cyberjosh
Member
A terrific article titled "Pagan Mythology and the Bible" was published over 10 years ago by Garry K. Brantley. It shows how finds from Ugarit & Ras Shamra have aided Biblical studies, and also some ways in which it has negatively impacted it by interpretations imposed by liberal scholars. Concerning some common themes and/or elements between pagan mythology and the Bible Brantley argues for "Similarity, Not Dependence" and states rather smartly,
[aside]
I have also bought a terrific book from him called Digging for Answers: Has Archaeology Disproved the Bible?, and you can get it on amazon used for $0.01 (!!!) up to $2.50 (if for some reason $0.01 seems suspect - but look at the seller's good ratings) at its cheepest, and I bought mine from there for $3 or $4 used I think (it had some underlined sentances - but who cares?). He talks about this issue with Ugaritic literature & the Bible in one of his chapters, as well as cases against the Documentary Hypothesis, discusses the "Historical-Critical Method", some gnitty-gritty on the actual scientific method of archaeolgical digs with facts about strata, etc., discusses evidence of the conquest of Canaan and its conflicting theories, and also as well has a very good introduction as to how Biblical Archaeology has changed and grown with different "schools" of thinking starting with the great W. F. Albright up to modern day. He also carefully delineates the difference between the evidence & the "schools of thought" for interpreting that evidence. Most importantly it's not boring or mundane and is highly readable and compact (170 pages) and I gurantee you wont get bored with it. One Amazon reviewer's review-title says it all: "Exceptional in readability and approach...". It is very engaging.
For $0.01 you should have no excuse not to buy that book! (You do have to pay shipping of course though ) It has invaluable apologetics information about archaeology that is presented in a rather unique, fair, and inteligent format. And for the skeptics he is also bound to satisfy them to a degree as well because of his very reasonable and balanced approach, although he does err on the side of the Bible (but for good reasons which he presents and explains at length in the book). He also has terrific source citing so that you have lots of supplemental material to reference (similar to the amount of sources used for that article above - roughly - for each chapter in the book). In short: I recommend it.
[/aside]
But perhaps we can discuss some of these issues and delve into ANE texts and the semitic cultural context in which the Bible was written.
[continued below to keeps posts to a reasonable size...]
[W]e should expect some similarity of language and literary style between extra-biblical and biblical texts due to common cultural milieu (see Redford, 1987, 13[3]:27). In fact, if biblical language and style were entirely unlike the literature of its secular contemporaries, the Bible’s authenticity would be suspect.
[aside]
I have also bought a terrific book from him called Digging for Answers: Has Archaeology Disproved the Bible?, and you can get it on amazon used for $0.01 (!!!) up to $2.50 (if for some reason $0.01 seems suspect - but look at the seller's good ratings) at its cheepest, and I bought mine from there for $3 or $4 used I think (it had some underlined sentances - but who cares?). He talks about this issue with Ugaritic literature & the Bible in one of his chapters, as well as cases against the Documentary Hypothesis, discusses the "Historical-Critical Method", some gnitty-gritty on the actual scientific method of archaeolgical digs with facts about strata, etc., discusses evidence of the conquest of Canaan and its conflicting theories, and also as well has a very good introduction as to how Biblical Archaeology has changed and grown with different "schools" of thinking starting with the great W. F. Albright up to modern day. He also carefully delineates the difference between the evidence & the "schools of thought" for interpreting that evidence. Most importantly it's not boring or mundane and is highly readable and compact (170 pages) and I gurantee you wont get bored with it. One Amazon reviewer's review-title says it all: "Exceptional in readability and approach...". It is very engaging.
For $0.01 you should have no excuse not to buy that book! (You do have to pay shipping of course though ) It has invaluable apologetics information about archaeology that is presented in a rather unique, fair, and inteligent format. And for the skeptics he is also bound to satisfy them to a degree as well because of his very reasonable and balanced approach, although he does err on the side of the Bible (but for good reasons which he presents and explains at length in the book). He also has terrific source citing so that you have lots of supplemental material to reference (similar to the amount of sources used for that article above - roughly - for each chapter in the book). In short: I recommend it.
[/aside]
But perhaps we can discuss some of these issues and delve into ANE texts and the semitic cultural context in which the Bible was written.
[continued below to keeps posts to a reasonable size...]