Did Man Walk With Dinosaurs?

Discussion in 'Christian History' started by Lewis, Jul 9, 2009.

  1. Grazer

    Grazer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,955
    Christian:
    Yes
    So was the earth being at the centre of the universe and being flat. The crucial and most relevant point is that they are now no longer taken seriously.
     
  2. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    Sorry. I thought you meant they were legit.
     
  3. reba

    reba Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2010
    Messages:
    45,860
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Christian:
    Yes
    Science and facts do not go hand in hand. Some of what was a fact of science thousands of years ago is not a fact today. This is even true in my lifetime...
     
  4. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    Carbon 14 is used on organic matter, such as fossils, bones, coal or diamonds; whereas uranium dating is used on inorganic matter, such as igneous rocks, metamorphic rocks and some sedimentary rocks.

    A few websites that show supportive evidence of my claim about Carbon 14 in dinosaur bones are found in the following links:



    I hope this helps,


    Tri
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2012
  5. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    The pyramids were built after the flood, and they contain post-flood specimens. The dinosaurs and mega fauna died in the flood. Many of their bones were covered in 100's of meters of ash from erupting volcanoes, which is generally the only way to get a fossil. (Volcanic ash also preserved Pompeii and the Minoan civilisation). For a bone to become fossilised it needs to be starved of moisture and oxygen; otherwise it will decompose. All existing fossils were formed during a cataclysmic event. Even the bones of the American Buffalo's from the great 18th century kills have turned to dust because they were exposed to the elements. Bones will normally decompose quickly unless there is some unusual event that buries the bones away from moisture and oxygen. Most of the mountains that we see today were caused by the volcanic action that took place during the flood. The mid-ocean ridge, for instance, is the largest range on earth. It is over 70,000 kms long. It was formed during the flood which caused continental "drift". The dinosaurs and mega fauna died in this explosive volcanic activity that accompanied the flood.



    These footprints have been authenticated.

    http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2012
  6. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    Um...whoo boy.

    Where to start.

    There are actually several ways to get a fossil and some involve liquids.
    I don't know where you got this idea that volcanic ash is required and is the only way to form a fossil.

    I've read up about the Glen Rose and Paluxy footprints and they do not hold up to scrutiny.
    And one of the sites you gave a link to shows that they HAVN'T been authenticated.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2012
  7. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    That is your opinion. We all belong to faiths. I belong to the Christian faith, and you belong to the evolution faith. Both sides can at times be quite blind to facts and data. Both sides presume to know the truth. This is the reality. You will never accept evidence that I accept; and I will not believe much of the evidence that you accept. We both belong to a faith that we religously uphold. I am not in denial of my faith; you are.

    Question... how does a bone not decompose when exposed to moisture and oxidisation for millions of years? Why do bones decompose rapidly that have been recently buried, whereas bones that are "millions of years old" do not decompse?
     
  8. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No

    Sigh. Evolution is not a faith. I don't let evolution colour my worldview. And it's not just my opinion. It's the opinion of the scientific community. And I don't take their findings on faith. I take it on trust.

    And you really don't understand what a fossil is. The wikipedia entry on fossil formation and the various methods fossilization/preservation takes place is a pretty good, if brief, guide to the various processes. Check it out. :thumbsup
     
  9. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    Evolution is a faith - you need more faith for evolution than you do for creation. You have just been fooled. You don't understand fossilisation either. Answer my questions if you do:

    • how does a bone not decompose when exposed to moisture and oxidisation for millions of years?
    • Why do bones decompose rapidly that have been recently buried, whereas bones that are "millions of years old" do not decompose?
    Give the sighs a rest.
     
  10. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    How lazy.

    Ok. To address your first question. Have you heard of bog bodies? Humans and animals falling or intentionally thrown into pete bogs are preserved remarkably. We can even see the expressions on their face and fine details like clothing are preserved. Theres water but but it's very cold. Add to this the anaerobic conditions and acidic nature of the pete and it preserves extremely well over the millenia.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2012
  11. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    The following material is taken from: http://www.earthage.org/youngearthev/evidence_for_a_young_earth.htm

    Note that the outer part of the bone was calcified and had access to moisture and oxygen. The bones were still fossilised though; so the sedimentary rock, consisting of sand and ash and other debris, resisted moisture and oxygen until the bones were fossilised. The bones were buried in deep layers of sand and debri that were dumped instantaneously onto the bones, preventing moisture to be admitted (otherwise they would have completely decayed). The question is the same. How did millions of tons of sand come to be dumped onto the bones at one time, preventing moisture to infiltrate and decay the bones? Like the volcanic ash, this was a cataclysmic event.
     
  12. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    These "bog bodies" are not millions of years old; unless you are suggesting mankind was here millions of years ago. The bog bodies were 3000 years old tops, and they were not fossilised, they were mummified. Excellent research!!!
     
  13. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    There are no unfossilized dinosaur bones.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 27, 2012
  14. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    Really?



    The sources are provided in full on the website. You just have not researched the topic as much as you make out. That is what blind faith does to a person... Christians can be guilty of this too - but evolutionists are just as guilty.
     
  15. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    It was just an example off the top of my head in which moisture being present can lead to preservation of bone.

    I only gave it because there are no unfossilized dinosaur bones to give an example of.
     
  16. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    We both seek evidence to support our faith. I'm not trying to change your faith. You are welcome to it. I hope it gives you much happiness and security.
     
  17. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    I am aware of the discovery and there is still no consensus on whether it is a legitimate find or not. Some studies support it and some contradict it.
     
  18. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    This is the same reasoning that is used to deny all creation evidence. In the end a person believes, not by evidence, but by faith.
     
  19. AlexBC

    AlexBC  

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Christian:
    No
    Unless you're a scientist.

    Anyway. Why aren't we finding other examples of preserved dino tissue if the bones are as young as you believe? And not just one example that is contested by many reputable molecular biologists etc?
     
  20. Tri Unity

    Tri Unity Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Christian:
    Yes
    Scientists present a hypothesis (a belief), and they seek evidence that will prove or disprove that belief before it becomes elevated to a theory. The evidence a scientist will accept does not mean that it is beyond question. Scientists disagree among themselves on almost every hypothesis and theory. The history of quantum mechanics and particle physics is a history of wars among scientists who strongly opposed each other.

    There have been other examples found of soft tissue preserved in "ancient fossils":

    http://naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/fossilizeddna.html

    Hope this helps

    Tri
     

Share This Page