Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Differing opinions regarding salvation, Mary, and the word "save. Are there?

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,048.00
Goal
$1,038.00
Friends, Are there differing opinions regarding salvation (soteriology) in Christ, Mary, and the word "save"? It is clear from the Bible: There is only one Saviour: God: Father, Son, and Spirit, especially the Son, Jesus Christ. One Mediator only between God and men: the man Christ the LORD. But are there many intercessors (prayers) through the Lord God? Yes!

From Fr. Peter E. Gillquist: "Mary and Salvation "Near the end of the Vespers service in the Orthodox Church, the officiant says, "O holy Mother of God, save us". Can Mary really save us? Yes, and here is why.
"Certainly we believe that Mary is pure and holy, that she rules with Christ, that she even prays for us. We know that Mary relinquished her will to the will of God, thus cooperating fully with the purpose of God. And we know that it is the express purpose of God to save those who have faith in Christ. At the very least we can say that Mary is concerned about our salvation and that she desires it. That should be true of all believers.
"So the original question, "Can Mary save us?" leads to another question: "Can we save others?" Again, the Holy Scriptures speak with resounding clarity. Here are some examples.
Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things; for as you do this, you will save both yourself and those who hear you. (1 Timothy 4:16)
Let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins. (James 5:20)
And on some have compassion, making a distinction; but others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire. (Jude 22-23) [All Scriptures in Gillquist, NKJV, unless otherwise noted].
"Fire saves (1 Corinthians 3:!5); prayer saves (James 5:15); angels save (Isaiah 63:9); baptism saves (1 Peter 3:21), preaching saves (1 Corinthians 1:21); the Apostle Paul saves (Romans 11:14).
"New life in Christ, or salvation, is both personal union with him and an incorporation into the wholeness of the Body, the Church. Salvation is a Church affair, a Church concern, because we are all affected by it. Therefore, in Christ we all have a part to play in the corporate nature of His saving act.
"We do not save alone; Mary does not save alone. Jesus Christ is our wellspring of salvation. he said, "Without Me you can do nothing" (John 15:4). And "If you abide in Me, and My words abide in you, you will ask what you desire, and it shall be done for you" (John 15:7).
"Mary has a unique role in our salvation because she provided the body of Christ and thereby became the "mother" of all those who would be saved. That is why Jesus, while on the Cross, said to His mother, "Woman, behold your son!" and then said to Saint John, "Behold your mother!" (John 19:26,27). Understood in this way, does the Mother of God save us? That God, yes!

"Changing Our Mind About Mary
"Many Christians have been grossly misinformed in the last 150 years concerning the historical Church's view of Mary. We have forgotten she is favored by the Father, and is the model for you and me -- indeed, the flagship of all humanity. She was the only one who have her flesh to the Son of God, and she is uniquely to be "blessed throughout all generations" (Luke 1:48).
"What we do about Mary is connected directly to what we do about the Church. The community of Christ's followers is called to act together. Taking action with regard to Mary is not simply personal or private; it has to do with responding as the Church". [BECOMING ORTHODOX: A Journey to the Ancient Christian Faith. by Peter E. Gillquist, Copyright 1989, Wolgemuth & Hyatt Publishers, Brentwood, TN; pp. 120-121., q.v.].


Some of you may disagree with this. It is part of life if we have differences.
What needs to be said that much disagreement is based upon misunderstanding of Mary and who she really is, how much she gave her all to God, and had all her love to her Son, and so did not have to give her flesh in love to St. Joseph.
The Church has always understood this; sectarians misinterpret the Scriptures (in Matthew 1:25 and other places) on this, as they do on Romans 3:28 and Ephesians 2:8-9, and many other places, some of them, especially the teaching among many today on pre tribulation rapture. In Erie Scott Harrington
 
"Changing Our Mind About Mary
"Many Christians have been grossly misinformed in the last 150 years concerning the historical Church's view of Mary. We have forgotten she is favored by the Father, and is the model for you and me -- indeed, the flagship of all humanity. She was the only one who have her flesh to the Son of God, and she is uniquely to be "blessed throughout all generations" (Luke 1:48).
"What we do about Mary is connected directly to what we do about the Church. The community of Christ's followers is called to act together. Taking action with regard to Mary is not simply personal or private; it has to do with responding as the Church". [BECOMING ORTHODOX: A Journey to the Ancient Christian Faith. by Peter E. Gillquist, Copyright 1989, Wolgemuth & Hyatt Publishers, Brentwood, TN; pp. 120-121., q.v.].

Many people hold her far too high. "Flagship of all humanity"? LOL!


Some of you may disagree with this. It is part of life if we have differences.
What needs to be said that much disagreement is based upon misunderstanding of Mary and who she really is, how much she gave her all to God, and had all her love to her Son, and so did not have to give her flesh in love to St. Joseph.
The Church has always understood this; sectarians misinterpret the Scriptures (in Matthew 1:25 and other places) on this, as they do on Romans 3:28 and Ephesians 2:8-9, and many other places, some of them, especially the teaching among many today on pre tribulation rapture. In Erie Scott Harrington

Mary was a normal woman and proper wife to Joseph. You relegate Joseph to some unfulfilled, sexually frustrated man. They had a normal human marital relationship and provided other children, so that Jesus knew FAMILY LIFE.

There is no need for disagreement but there is a monolithic stronghold of error in the world today claiming to be the one true church, but it isn't.
 
Re: Mary is a wonderous picture of salvation through Christ Jesus !

Mary was a normal woman and proper wife to Joseph. You relegate Joseph to some unfulfilled, sexually frustrated man. They had a normal human marital relationship and provided other children, so that Jesus knew FAMILY LIFE.

There is no need for disagreement but there is a monolithic stronghold of error in the world today claiming to be the one true church, but it isn't.

I'll add an AMEN to this and would also add that Mary is a wonderful picture and example of every believing Christian.

Mary believed the message which came from above through the messenger... and because of her believing that truth from above she had Christ conceived in her earthen vessel by the power of the Holy Spirit... it's the same thing which happens spiritually to every Christian, they hear the message from above (the gospel concerning His Son), and after they believe it, God seals us with the Holy Spirit of promise which is Christ in you, our hope of glory !

Mary had Christ in her in a physical way, and Christians have Christ within their earthen vessel in a spiritual way... yet it happens the same way... by believing the message from above and then God does the rest, birthing Christ in us.
 
The idolization of Mary is one of the Catholic traditions I disagree with.
 
The idolization of Mary is one of the Catholic traditions I disagree with.

We don't "idolize" her. However, I have found the teachings of the Church when it compares Mary as a microcosm to the Church, the Body of Believers purified by God (found in Scriptures), I find it quite profound. The point of "Marian doctrine" is to lead us to her Son.

"Do whatever He tells you"...

Mary at Cana.

Regards
 
Growing up in the Catholic church I got a different view about that but this is not the forum to discuss it so I'll just have to disagree.
 
Friends, Are there differing opinions regarding salvation (soteriology) in Christ, Mary, and the word "save"? It is clear from the Bible: There is only one Saviour: God: Father, Son, and Spirit, especially the Son, Jesus Christ. One Mediator only between God and men: the man Christ the LORD. But are there many intercessors (prayers) through the Lord God? Yes!
Although perhaps only relevant in a manner that requires much clarification, I would suggest that, to the specifically Jewish mind steeped in the Old Testament, salvation meant delivery of the nation of Israel from her oppressors and her establishment as rulers of the world (in a benign sense).

To the extent that this is true, it should inform the sense we accord to the New Testament concept of "salvation". I cannot go into detail about what I mean, so I just put this out there for your consideration.
 
Many people hold her far too high. "Flagship of all humanity"? LOL!




Mary was a normal woman and proper wife to Joseph. You relegate Joseph to some unfulfilled, sexually frustrated man. They had a normal human marital relationship and provided other children, so that Jesus knew FAMILY LIFE.

There is no need for disagreement but there is a monolithic stronghold of error in the world today claiming to be the one true church, but it isn't.
Dear Alabaster, It is part of life if we disagree. But what you claim against this belief, you claim for yourself and your own personal study of the Bible to be the one true belief, and the church is your own personal Bible study. What about public revelation? Faith revealed "unto the saints" (Jude 3), that is, publicly?
You ignore the consensus of the NT that the church is a mixture of married and unmarried persons. Don't consider only married people to be normal. Are you including St. Paul, St. John, St. Andrew, and even our Lord Jesus Christ Himself in the category of abnormal, because they were unmarried. Secondly, you slander against St. Joseph. It is totally inappropriate to suggest he would have had need of relationship in the flesh with the mother of our Lord. There is nothing in Scripture which makes it impossible that he wasn't previously married to someone before the virgin Mary, and that he was a widower. That would account for the children in controversy. The brothers and sisters of Jesus could either be cousins of Jesus, which is more likely, or possibly children of Joseph and another woman from a previous marriage of St. Joseph. It is not against God's will for some to remain single. It is not against God's will for Joseph not to have consummated his marriage to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
The idea that Mary had to be like anyone else to be "normal" is a private opinion, and not public revelation. Public revelation in the historic Church shows that that gate of Mary's womb remained shut (Ezekiel 44:1-2).
Also, everyone who reacts against this teaching repeatedly ignores the meaning of the word "until" ("to") and does not even take seriously what Rev. Gillquist says regarding the Bible's use of the term (word). You apparently read things into Fr. Gillquist's words, and do not simply accept them at face value.
I guess it is kind of normal to go and present oneself with a duck icon.
It is normal also to use smiley faces to lighten things up.
I just think this whole thing gets so serious some times, people feel like they need to lighten up.
But if we don't take each other's words seriously because of all the ducks and the smiley faces, it is small wonder. It is a temptation, smiley faces, that is hard to resist. But this is not Facebook, and there is no need to see photographs of each other, necessarily, nor need to call oneself a duck.
Take care.
In Erie PA Scott Harrington PS It is wrong to call the beliefs I have said a "monolithic stronghold of error". Those who deny historic Christianity are in error, and their opinions come from errors in reading and understanding the Scriptures in their private context. They go on their own steam, not on the steam of the Church Fathers and the public revelation of the NT in the NT Church: one, holy, catholic and apostolic. Note: some of you confuse this Orthodox belief with the "Catholic" one. No. There is some agreement between Rome and Constantinople on this matter of Mary, but Constantinople does not believe in the "immaculate conception" of Mary. That is a false teaching. Not taught by Scripture.
 
The brothers and sisters of Jesus could be cousins, eh?

Why do you reject things with the wave of the hand so summarily and yet admit that there were brothers and sisters? This is called rationalizing---all to make things fit with your particular institution's dogma.

Slander Joseph for describing him as a normal man with sexual needs and Mary as a normal woman who also has the same needs? This couple was betrothed to be married BEFORE Mary's angelic visitation. They were looking forward to their marriage and all the pleasures that they would enjoy together.

The birth of Jesus didn't negate who they were as humans, as much as crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution declared for you, hoping one day that people would never learn to read the Bible for themselves and discover their lies. Turns out even though literacy has become a common thing, people still hold to the fables. Pity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scotty~

Why this fixation you have about my avatar and my use of images? If you find them offensive, speak to moderation. Otherwise, just live with it, OK?
 
The brothers and sisters of Jesus could be cousins, eh?

Why do you reject things with the wave of the hand so summarily and yet admit that there were brothers and sisters? This is called rationalizing---all to make things fit with your particular institution's dogma.

Slander Joseph for describing him as a normal man with sexual needs and Mary as a normal woman who also has the same needs? This couple was betrothed to be married BEFORE Mary's angelic visitation. They were looking forward to their marriage and all the pleasures that they would enjoy together.

The birth of Jesus didn't negate who they were as humans, as much as crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution declared for you, hoping one day that people would never learn to read the Bible for themselves and discover their lies. Turns out even though literacy has become a common thing, people still hold to the fables. Pity.


Dear Alabaster, You slander and denigrate the teaching of the Church as that of some "crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution". Christ predicted such hate against His Church (John 15), the very Church that rejects FILIOQUE.
If you, Alabaster, say, "Who proceeds from the Father", then you agree with the very Church Christ founded. On that you would show yourself to have understood the Bible. But you act as if people who read the Bible away different from yourself are "illiterate". When you cannot answer with facts, you slander with ad hominem arguments against the historic teachings. You still have not produced one early exposition of the NT that explains how Mary and Joseph had other children, and how these children did not take care of Mary when Christ died. You still do not explain why St. John was entrusted with the care of Christ's mother, if Mary had other children with St. Joseph. Your silence is strange, since you seem to have an answer for everything I say. We are waiting, I am waiting, for your answer. Why St. John taking care of Mary, if other children of Mary existed? In Erie Scott Harrington
 
Growing up in the Catholic church I got a different view about that but this is not the forum to discuss it so I'll just have to disagree.

I hope you agree that Sister Mary What's Her Face is not the Catholic Magesterium. If you want to know what the Church actually teaches, there is a book called the "Catechism". Feel free to read the pertinent sections and see if you can find anything about "worship" or "idolizing" Mary. If you do, let me know.

What is sad is that many "former Catholics" just didn't know their faith. How could they, when they hear about 10 minutes of a sermon once a week. Can't learn much about your faith unless you take it upon yourself to do that. Being a fallen away Catholic for 20 years before coming back (by the grace of God), I know what I am talking about.

Regards
 
Dear Alabaster, You slander and denigrate the teaching of the Church as that of some "crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution". Christ predicted such hate against His Church (John 15), the very Church that rejects FILIOQUE.

The Church doesn't reject the Filioque, only a schismatic sect does.

We will continue to pray that our brothers can get past their pride and sit down and discuss the issues, rather than the incessant whining...

Regards
 
The Church doesn't reject the Filioque, only a schismatic sect does.

We will continue to pray that our brothers can get past their pride and sit down and discuss the issues, rather than the incessant whining...

Regards
Dear francisdesales, You call me one of your brothers, but then you speak out of the other side of your mouth, and complain about alleged "incessant whining". It seems to me your approach again fails by falling into ad hominem and personal attacks and calling us schismatic because we do not accept papal supremacy.
Go figure.
In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington
 
The brothers and sisters of Jesus could be cousins, eh?

Why do you reject things with the wave of the hand so summarily and yet admit that there were brothers and sisters? This is called rationalizing---all to make things fit with your particular institution's dogma.

Slander Joseph for describing him as a normal man with sexual needs and Mary as a normal woman who also has the same needs? This couple was betrothed to be married BEFORE Mary's angelic visitation. They were looking forward to their marriage and all the pleasures that they would enjoy together.

The birth of Jesus didn't negate who they were as humans, as much as crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution declared for you, hoping one day that people would never learn to read the Bible for themselves and discover their lies. Turns out even though literacy has become a common thing, people still hold to the fables. Pity.

Dear Alabaster, How about slander Joseph by considering him an "abnormal" man if he did not have fleshly relations with the Virgin Mary. Another ad hominem approach and a personal attack. Rather than consistently failing to deal with the St. John issue. If there are other children of Mary and Joseph together, why is St. John asked by Christ to take care of mother Mary, if Mary had children besides Jesus? In Erie PA Scott Harrington
 
Hi Scott,
Jesus asked John to take care of his mother because John was the youngest out of all the disciples, he was the beloved disciple, in addition to that John could go live with Jesus' mother, not only did he take care of her, but she took care of him. It was the perfect (and would we expect anything else from Jesus?) setting for them both.

Jesus had brothers and sisters, the Word tells us He did.
 
Hi Scott,
Jesus asked John to take care of his mother because John was the youngest out of all the disciples, he was the beloved disciple, in addition to that John could go live with Jesus' mother, not only did he take care of her, but she took care of him. It was the perfect (and would we expect anything else from Jesus?) setting for them both.

Jesus had brothers and sisters, the Word tells us He did.
Dear whitney, You still haven't answered the question. It is Jewish custom for the family to take care of the mother. Also, you insist on taking brothers and sisters as first family members. Not every usage of the word brother means a member of the immediate family. The OT usage can include cousins and even uncles. In Erie PA Scott Harrington
 
Dear whitney, You still haven't answered the question. It is Jewish custom for the family to take care of the mother. Also, you insist on taking brothers and sisters as first family members. Not every usage of the word brother means a member of the immediate family. The OT usage can include cousins and even uncles. In Erie PA Scott Harrington

Scott,
Does Jesus live by Jewish customs OR does He live by the Church He set up in His Name?

John was the youngest disciple, some think he was a young teen-ager, he needed someone to take care of him, and he was the beloved disciple. Mary's son was just crucified, do you think she needed perhaps a beloved disciple to be with her?

Mary was not a virgin upon her death.
 
Dear Alabaster, You slander and denigrate the teaching of the Church as that of some "crooked and weak men of some dusty old institution". Christ predicted such hate against His Church (John 15), the very Church that rejects FILIOQUE.

No, you lie. Your institution slanders the word of God.

If you, Alabaster, say, "Who proceeds from the Father", then you agree with the very Church Christ founded. On that you would show yourself to have understood the Bible. But you act as if people who read the Bible away different from yourself are "illiterate".
When the Catholic church rose up in control, they depended on the people's illiteracy, BECAUSE THEY WERE ILLITERATE!

When you cannot answer with facts, you slander with ad hominem arguments against the historic teachings. You still have not produced one early exposition of the NT that explains how Mary and Joseph had other children, and how these children did not take care of Mary when Christ died. You still do not explain why St. John was entrusted with the care of Christ's mother, if Mary had other children with St. Joseph. Your silence is strange, since you seem to have an answer for everything I say. We are waiting, I am waiting, for your answer. Why St. John taking care of Mary, if other children of Mary existed? In Erie Scott Harrington
I have already shown your the clear scripture that proves that Mary and Joseph had sexual intercourse, and the passage that shows that Jesus had siblings. Even James Himself states that he is Jesus' brother.

I am far from silent, mister.

You have been given the truth many times, yet you run right back to kneel before your institution.
 
Back
Top