies to the reading theos. The reading theosarose either (a) accidentally, or (b)deliberately, either to supply a substantive for the following six verbs [the six verbs that follow in the verse], or, with less probability, to provide greater dogmatic precision [i.e., to produce a verse that more clearly supports the Trinitarian position].”​

The eternal King is also the Lord Jesus Christ. Once again, this is the "mystery of God" which we dare not "explain" but simply believe. See Isaiah 6:1-5 and then see John 12:37-45 (where Jesus says "He that seeth me seeth Him that sent me"). John says (Jn 12:41) that Isaiah saw Christ's glory. And what we read in Isaiah's prophecy is "For mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD [YHWH]of hosts" (Isa 6:5).

A superficial reading leads one to believe that the "his" and "him" of verse 41 refers to Yeshua and ties in with verse 37. For the sake of clarity these verses will be printed out with [brackets] designating the speaker. Jn.12:37,38, "But though he [Yeshua] had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on him [Yeshua]: That the saying of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he [Isaiah] spake, Lord, 'who hath believed our report? and to whom hath the arm of the Yahweh been revealed?' (The underlined is a quote from Is.53:1. The "arm of Yahweh" is Isaiah's reference to the Messiah). The passage continues with verses 39-41; "Therefore they could not believe, because that Isaiah said again, 'He [Yahweh] hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I [Yahweh] should heal them.' These things said Isaiah, when he [Isaiah] saw his [Yahweh's] glory, and spake of him [Yahweh]." Verse 40 (underlined) is a quote from Is.6:10. John is quoting a second passage from Isaiah to show why they could not believe on Yeshua; because Yahweh blinded them. Verse 41 therefore, is referring to Is.6:10, not Is.53:1. In Is.6:1-3 Yahweh is seen in all His glory. That is the glory referred to in verse 41. It was not Yeshua's glory.


Hebrews 1:8-9 is quoting Psalm 45:6-7 where “elohim” is used. “Elohim” can refer to Yahweh, angels or men. When it refers to men as in Psalm 82:6, it is rendered “gods” or “elohim”. When it refers to the Father it is rendered “God” or “Elohim”. I believe it should be rendered "god" or "elohim" when referring to Yeshua.

Hebrews 1:10 are the words of an afflicted man crying out to Yahweh. They are not Yahweh’s words to His Son.
 
Back
Top