Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

C.S. Lewis the Devil's wisest fool

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,038.00
Goal
$1,038.00
S

Soma-Sight

Guest
http://www.balaams-ass.com/journal/homemake/cslewis.htm

John F. Kennedy, C.S. Lewis, and Aldous Huxley all died on the same day.

They all went to the same place.
Kennedy went to hell because he trusted in the Roman Whore.
Huxley went to hell because he trusted in himself alone and his hybrid Eastern mystic notions.
And, Lewis went to hell because he invented a new god, and he ended his life a Taoist.
We will prove it here.

 
Clive Staples Lewis has been perhaps the single most useful tool of Satan since his appearance in the Christian community sometime around World War II. With his strong belief in non-denominational Christianity, which he termed "mere Christianity", and his apparent orthodoxy in doctrine, the influence of his pen has reached across many years. When the light of God's Holy Bible is focused upon his writings, however, his heresy and outright love of Satan comes into bold focus.

Though a highly acclaimed and widely published "Christian" author, when judged by his own words with the King James Bible it becomes clear that he was indeed a fool in the most extreme sense of the word, yet a very subtle one that was and is extremely useful to his father the devil.

 
I can't say that I agree with everything the man says but a servant who embraces Satan?

Come on, Soma.

I suggest you start presenting your evidence instead of generalizing.
 
LOL
Part time piano teacher, part time hydrophobic Theologian.

He writes in between bouts of snake-handling.
 
With such status I would expect to see his name in the Bible. I don't. Or are you calling him the anti-christ? More opinions and people thinking they can tell us who is and isn't in hell. I'll leave that to God almighty since I don't think any many has the ability to judge the hearts and minds of men.
 
I can't say that I agree with everything the man says but a servant who embraces Satan?

Come on, Soma.

I suggest you start presenting your evidence instead of generalizing.

If Christians are going to demonize Harry Potter, sorcery, and the fantasy genre in general as being "Satanic"....

Then Narnia is NO exception to this rule!


Their are wizards, magic, mysticism, witches, etc, etc, JUST like in Harry Potter???????!!!!!! :o

Where is the logic here?

That website I presented gives a Biblical case of the ungodly Fruit of CS Lewis.....

How do you condemn Potter and hold Narnia up?

For the record I dont wholeheartedly believe all I post but enjoy the dialogue. :bday:
 
Congratulations on being a complete ***.


Soma-Sight said:
http://www.balaams-ass.com/journal/homemake/cslewis.htm

John F. Kennedy, C.S. Lewis, and Aldous Huxley all died on the same day.

They all went to the same place.
Kennedy went to hell because he trusted in the Roman Whore.
Huxley went to hell because he trusted in himself alone and his hybrid Eastern mystic notions.
And, Lewis went to hell because he invented a new god, and he ended his life a Taoist.
We will prove it here.

 
I'm likin' you more and more, Vic. Funny how logic seems to do that.

As for Soma, I read through a page and a half of that site, and I don't see how anything on that page refutes what Lewis was trying to do. Since when does pondering on the words of God mean you're a work of the devil? Psalms 5:21 - "For the ways of man are before the eyes of the LORD, and he pondereth all his goings." So, is it wrong that God's pondering the ways of man and all things, and it's also wrong for man to ponder on the things of God? I thought a constant study of his words was kind of what He wanted. No?

It also said that Lewis became a Christian to ease relations with his friends. Or was it that God softened the hearts of his friends to Lewis? I've seen people become Christians, then get persecuted for doing so. It's bad that Lewis made friends through Christianity? If every new Christian that made friends after becoming one was helped to feel more at ease with Christianity, then I'm sure there would be a lot more Christians. I've seen people out here on my campus walking around with giant signs saying "Confess your sins or go to hell." Then these people would tell even Christians that they were going to hell for what they believed. After telling these people that you believed in Christ, they still said you were lost and were going to burn in hell for your sins. If you can't even count on other Christians for support, who can you count on? Ooh, I know: God. But you have to understand how God wants things done, so you have to study and ponder on what it is you need to do. Hmm, I think I covered this one in the last paragraph, maybe?

Anyway, there's only so much false writing I can stomach. I love C.S. Lewis' works. I'm reading as much of him as I can without getting behind on school work and other reading. I've read "The Great Divorce" three times and it just keeps getting better. It's great stuff. It's too bad Satan's workin' double time to try and make a Christian genius a work of his own.
 
Wow that was completely ridiculous.

OK,

I would like to bring out the real girth and "meat" of the purpose of this post.....

How can you let Narnia off the hook when you condemn Harry Potter..???

Both are fantasy epics that deal with magic, wizards and the like.....

The difference is the storyline.... that is all.... Potter is no different than Narnia.....

Where and how do you draw the line here????
 
The line dealing with the occult is far beyond Harry Potter and even further beyond Narnia. When you start to truely believe that you can wave a wand and turn things into something. Narnia and Harry Potter are not the work of Satan trying to draw souls to him. They're fantasy, plain and simple. I loved the Narnia series as a kid and Harry Potter just looks stupid, so I haven't even read it, but it's a fantasy tale, and that is all.
 
Stejaka,

I see your point....

But what about this...

The line dealing with the occult is far beyond Harry Potter and even further beyond Narnia. When you start to truely believe that you can wave a wand and turn things into something.

How is "waving my wand around" to get a storm to come or some other effect ANY different that "calling upon the Holy Spirit" to cure an ailment or help the Phllidelphia Eagles win the Superbowl??????

Do you see the problem here?

Prayer and calling on God are the same thing as magic just a different mechanism to get the same results!
 
No. People who call upon magic are obviously not calling on God. Hence their use of the whole "magic" term. I'm really not certain why you are suggesting they are the same. And either way, the Bible makes it clear that praying is the way to go. Magic simply does not exist.

That being said, praying for ones team to win a Superbowl is wrong for a whole different reason.
 
No. People who call upon magic are obviously not calling on God. Hence their use of the whole "magic" term. I'm really not certain why you are suggesting they are the same. And either way, the Bible makes it clear that praying is the way to go. Magic simply does not exist.

Prayer and magic are both mechanisms that seek to control nature through supernatural methods....

The difference is in the words and the intent...

That is how I look at it...

Drawing the line between magic "superstitiion" and prayer "authentic access to God's mind" is the tricky part....
 
I'm not sure I see how. It seems to me prayer and magic are too very different mechanisms. Could you explain further? :-?
 
Muad'Dib said:
No. People who call upon magic are obviously not calling on God. Hence their use of the whole "magic" term. I'm really not certain why you are suggesting they are the same. And either way, the Bible makes it clear that praying is the way to go. Magic simply does not exist.

That being said, praying for ones team to win a Superbowl is wrong for a whole different reason.

Listen to the man, Soma-Sight. He took the words right out of my mouth.

The difference between prayer and magic is that prayer works and magic does not. I'm not sure how one condemns something that doesn't exist. You can condemn werewolves and vampires all you wish, but you'd just be wasting your breath. Same goes for magic. You can't fight something that's not there.
 
Soma-Sight said:
How can you let Narnia off the hook when you condemn Harry Potter..???

Both are fantasy epics that deal with magic, wizards and the like.....

The difference is the storyline.... that is all.... Potter is no different than Narnia.....

Where and how do you draw the line here????

I have not problem with Harry Potter, however; there is a difference between Narnia and Potter books. For one Narnia is purposefully an allegory to the Bible. Also Potter often breaks rules and does not get punished for themâ€â€he is rewarded for them (Of course I am really only noting what I have seen in the movies considering I have never read any Harry Potter books).
 
People draw the magic line at odd places. For example, Harry Potter is bad, but Wizard of Oz is good. Lord of the Rings is bad but Grimm fairy tales are good. Talking rabbits and ducks are bad and talking vegatables are good.

Quath
 
Quath said:
People draw the magic line at odd places. For example, Harry Potter is bad, but Wizard of Oz is good. Lord of the Rings is bad but Grimm fairy tales are good. Talking rabbits and ducks are bad and talking vegatables are good.

Quath
So true.
 
Back
Top