Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

[_ Old Earth _] Creation vs. Evolution

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$905.00
Goal
$1,038.00
Yeah, yeah, yeah...

The creation fundamentalists will change Gen 5:2 just the way you say.

But the point of the Theistic Evolutionists is that Gen 5:2 clearly says in the KJV that this man and women represent a species which is a foundtion for all other claims about the 22 now extinct humans right for the literal text of the Bible, itself.


Another false appeal to authority.

Theistic evolution proponents endorse no such position.

There are no other claims about 22 species. That's your private and solely held position.
 
Another false appeal to authority.

Theistic evolution proponents endorse no such position.

There are no other claims about 22 species. That's your private and solely held position.




In your own long list of possible extinct humans and those other species that are just Apes,y ou listed the names of the same 22 species which appear on the graphic below:



Adamcain.jpg




Book:

Capture.JPG




The Last Human: A Guide to Twenty-TwoSpecies of Extinct Humans

by G.J.Sawyer, (Author)



sethNoah.jpg




Here are YOUR own references, number by you:


1.Homo sapiens………………………………………(Shem, Ham, Japheth)
2.Homosapiensidaltu………………………………(Noah) Homo sapiens idaltu is an extinct subspecies of Homo sapiens that lived almost 160,000 years ago in Pleistocene Africa.[1] Idaltu is from the Saho-Afar word meaning "elder or first born". (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
4.Homo ergaster……………………………………..(Methusael)

6.Homo antecessor………………………………(Lamech 2)
7.Homoheidelbergensis………………………….(Jabal)
8.Homo neanderthalensis…………………….(Jubal)
10.Homo erectus…………………………………..(Methuselah)
11.Homohabilis…………………………………..(Enoch2)
12.Homorudolfensis………………………………(Jared)
13.Homo floresiensis……………………………….(Tubal-cain)

25.Australopithecus anamensis…………………(Seth)

28.Australopithecus africanus ……………………(Enos)
29.Australopithecusafarensis……………………..(Enoch)
30.Australopithecusgarhi………………………….(Mahalaleel)
31.Australopithecusaethiopicus…………………(Cainan)
32.Australopithecusrobustus……………………..(Mahujael)
33.Australopithecusboisei………………………….(Irad)
34.Ardipithecus ramidus………………………….(Cain)
37. Sahelanthropus tchadensis………………………………….(Adam)
38. Orrorin tugenensis…………………………………………… (Abel)
Orrorintugenensis is considered to be thesecond-oldest (after Sahelanthropus tchadensis) known homininancestor that is possibly related to modern humans, and it is the only speciesclassified in genus Orrorin. Orrorin is significant because it can be an earlybipedal hominin.

 
You can't strawman me here.

These 22 apes, along with the others that I listed, are accepted. However, there is no one endorsing and definitely not "insisting" that there are only 22, which was the claim you made that I am addressing.

That is a deception on your part, every time you claim it.




As well, I see that you are trying to say that the more modern hominids are "just apes."

You have no intellectual integrity if you are going this route to try to say that the species that evolved from our cousins are "just apes" when you are going to count the less evolved from you list as being related to us.
 
Back
Top