Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Predestination and Free Will

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$905.00
Goal
$1,038.00

Judy

Member
lesson2ss4.png


At the time of the American Revolution, almost every Christian denomination in America affirmed the Reformed doctrine of predestination. Christians believed that God alone was to be credited with their salvationâ€â€even their cooperation with God’s grace was brought about by God’s grace. God had chosen some for eternal life and not others, and only God knew his reasons for the selection. Baptists, Anglicans, Congregationalists, Dutch Reformed, and (of course) Presbyteriansâ€â€all stood solidly upon this biblical teaching. One thing, however, was sureâ€â€God didn’t choose us because he knew we would believe. Rather, we believed because God chose us. God was God, and all the glory would go to him.

After two centuries of immersion in American culture, however, American Christianity has entered the new millennium in a state of crisis. Few Americans today believe in predestination. They may say they do, but they then define predestination as based upon God’s foresight of our faith. In the end, the reason I’m saved was because of my free will, not God’s sovereign choice. I guess the reason I believed when my neighbor didn’t is because I was just better than my neighbor. I was good enough to believe by my own free will. I thank you, Father, that I had the good sense to cooperate with you....

I’ll say this right at the outset. Free-will Christianity is a bastardization of biblical Christianity. It is inconsistent Christianity. Perhaps “heresy†is even a fair term for it. All this “free will†thinking is just another form of legalism, making salvation depend upon us rather than upon Jehovah. Don’t get me wrongâ€â€many who buy this thinking are genuine, sincere believers and will be with the Lord forever. After all, a major point in this class will be that God’s grace is more powerful than our blindness. But there has been a lack of biblical teaching here for decades. The result of this dearth has been an even bigger problem, a problem so terrifying as to threaten the very vitality of the American church. We have lost sight of God’s greatness. How rare today is a sermon on God’s majesty, his sovereign power, his wrath, his judgment, his overpowering rule over history, his supremacy, his fierceness, his eternal predestination. If we’re really, really honest with ourselves, Do we truly know God anymore? We have tamed God. Castrated him, perhaps. As one theologian laments... our thoughts of God have become far too human.

This should come as no surprise in America. For two centuries, the church has existed in an American culture whose highest values are personal liberty and individual rights. It would be quite natural for Christians here to filter the Bible through such a lens. The kingdom of God has to be all about me. It has to be relevant to my life, right? And if I am saved, it has to be because of my decisions, right? My will has to be free, right? God would be unfair to have it any other way. God has to be an equal opportunity Savior. Isn’t God a democracy? Didn’t Jesus preach about the Republic of God? All this is to suggest that American churches don’t teach predestination because they are more American than they are Christian. We have come to think that our God is small. Now it’s time for a new Reformation in the churches, a Reformation in which we honor God as God, not just as mascot. We need a Reformation in which God is glorified as God, and not just as someone who “fills our needs.†Enough about our needs! It’s far past time we let God be God. I know of no “need†more pressing than this.

Still, even with all this misunderstanding about predestination, nearly every major Christian denomination in history has felt compelled to have some doctrine of predestination. Our generation is not the first to have to work through this biblical issue. About the year 400, Augustine and Pelagius fought over this doctrineâ€â€and Pelagius was condemned as a heretic for his doctrine of free will. Then at the Council of Orange in 529 AD, the Christians united to reject free will in favor of God’s sovereign grace. And again in 855, the Council of Valence affirmed a double predestination. During the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century, Martin Luther called the doctrine of predestination the cor ecclesia, the heart of the Church. Luther wrote more about predestination than did John Calvin, even though the term “Calvinism†was unfortunately applied to the doctrine. If one looks at the greatest theologians in the 2,000 years of Christian historyâ€â€Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, Edwardsâ€â€although these men disagree on other issues and are by no means infallible, all of them agree on this question of predestination.

“We confess a predestination of the elect to life, and a predestination of the wicked to death; that, in the election of those who are saved, the mercy of God precedes anything we do, and in the condemnation of those who will perish, evil merit precedes the righteous judgment of God.â€Â

â€â€Council of Valence, 855

“Predestination to Life is the everlasting Purpose of God, whereby (before the foundations of the world were laid) He hath decreed by His counsel secret to us, to deliver from curse and damnation those whom He hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation, as vessels made to honor.â€Â

â€â€Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England, 1563


St. Augustine (543-430)

“From all eternity God decreed all that should happen in time, and this He did freely and unalterably, consulting only His own wise and holy will.... The angels and men who are the subjects of God's predestination are clearly and irreversibly designated, and their number is unalterably fixed.â€Â

â€â€The Baptist Confession of 1689

The term predestination itself is clear enough: the eternal destinies of men and women were determined beforehand (pre) by God. Before the creation, God chose who would go to heaven and who would go to hell. Christians believe in predestination for one simple reason. The Bible teaches it. No other reason will suffice. In Ephesians 1:5-6, for example, Scripture tells us when this choice took placeâ€â€before creation, in eternity. And the Bible tells us what this predestination is untoâ€â€adoption through Jesus, to be holy and blameless before God. And it tells us here why God chose usâ€â€so that his glory could be praised.

lesson6bz2.jpg


Three views on Predestination
The real question in not whether or not Christians should believe in predestinationâ€â€the Bible clearly teaches predestination. The real question is this: whom did God predestine to eternal life, and (even more importantly) why did God choose those He predestined?

1. The optimistic view: God has predestined everybody to eternal life. Satan has predestined everybody to eternal death. God is for you, the Devil is against youâ€â€you have to cast the tie-breaker. The problem with this view is that it has absolutely nothing to do with the Bible's view of predestination. The Bible clearly states that not everyone is predestined, but only those who will eventually believe and enjoy eternal life. Christians are frequently called the elect, as opposed to the non-elect, and are said to be the chosen ones (see Rom 8:33; 11:7; 1 Cor 1:27-29; Col 3:12; 2 Tim 2:10; Tit 1:1; 1 Pe 2:8-9)â€â€God has not chosen everyone. God has chosen some for eternal life and rejected others. But on what basis has God chosen some?

2. The Arminian view: God has predestined some to eternal life because He saw in advance that such persons would cooperate with the Holy Spirit and believe by their own free will. God gives everyone an equal amount of grace, and those willing to take it are saved. God chose us because we were going to choose Him.

3. The Reformed (Calvinist) view: God predestined some to eternal life, not because He saw that they would have believed on their own (They wouldn’t have!), but because of His own good pleasure. God chose us despite our rejection of Him, not because we would be cooperative. God chose to change our hearts, and he has done so and will continue to do so until all of his elect are gathered.

Calvinists and Arminians agree that only some are elect, and that those who are elect will come to faith and believe until the end (if, in fact, they are elect). And everyone agrees that those who turn from sin to follow Christ are saved. The question is this: On what basis did God predestine them? Did God predestine some because He knew they would believe of their own free will, or did He predestine without regard to human choices? Was God's choice based on our choice, or is our choice itself as a result of God's choice?

The Five Points of Calvinism
In 1610, a group of the followers of James Arminius, a Dutch professor, presented a list of five grievances to the Dutch Parliament. Imbued with the humanism then arising within Europe, these “Arminians†were not pleased with the direction the Protestant Reformation had takenâ€â€objecting particularly to the doctrine of predestination as the Reformers (Luther, Calvin) had taught it. After eight years of biblical study and reflection, however, the Reformation churches meeting at Dort rejected the five Arminian objections as unbiblical. Their response followed the five Arminian objections, and has been passed down to us as the “Five Points†of Calvinism, known for its acronym, TULIP:

Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible grace, and the Perseverance of the saints. There are better titles for each of these doctrinesâ€â€and this class will not deal with the extent of the atonement (that will have to be dealt with later). The two theological systems may be compared as follows:

lesson7kf5.png


The name “Five Point of Calvinism†is a little misleading, of course. Calvinist churches teach more than five pointsâ€â€the vision is to teach the whole counsel of God! These particular five points were simply the five under fire in the seventeenth century. One might suggest that these are five of the hundred or so points of biblical Christianity. Yet the one great point behind all five points is the supreme point that salvation is of the Lord, from beginning to end. God is God, and he does as he pleases. And if h has chosen to give us salvation, we’re going to make sure that we give all the glory for it to him, not to ourselves. Predestination is not just a Presbyterian thing. As the nineteenth century English Baptist preacher C.H. Spurgeon exclaimed, “I love to preach the strong old doctrines nicknamed Calvinism, but which are surely and verily the revealed truth of God as it is in Christ Jesus.â€Â


lesson12kk9.png
 
lesson10ro0.png


A few years ago, a Christian company in Florida began marketing “Jesus the Doll,†a doll the makers claim will “help children discover Jesus.†For $29.95, the doll promises to “provide solace for the elderly and the infirm, for those in recovery programs, and those in emotional duress.†The real Lord is just too ethereal. “It’s hard to hug air,†the company notes. They planned to follow this doll with the release of “God the Doll,†a two-foot rag-doll with white hair and a long beard, completely machine washable, of course. Is this the God in whom we trust?

I fear that many or even most American Christians have forgotten the sovereign power of God. Our God is abounding in love and mercy, but not in hugs. He is too big to hug. And those who have seen himâ€â€men like Isaiah in Isaiah 6â€â€wanted to run from God rather than to hug him. In terror they cry, “Woe is me, I am ruined!†Even the sinless angels who minister before God’s throne dare not look God in the face, but cover their eyes and feet and cry out, “Holy, Holy, Holy!†Our God is a consuming fire, not a rag-doll. And God is sovereignâ€â€he is in control.

God has ordained everything in History

The third chapter of the Westminster Confession of Faith opens with these words: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass†(adding the qualification that God is not the author of sin and that people aren’t puppets). This statement was taken straight from Paul’s statement in Ephesians 1:11:

“In him we were predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will.â€Â

DEFINE: 1) plan 2) everything 3) purpose 4) will


God as architect, 13th century

As R.C. Sproul points out, were there one maverick molecule out there somewhere apart from the plan of God, we would have no reason to hope in God. That one maverick molecule could be the one detail that defeats God’s eternal purpose. “For lack of the nail, the shoe was lost. For lack of the shoe, the horse was lost. For lack of the horse, the rider was lost. For lack of the rider, the battle was lost. For lack of the battle, the war was lost.â€Â

God is all-powerful, and all of history is merely the outworking of his eternal plan. God not merely created the world, but his eternal power sustains it and continues its existence by the sheer exertion of his willâ€â€were God to blink, all would come to an end. God is the First Cause that lies behind all secondary causes. Out of all the billions of ways that God could have planned history, this is the plan God chose. God’s invisible hand is secretly at work controlling all things.

God controls the entire universe: Ps 103:19; Rom 8:28; Eph 1:11
God controls all of nature: Ps 135:6-7; Mt 5:45; 6:25-30
God controls angels & Satan: Ps 103:20-21; Job 1:12
God controls nations: Ps 47:7-9; Dan 2:20-21; 4:34-35
God controls human beings: 1 Sam 2:6-7; Gal 1:15-16
God controls animals: Ps 104:21-30; 1 Ki 17:4-6
God controls "accidents": Pr 16:33; Jon 1:7; Mt 10:29
God controls free acts of men: Ex 3:21; 12:25-36; Ez 7:27
God controls sinful acts of men and Satan: Acts 2:23; 4:27-28;
2 Sam 24:1; 1 Chr 21:1; Gen 45:5; 50:20
Concurrence
A key biblical principle that helps illuminate God’s sovereignty is called concurrence. People have plans, which may be good or may be evil, and people are responsible for the plans they make. God also has a plan, a plan which overrules all other plans. God’s eternal purpose and humanity’s purposes concurâ€â€they take place at the same time. As J.I. Packer explains, “God’s control is absolute in the sense that men do only that which He has ordained that they should do; yet they are truly free agents in the sense that their decisions are their own, and they are morally responsible for them.†While our motives may be impure, even our attempts to thwart God’s eternal plan in fact only serve to further it. We see this principle of concurrence active in several biblical passages.

In Acts 2:23 and 4:27-28, God plans the murder of Jesus, the worst sin in history. God tells us that Christ’s murderers were working out his eternal plan, then goes on to say that they will be judged for their actions.

In Genesis 45:5 and 50:20, God plans the attempted murder and enslavement of Joseph so that God could eventually rescue millions of people from famine. Joseph tells his brothers that their plan was wickedâ€â€Ã¢â‚¬Å“You intended to harm me.†But God’s plan trumped their plan, Joseph explains, “But God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.â€Â

In Job 1, we see the Sabeans and Chaldeansâ€â€spurred on by Satanâ€â€killing Job’s cattle and livestock, even though we know what Job could only perceive by faithâ€â€that their actions were in fact a part of God’s plan, who had chosen to allow Satan to inspire these actions.
In light of the biblical principle of concurrence, we understand how God even ordains evil and the suffering that follows from living in a sin-sickened world. This may seem ironic, since God hates sin and forbids people from sinning. God hates death tooâ€â€Jesus even wept at the sight of death. But God also ordains deathâ€â€it’s his curse on all of us for the sins of our first parents (Genesis 3). God ordains sin and suffering, even though he despises them. That’s the mystery of concurrence. This does not make human beings simply “puppetsâ€Ââ€â€puppets do not have desires or wills; puppets do not make choices. People doâ€â€but God is the invisible hand at work in, behind and through the plans of mice and men, always accomplishing his eternal and unchanging purpose.

This has practical implications. Don’t tell someone who is suffering that God had nothing to do with his or her suffering. The last thing I want to be told when I’m suffering is that my pain has no significance! God ordains every disappointment, loss and sorrow just as surely as he ordains every joy. This was Job’s faith: “The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away. May the name of the LORD be praised.†God has a purposeâ€â€even when we can’t always understand it. Our sufferings and even our sin have significance greater than themselves. They are the black stitches that God includes in the beautiful tapestry of his plan.

The greatest idol in American culture today is the idol of personal self-determination. Personal choice is cherished above God. Perhaps the reason it is so hard to teach the doctrine of predestination is because to preach this doctrine is to pierce the very heart of man's rebellion. "In Him we were chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of Him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of His will" (Ephesians 1:11). Who decides? God does, and He doesn't care how you feel about it. God is holy. God is sovereign. God is God. Bow the knee and fear the Lord. Fall before him and worship.
 
lesson15ax5.png


THE TRIAL
DEFENDANT: God

OCCUPATION: Maker, ruler, judge of heavens and earth

ADDRESS: Everywhere, particularly “the heavensâ€Â

CHARGE: Being selfish

THE EVIDENCE:

1. Hell, Fires of. Billions will suffer there, and the Defendant says he will do it to “display his wrath.â€Â

2. Intolerance of non-Christian religions. He calls them idolatry and says he will punish them.

3. Intolerance of numerous behaviors that people enjoy.

4. Insistence that people focus all attention on Defendant all the time. Intolerant of those who do otherwise.

5. Multiple unexpected outbursts of anger.

a. Nadab & Abihu, whom Defendant burned with fire while they offered sacrifices in Defendant’s temple.
b. Uzzah, whom Defendant struck dead while trying to keep Defendant's ark from falling to the ground.
c. Ananias and Sapphira, whom Defendant killed while they were donating money to Defendant's church.
d. Christians in Corinth whom Defendant killed because they ate their communion bread too quickly.
6. Repeated remarks that everything must happen for Defendants own glory. Refusal to share glory with others.

DEFENDANTS PLEA: Guilty as charged.

lesson16st7.jpg

Jonathan Edwards (1707-58)

There are lots of passages in the Bible that honestly trouble a lot of Christiansâ€â€passages where God kills people, punishes people, says things that seem intolerant, offensive, even selfish. Whenever a passage in the Bible rubs us the wrong way, it should give us pause, because the problem is not with the Bible, but with us. What is it we don’t understand about God’s character that makes some of God’s actions seem so unfair? There is one simple truth thatâ€â€once graspedâ€â€makes us see things as God sees them and unlocks a renewed understanding of God and God’s ways. One single passion drives God’s heart. That passion, as teachers like Augustine and Jonathan Edwards have helped us to see, is this: God’s primary concern in everything he does is to bring glory to himself.

God is chiefly concerned with his own fame. God is self-centered. Selfish, one might even say. If there's one thing we know from the Bible, it's that God is chiefly concerned with the honor of his nameâ€â€just look at the prayer Jesus taught us to pray. Before ever getting to ourselves and our needs, we pray for God’s name to be honored, for God’s rule (kingdom) to be furthered and for God’s will to be done. Even when God saves sinners from their sinsâ€â€a supreme act of generosityâ€â€God insists that he's doing it for his own benefit more than for theirs. Observe how God speaks of salvation in Isaiah 48:11:

"For my own sake, for my own sake, I do this. How can I let myself be defamed? I will not yield my glory to another."
Think about it. If it is man's highest purpose that he glorify God, how can we expect God to have a lesser purpose? Jesus said the greatest commandment is to love God with all of our heart, mind, soul and strength. God has not disobeyed this commandment. The first commandment was to have no other gods before the LORD. God is not an idolater. The most passionate heart for God in all the universe is God's heart. God's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy himself forever. God is not an instrument, but the end for which we exist. This is why the English revivalist George Whitefield cried, “Let the name of Whitefield perish, so long as God is glorified!â€Â


George Whitefield (1713-70)

God is ultimate, not us. And true religion ultimately exists not for humanity, but for God. This is only reasonable. It is wrong for a man to be self-centered because man is not actually the center of the universe. God is, has always been, and always shall be the center of the universe. Were God to act as if another were central to the universe, that "other" would be God. It is wrong for man to judge, as if he were God, because he isn't God. But God is God, and it is right for him to perform the functions that are only worthy of God. Besides, God is God, and his perfect character is the very standard of good and evil. Whatever God desires is good. And God chiefly desires himself. The biblical doctrine of predestination will make no sense until we grasp this central aspect of God’s heart.

The ultimate answer to every question is “to glorify of Godâ€Â:

Why did God create us? Isaiah 43:6-7

Why did God rescue the Israelites from Egypt? Psalm 106:7-8

Why did God raise up Pharaoh? Romans 9:17

Why did God defeat Pharaoh? Exodus 14:4

Why did God spare Israel in the wilderness? Ezekiel 20:14

Why will God not reject believers? 1 Samuel 12:20-22

Why did God restore Israel after the exile? Ezekiel 36:22-23, 32

Why does God answer our prayers? John 14:13

Why does God forgive sins? Isaiah 43:25

How could David ask God for forgiveness? Psalm 25:11

What is the Holy Spirit's ministry? John 16:14

What should motivate everything we do? 1 Corinthians 10:31

Why did God strike Herod dead? Acts 12:23

Why is Jesus coming back? 2 Thessalonians 1:9-10

What is God's plan for the earth? Habakkuk 2:14

God even ordains evil for the greater good of the display of God's character. Look at Romans 9:19-24. God ordains human sin so he can make his wrath known. This display would be impossible without evil. God also allows our evil choices so he can make his mercy known. This too would be impossible without evil. A world with evil is thus eternally significant in a way that a world without evil would not be. It can bring a greater display of God’s character. Again, in all he does, God’s chief concern is to bring honor to himself.

lesson18vr5.png


This teaching tends to hit people like a ton of bricks. Why? Is this a terrible notion? Not at allâ€â€this is it a cause for joy! Granted, if we’re living for ourselves, then we should be depressed. But if what we really want is for our Father to be honored, then no teaching should thrill us more! God’s self-centered majesty is what I find most beautiful about Godâ€â€that God is God and there is no other! Jonathan Edwards suggested that until God's selfishness is precisely what attracts us to God, we may not yet have begun to love God at all, but only ourselves. The heart of true worship is in line with God’s heart, and wants nothing more than for the King to be magnified. Let us remember Henry Blamires’ warning:

“If we try to change the face of eternal God, we indulge in the supreme idolatry, beside whch perhaps, in the scale of sin, adultery weighs like a feather and murder like a farthing. Yet the sin is committed among us, within Christendom, within the Church-- maybe within ourselves; for are we sure, after all, that we prayed to the true God this morning?â€Â
 
lesson21yb5.png


A “Free†Will in Bondage to Sin
We all realize that human beings have willsâ€â€we have the capacity to make decisions. The glitch is this: Human beings can choose to do whatever they desire. Yet our desires are rarely under our control! If this is what is meant by free will, then the Bible assumes that we have it. God commands us to be perfect, and we have wills and therefore may choose either to obey or to disobey. But given the choice, does the fallen, sinful human have the moral and spiritual ability to incline his heart toward God?

Biblically, the only possible answer is No. As Augustine pointed out, unbelievers are not even able to cooperate with God's graceâ€â€sinful man is not just mistaken; sinful man is hostile toward God (See chart). If humanity had the opportunity to kill God, it would do so (as it did 2,000 years ago). Human depravity runs far deeper than we realize. Saving faith can only flow from a heart that loves God as He actually isâ€â€good fruit cannot come from a bad tree. Yet Scripture teaches that man in his natural, fallen condition does not and cannot love God. “There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God†(Romans 3:10-11). As Luther argued in his 1524 Bondage of the Will, sinful man is incapable of seeking God, for man's free will is in bondage to sin. What do the following passages teach about human inability?

Psalm 58:3
Genesis 6:5
John 6:44
1 Corinthians 2:14
2 Corinthians 4:4
Luke 16:19-31

lesson23dk7.png


Michael Horton puts like this, “We cannot find God for the same reason that a thief can't find a police officer.†Sinful man cannot find God because he doesn't want God. R.C. Sproul explains, “Fallen man has the natural ability to make choices but lacks the moral ability to make godly choices.†From conception onward, humanity is spiritually dead, hostile to God, and unable to incline its heart toward God. Free will profits man nothing, for the will is in bondage to sin, leaving human beings helpless.


“As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our sinful nature and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath. But because of His great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ when we were dead in transgressions-- it is by grace you have been savedâ€Â

â€â€Ephesians 2:1-5.

The New Birth: Spiritual Resurrection
When we were dead in sins, when we unknowingly followed Satan, when we were enslaved to our sinful desires, when we were by our very natures objects of wrath, God did something. We were unable to do anything. We were unable to believe. We were unable to incline our hearts toward God. We didn’t want to! But when we could do nothing, God alone took action. We were dead. (We were not terminally ill; nor were we were going down for the countâ€â€we were stone cold spiritual corpses.) Yet God made us alive. God gave us new birth (regeneration). We were born again. Before we could even believe, God gave us new birth. On a technical level, we were not born again because we believed. We were born again and believe as a result. When Nicodemus couldn't understand who Jesus was, Jesus taught him that man could not even see the kingdom of heaven, let alone enter it, until he was first born again (John 3:3). Even faith itself is a gift given by God to those who otherwise wouldn't want it. The new birth came first. The new birth caused the faith to be present. Regeneration precedes faith.

Is Faith a Gift of God?

Matthew 11:27
Luke 8:10
Luke 10:21-22
John 6:35-39, 44
John 10.24-29
John 15:16
Acts 16:14
Acts 13:48
Acts 18:27
Ephesians 2:8-9
Philippians 1:29

lesson24fg5.png


Is Repentance a Gift of God?

Acts 11:18
Romans 9:15-16
2 Timothy 2:25
justice, mercy and injustice

Our conversion to Christ was not a joint venture between us and God, but a unilateral move on God’s part to raise us from spiritual death to spiritual life, changing our hearts so that we believed and repented. Salvation is by grace aloneâ€â€sola gratia, to use the Reformation slogan. Even our willingness to cooperate with the Holy Spirit was given to us by God. Yet this brings us to a sober realizationâ€â€God does not give this kind of grace to everyone. Not everyone is given faith. Is this unfair?

No. Unequal, yesâ€â€but not unfair. We are sinners and all of us deserve God’s justiceâ€â€punishment for our sins. No one deserves mercy. If mercy were deserved, it would not be mercyâ€â€it would be justice! God is not unjust to anyoneâ€â€no one gets less than he deserves. Some of us have received mercy; others will receive justice. God is not an equal opportunity Savior. Indeed, from Abraham on, God has always shown more mercy to one people than to another. God chose Abraham in a way he did not choose Abraham’s next-door neighbor. God revealed himself to Paul in a way he didn’t show himself to Nicodemus. God is sovereign in his exercise of mercy.

lesson25ib2.jpg
 
lesson28kz2.png


Foreknowledge
Some object to the concept of predestination by arguing that God predestines the elect because he knows in advance that they will come to Christ by their own free will. As seen in the previous lesson, however, that notion is blatantly unbiblical. No one has the ability to even cooperate with God’s grace. Several biblical passages, however, do speak of God’s “foreknowledge.†While God certainly knows the future (he determines it!), the biblical concept of foreknowledge is something different. The term (proorizw) is used, not of knowing events, but of knowing people. God tells us that he knew us before we knew him. As God told Jeremiah, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I set you apart†(Jer. 1:5). Indeed, the major Greek lexicon (BAG) states that “foresight†or “prescience†is not even a possible meaning for “foreknowledge†in passages such as Romans 8:29-30. And in the Great Chain of Salvation in this passage, it should be noted that only those who were foreknown are called by the Holy Spiritâ€â€not everyone. Rather, foreordination (choosing) is always meant in the Greek when this term is used of a man with God as subject, as in 1 Peter 1:20, where God “foreknew†Jesus as savior before creationâ€â€God appointed Jesus as savior, that is. The “foreknowledge†view of predestination is not an explanation of the biblical teaching, but rather a denial of it.

Is Predestination Double?
Up to this point, we have already seen that predestination cannot have been conditioned by faith, as man would never have faith on his own. It is God who gives faith. Our predestination was not on the basis of anything good or cooperative in us-- it was simply for God's good pleasure. God controls who does and does not believe. Those whom God has predestined to eternal life believe; the rest do not. But what of those who do not? Has God chosen that they not believe?

1. The Bible teaches that God has chosen or predestined some sinnersâ€â€his electâ€â€to inherit eternal life.

Romans 8:29, 33
1 Corinthians 1:27-29
Colossians 3:12
2 Timothy 2:10
Titus 1:1
2. The Bible also teaches that God has predestined other sinnersâ€â€some call them the reprobateâ€â€to condemnation.



Romans 9:1-24
Romans 11:4-10
1 Peter 2:8-9

lesson29ae0.jpg

John Calvin (1509-64)

This predestination to judgment is not one in which God actively works sin into the hearts of the reprobate. As Luther argued, God does not have to place “fresh evil†(Luther’s term) into anyone’s heartâ€â€there’s enough there already! God works actively to save his elect, changing their hearts to make them love him. But he does not work actively to turn the reprobate against himâ€â€they do that on their own. God does harden hearts, but in the sense of handing them over to their own sinful desiresâ€â€as Paul discusses in Romans 1. God need do nothingâ€â€they already have enough rope to hang themselves. As the Bible tells us that God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so too it mentions that Pharaoh hardened his own heart. Both are trueâ€â€God gave Pharaoh what he wantedâ€â€freedomâ€â€and Pharaoh used it to destroy himself.
ROMANS 9
Paul discusses this question in Romans 9. In Romans 9-11, Paul is answering an objection raised against the gospel. Paul said in Romans 8:39 that God promises that nothing can separate the elect from God's love. But, the objection comes, “What about God's promises to Israel?†Most Jews do not believe, yet they were the chosen people of God! “It is not as though God's word had failed,†Paul writes, “for not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.†Here Paul begins his first explanation of why some Jews believe Christ and others do not. In chapter 10, Paul will explain that the gospel was offered to the Jews, but that they had rejected it. In chapter 11, Paul will discuss God's future plans for Israelâ€â€that God will work among the Jewish people in the future. Thus, Paul answers the problem in three ways: human responsibility (ch.10), God's future grace (ch.11), and in chapter 9, God's sovereign predestination.

9:6-9 In the past, God has chosen some and rejected others. God did this with the children of Abraham. Abraham had two sonsâ€â€Ishmael and Isaac. Yet God rejected Ishmael; it was Isaac who was chosen by God. God's promise has not failed, but it did not apply to all descendants of Abrahamâ€â€only to the line of Isaac.

9:10-13 God worked this way with Isaac's twin sons, as well. Even though Esau was born first, Esau was rejected. Paul stresses that God chose the younger (Jacob) before either twin was born or had done anything good or badâ€â€God's choice was not based on anything good in Jacob. God loved Jacob. God hated Esau.

9:14-18 In Moses' day, God chose some for mercy and hardened others, too. God hardened Pharaoh to display His power before the earth. God owes compassion to no one. He owes no one mercy. Sinners deserve justice, that is, punishment. The fact that God shows mercy to one and not to another is not unfair, because neither one deserves mercy. Ultimately, salvation does not depend on man's desire or decision, but on God's choosing to show mercy.

9:19-21 Paul deals with an objection that is never raised against Arminians, but which was raised against Paul: How can God blame people for not believing if He controls who does or does not believe? Paul doesn't answerâ€â€he rebukes the question as being impenitent. God is God. God created people, and He can do whatever He wants with them. It is the Potter's prerogative to do what He wants with the clay.

9:22-24 Up until this time, Paul has been speaking about God's choosing and rejecting in the past, but now he applies it to the present. Today, God has called some Jews and Gentiles (some of each) to become vessels displaying God's glory. God has also prepared other Jews and Gentiles for destruction in order to demonstrate before the world God's wrath and power. Here is a double predestination: God, without regard to human desire or effort, has chosen some for glory (election) and others for wrath (reprobation).


The Grand Demonstration
In the end, what makes the difference between one sinner believing & his next-door neighbor not believing? After all else is said & done, the difference lies in God, not in man (See Rom 11:4-10; 1 Pe 2:8-9). God saw two men in rebellion committing spiritual suicide, and chose to rescue only one. The fact must stand: God is not an equal opportunity Savior. God shows some a degree of undeserved grace that He does not show to others. But the majesty of grac is that God has shown grace to anyone! All of history is the process of God's preparing two peoples to display His characterâ€â€one to display God’s mercy, the other to display God’s justice. At the end of history will come the Grand Demonstration of the good and perfect, merciful and just character of Almighty God.
 
Judy,
Whoa!! Thats enough to get all the so called Calvinists doing back flips on this BB. That was a very good analysis of the history of the discussion on "free will." It was also a good statement of Calvinist theology.
 
mondar said:
Judy,
Whoa!! Thats enough to get all the so called Calvinists doing back flips on this BB. That was a very good analysis of the history of the discussion on "free will." It was also a good statement of Calvinist theology.

Yes it was. She did her homework. I also agree with her that the belief in "free will" is heretical. But I still think we ought to stick to the bible instead of following theologians. I kow that we use the term "Calvinisim" to describe an interpretation of the bible. But if we jsut stick to the bible, Calvin's beliefs are all right there. So in the end, we are only following Christ. :)
 
lesson3tp4.png


One major debate within Christian circles is the question of whether or not a Christian can lose his or her salvation. Arminians argue that true believers can sin so much that they lose their faith and perish. Some Christians respond by arguing that once a person professes faith in Jesus, he is eternally secure in his salvation andâ€â€even if he commits complete apostasy (“falls awayâ€Â) and vocally rejects Jesus Christâ€â€will still go to heaven, for “once saved, always saved.†In light of the biblical doctrine of predestination, how should we understand the security we have under God’s care? There have been three main approaches to the question:

1. Classic Arminianism

One must persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers can lose their faith.
Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.
2. Antinomianism

One need not persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers can lose their faith.
Those who lose their faith are saved, since they once believed.
3. Classic Calvinism

One must persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers cannot lose their faith, since it’s God’s gift.
Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.
Those who “lose†their faith never had it to begin with.
God will preserve true believers and they will be saved.
Proponents of the first two approaches quote biblical references, but each must strain to explain away the other group's biblical data. How can an Arminian read Romans 8, then tell true believers that they may screw up and go to hell??? Then again, how can Charles Stanley read Hebrews 6 and 10 and tell unbelievers who once professed faith not to worry, that they will be saved??? Any true biblical teaching must “fit†with ALL the biblical data, without pitting one text against another and without having to explain away a single “jot or tittle†of God's inerrant Word. I believe that only the classical Calvinist model takes into account all of the biblical data.

lesson4im2.jpg

Duccio, Temptation of Christ, 1311

Arminians are right when they say the Bible teaches that only those who persevere will be saved, and they’re right in accusing Antinomians of easy-believism and cheap grace. Antinomians (they wouldn’t use the term) are right in telling committed believers that they are secure in Christ and “once saved, always saved.†But both of these views are wrong in assuming that a true believer can lose his faith and fall away from Christ. Faith is “a gift of Godâ€â€not by works, lest any man boast.†Paul was confident that, since Christ had begun a good work in believers, He would continue that work until completion (Phil. 1). John said that those who fell away were never really true Christians, since true believers don't leave the faith (1 John 2:19).

Scripture teaches that believers must persevere until the end, but also that believers will persevere until the end by God's grace. As the Westminster Assembly concluded, Christians might temporarily yield to Satan's temptations, even to excess, but like Peter when he denied Christ three times, God will still restore and preserve the faith of the Christian, a faith which God gave in the first place! Peter went on to be chief among the apostles!

lesson5ra7.jpg

The Westminster Assembly, Convened by Parliament 1643-47

1. You Must Persevere until the End: God's Requirement of His People

God does not merely command us to begin to believe for a time, and then fall away. He requires us to continue to believe until the end, living lives of repentance and covenant faithfulness. Granted, He does not ask for a perfect faith, but He does ask for a real faith, one that produces real, lasting change.

Colossians 1:21-23
Hebrews 10:26-31
1 John 1:5-10; 3:3-6
Hebrews 12:1
2. You Will Persevere Until the End: God's Preservation of His People

We will persevere because God preserves us. God will keep us from fallingâ€â€not one will be lost of all those who belong to the Son. True believers are not able to leave Christ, for Christ is at work within them.

John 6:38-40
John 10:28-29
Romans 8:28-39
Philippians 1:4-6
Philippians 2:12-13
1 John 2:19
This first set of texts cannot be used to refute the second (Arminianism); nor can the second set of texts be used to refute the first (cheap grace). The point that makes the two compatible is the biblical teaching that faith (while commanded of everyone) is a gift from God to His elect. If faith is simply a human action of a free will, then it can be lost. But if saving faith is God's gift, then it cannot be lost. Can professing Christians fall away? Yes, and they will perish. Can true Christians fall away? No, for they are kept by the invincible power of God in Christ. The Bible teaches us that professing Christians who leave the faith were never truly believers (1 John 2:19; and notice the qualification even in Hebrews 10:39).
lesson6bp2.png
 
Judy said:
lesson3tp4.png


One major debate within Christian circles is the question of whether or not a Christian can lose his or her salvation. Arminians argue that true believers can sin so much that they lose their faith and perish. Some Christians respond by arguing that once a person professes faith in Jesus, he is eternally secure in his salvation andâ€â€even if he commits complete apostasy (“falls awayâ€Â) and vocally rejects Jesus Christâ€â€will still go to heaven, for “once saved, always saved.†In light of the biblical doctrine of predestination, how should we understand the security we have under God’s care? There have been three main approaches to the question:

1. Classic Arminianism

One must persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers can lose their faith.
Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.
2. Antinomianism

One need not persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers can lose their faith.
Those who lose their faith are saved, since they once believed.
3. Classic Calvinism

One must persevere in faith to be saved.
True believers cannot lose their faith, since it’s God’s gift.
Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.
Those who “lose†their faith never had it to begin with.
God will preserve true believers and they will be saved.
Proponents of the first two approaches quote biblical references, but each must strain to explain away the other group's biblical data. How can an Arminian read Romans 8, then tell true believers that they may screw up and go to hell??? Then again, how can Charles Stanley read Hebrews 6 and 10 and tell unbelievers who once professed faith not to worry, that they will be saved??? Any true biblical teaching must “fit†with ALL the biblical data, without pitting one text against another and without having to explain away a single “jot or tittle†of God's inerrant Word. I believe that only the classical Calvinist model takes into account all of the biblical data.

lesson4im2.jpg

Duccio, Temptation of Christ, 1311

Arminians are right when they say the Bible teaches that only those who persevere will be saved, and they’re right in accusing Antinomians of easy-believism and cheap grace. Antinomians (they wouldn’t use the term) are right in telling committed believers that they are secure in Christ and “once saved, always saved.†But both of these views are wrong in assuming that a true believer can lose his faith and fall away from Christ. Faith is “a gift of Godâ€â€not by works, lest any man boast.†Paul was confident that, since Christ had begun a good work in believers, He would continue that work until completion (Phil. 1). John said that those who fell away were never really true Christians, since true believers don't leave the faith (1 John 2:19).

Scripture teaches that believers must persevere until the end, but also that believers will persevere until the end by God's grace. As the Westminster Assembly concluded, Christians might temporarily yield to Satan's temptations, even to excess, but like Peter when he denied Christ three times, God will still restore and preserve the faith of the Christian, a faith which God gave in the first place! Peter went on to be chief among the apostles!

lesson5ra7.jpg

The Westminster Assembly, Convened by Parliament 1643-47

1. You Must Persevere until the End: God's Requirement of His People

God does not merely command us to begin to believe for a time, and then fall away. He requires us to continue to believe until the end, living lives of repentance and covenant faithfulness. Granted, He does not ask for a perfect faith, but He does ask for a real faith, one that produces real, lasting change.

Colossians 1:21-23
Hebrews 10:26-31
1 John 1:5-10; 3:3-6
Hebrews 12:1
2. You Will Persevere Until the End: God's Preservation of His People

We will persevere because God preserves us. God will keep us from fallingâ€â€not one will be lost of all those who belong to the Son. True believers are not able to leave Christ, for Christ is at work within them.

John 6:38-40
John 10:28-29
Romans 8:28-39
Philippians 1:4-6
Philippians 2:12-13
1 John 2:19
This first set of texts cannot be used to refute the second (Arminianism); nor can the second set of texts be used to refute the first (cheap grace). The point that makes the two compatible is the biblical teaching that faith (while commanded of everyone) is a gift from God to His elect. If faith is simply a human action of a free will, then it can be lost. But if saving faith is God's gift, then it cannot be lost. Can professing Christians fall away? Yes, and they will perish. Can true Christians fall away? No, for they are kept by the invincible power of God in Christ. The Bible teaches us that professing Christians who leave the faith were never truly believers (1 John 2:19; and notice the qualification even in Hebrews 10:39).
lesson6bp2.png

Arminians believe that salvation depeneds on man's effort, at least as much as God's. Iit is a false teaching as Romans 9:16 and all other scripture tells us. :)
 
lesson9px8.png



Predestination & Evangelism
The mistake of God's people has always been to view election as a privilege rather than a responsibility. God warned Israel about this in Deuteronomy 9:6; “Understand, then, that it is not because of your righteousness that the Lord your God is giving you this good land to possess, for you are a stiff-necked people.†Rather, while some were destined to disobedience, we have been chosen so as to “declare the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His wonderful light†(1 Pe 2:8-9). We were predestined in order that we tell others about Christ. Predestination requires evangelism. This was the realization William Carey came to, a realization that drove him around the world to India to spread the good news about Jesus Christ. Carey’s work became the foundation for the modern missions movement, used by God to save millions.

And the Lord does command us to spread the gospel to the whole earth. Obedience is never a bad reason to engage in an activity. The same sovereign God who decreed our salvation also decrees that we should be involved in the process. God has chosen to call out his elect from the nations through the voices of his people. God has not only ordained the end of salvation for his elect. He has also ordained the means by which those elect will be saved.

God will not do without evangelism what he has ordained to do through evangelism. We don’t want to be foolish and think that God will save the nations without the gospel. Indeed, God tells us explicitly otherwise. In Romans 10:13-15, after discussing predestination for two chapters, Paul tells us that unless we send a missionary, no one will be saved. If we don’t send a preacher, no one will preach. And if no one preaches, no one will hear. And if no one hears, no one will believe. And if no one believes, no one will call upon Jesus. And if no one calls upon Jesus (“the Lordâ€Â), no one will be saved. We are God’s eternally designated instruments of eternal life.

Predestination gives us the confidence to talk about the claims of Christ with other people. Predestination encourages evangelism because we can know that the God who sends us into the mission field is the same God who controls whatever happens. He is the same God who is able to turn the most sin-hardened heart to faith in an instant! Their stubborn free wills don’t matterâ€â€God can change them. God could change Paul, the worst enemy of the Christian faith, into the greatest of missionaries in a flash!

And God sovereignly leads us in our evangelism. God could encourage Paul to keep preaching the gospel in Corinth because there were still others appointed to eternal life: “I have many people in this city†(Acts 18:10). Knowing that God is in control and that He can change hearts when we preach the gospel can give us the confidence needed to proclaim Christ with boldness in obedience to the Great Commission (Mt 28:18-20). We have been successful in evangelism when we have communicated the gospel in love and trusted God to do the rest.

lesson11lt6.jpg

William Carey (1761-1834)

We don’t have to persuade anybody. We don’t need to change anybody’s heart. No amount of manipulation will add one soul to the Kingdom of God. We are simply message bearers, and our message is good news to God’s elect! The Holy Spirit converts people. British evangelist C.H. Spurgeon was known to pray, “I believe in the Holy Spirit†as his foot touched each of the many stairs into the pulpit each weekâ€â€Spurgeon would preach the truth; God would change the world. God freely offers all men eternal life if they turn from sin to His Son, and he will enable us to spread that message.

In fact, the doctrine of God’s sovereignty elevates evangelism to a place of ultimate value. The salvation of human souls is a noble motive for evangelism, but an even higher motive is the glory of God. Souls are not ultimate. God’s honor is ultimate. And as we lead other people to join us in worshipping God and honoring him with our lives, God’s name is praised upon earth, and all the creatures in the heavenly realms can witness the glory of God on display. There is no higher good than this, and no more powerful motivation for a life committed to evangelism or missions.

Predestination & Prayer
And the same holds true for the life of prayer. God will not do apart from prayer what he has ordained to do through prayer. Prayer changes things, as James 5:17-18 reminds us. God has given us a central place in carrying out his decrees. Take this as an example:

If God is going to save Sally Elect, he first lays Sally upon the heart of a particularly average believer named Christinaâ€â€Christina Christian. And God leads Christina to pray for Sally and ask God to give her opportunities to talk about Jesus with Sally. God then leads Christina to ask him to give Sally a heart of flesh, to change her heart and give her new life. God burdens Christina to ask Jesus to save Sally. Christina even secretly fasts one day a week as a prayer of reliance on God to save Sally.

lesson12hg8.jpg

C.H. Spurgeon (1834-92)

And God leads Christina to ask her friend Bill to pray for Sally too. Bill gets his whole church praying for Sally, because Bill believes that only the Holy Spirit can truly convert Sally. Neither Bill not Christina try to manipulate Sally, and neither try to hide their own faultsâ€â€they want God’s power displayed in their weakness.

Suddenly God starts bringing Christians into Sally Elect’s life. First a new co-worker, and then Christina, and then Bill.

One day, when Christina has five more things to do than she can possibly finish, she remembers she has some library books overdue and runs into Sally in the library parking lot (What a coincidence!). God leads Sally to mention some things have really been rough in her life recently, and Christina asks, “So how have things been between you and God recently?â€Â

A long conversation develops, and after a few weeks of discussions, God pours out his Spirit upon Sally one evening as she’s thinking about her discussions with Christina, and Sally commits her life to Jesus Christ.

lesson10yc7.png
 
Judy said:
lesson9px8.png



Predestination & Evangelism
The mistake of God's people has always been to view election as a privilege rather than a responsibility. God warned Israel about this in Deuteronomy 9:6; “Understand, then, that it is not because of your righteousness that the Lord your God is giving you this good land to possess, for you are a stiff-necked people.†Rather, while some were destined to disobedience, we have been chosen so as to “declare the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His wonderful light†(1 Pe 2:8-9). We were predestined in order that we tell others about Christ. Predestination requires evangelism. This was the realization William Carey came to, a realization that drove him around the world to India to spread the good news about Jesus Christ. Carey’s work became the foundation for the modern missions movement, used by God to save millions.

And the Lord does command us to spread the gospel to the whole earth. Obedience is never a bad reason to engage in an activity. The same sovereign God who decreed our salvation also decrees that we should be involved in the process. God has chosen to call out his elect from the nations through the voices of his people. God has not only ordained the end of salvation for his elect. He has also ordained the means by which those elect will be saved.

God will not do without evangelism what he has ordained to do through evangelism. We don’t want to be foolish and think that God will save the nations without the gospel. Indeed, God tells us explicitly otherwise. In Romans 10:13-15, after discussing predestination for two chapters, Paul tells us that unless we send a missionary, no one will be saved. If we don’t send a preacher, no one will preach. And if no one preaches, no one will hear. And if no one hears, no one will believe. And if no one believes, no one will call upon Jesus. And if no one calls upon Jesus (“the Lordâ€Â), no one will be saved. We are God’s eternally designated instruments of eternal life.

Predestination gives us the confidence to talk about the claims of Christ with other people. Predestination encourages evangelism because we can know that the God who sends us into the mission field is the same God who controls whatever happens. He is the same God who is able to turn the most sin-hardened heart to faith in an instant! Their stubborn free wills don’t matterâ€â€God can change them. God could change Paul, the worst enemy of the Christian faith, into the greatest of missionaries in a flash!

And God sovereignly leads us in our evangelism. God could encourage Paul to keep preaching the gospel in Corinth because there were still others appointed to eternal life: “I have many people in this city†(Acts 18:10). Knowing that God is in control and that He can change hearts when we preach the gospel can give us the confidence needed to proclaim Christ with boldness in obedience to the Great Commission (Mt 28:18-20). We have been successful in evangelism when we have communicated the gospel in love and trusted God to do the rest.

lesson11lt6.jpg

William Carey (1761-1834)

We don’t have to persuade anybody. We don’t need to change anybody’s heart. No amount of manipulation will add one soul to the Kingdom of God. We are simply message bearers, and our message is good news to God’s elect! The Holy Spirit converts people. British evangelist C.H. Spurgeon was known to pray, “I believe in the Holy Spirit†as his foot touched each of the many stairs into the pulpit each weekâ€â€Spurgeon would preach the truth; God would change the world. God freely offers all men eternal life if they turn from sin to His Son, and he will enable us to spread that message.

In fact, the doctrine of God’s sovereignty elevates evangelism to a place of ultimate value. The salvation of human souls is a noble motive for evangelism, but an even higher motive is the glory of God. Souls are not ultimate. God’s honor is ultimate. And as we lead other people to join us in worshipping God and honoring him with our lives, God’s name is praised upon earth, and all the creatures in the heavenly realms can witness the glory of God on display. There is no higher good than this, and no more powerful motivation for a life committed to evangelism or missions.

Predestination & Prayer
And the same holds true for the life of prayer. God will not do apart from prayer what he has ordained to do through prayer. Prayer changes things, as James 5:17-18 reminds us. God has given us a central place in carrying out his decrees. Take this as an example:

If God is going to save Sally Elect, he first lays Sally upon the heart of a particularly average believer named Christinaâ€â€Christina Christian. And God leads Christina to pray for Sally and ask God to give her opportunities to talk about Jesus with Sally. God then leads Christina to ask him to give Sally a heart of flesh, to change her heart and give her new life. God burdens Christina to ask Jesus to save Sally. Christina even secretly fasts one day a week as a prayer of reliance on God to save Sally.

lesson12hg8.jpg

C.H. Spurgeon (1834-92)

And God leads Christina to ask her friend Bill to pray for Sally too. Bill gets his whole church praying for Sally, because Bill believes that only the Holy Spirit can truly convert Sally. Neither Bill not Christina try to manipulate Sally, and neither try to hide their own faultsâ€â€they want God’s power displayed in their weakness.

Suddenly God starts bringing Christians into Sally Elect’s life. First a new co-worker, and then Christina, and then Bill.

One day, when Christina has five more things to do than she can possibly finish, she remembers she has some library books overdue and runs into Sally in the library parking lot (What a coincidence!). God leads Sally to mention some things have really been rough in her life recently, and Christina asks, “So how have things been between you and God recently?â€Â

A long conversation develops, and after a few weeks of discussions, God pours out his Spirit upon Sally one evening as she’s thinking about her discussions with Christina, and Sally commits her life to Jesus Christ.

lesson10yc7.png

That's the way it works. ;-) We are here to display God's glory and power, not our own. :)
 
lesson15fq8.png



If salvation is all of graceâ€â€if God is God and he has chosen us for salvation even though we did nothing to deserve itâ€â€then we ought to live by the grace we have received. Of course, some of you will look at that and say to yourselves, “Yeah, I really need to do better at living by grace. I’ve really been a failure there. I hope God will forgive me again.†If that’s you, you still don’t get it. Go back and re-read the last seventeen pages and (if you’re a believer) remember that you’re one of the elect!

Our hearts so quickly try to relate to God on a works-basis! It’s our pride, really. I’m convinced that that’s the problem with free-will Arminianism. People naturally process it like this: God requires one work from me, to believe. Once I believe, I’ve done my work and deserve heaven. Of course, in more hard-line Arminian circles, it goes a step further. Unless I’m holy enough, I’ll still go to hell, and maybe I’ve even committed the unpardonable sin and will be damned even if I’m sinlessly perfect from here on out. Legalism. Legalism. Legalism. Such a religion is barely recognizable as Christianity.


lesson16po8.jpg

Rembrandt, Return of the Prodigal Son, 1669
But Calvinists can fall into legalism just as easily. You see, I understand predestination. I’m a superior Christian. I’ve got all my theological “tâ€Âs crossed and my Reformed “iâ€Âs dotted. I sure am close to God. Pride is the Presbyterian’s favorite form of legalism, so watch out! But if God really is for us, and if we had nothing to do with that decisionâ€â€if even our faith was given to us by the Fatherâ€â€then there’s no room for boasting. God’s sovereign choice of us leaves us free from pride. It leaves us aware of our brokenness and humble before God, but all the while confident that his eternal purpose will stand, that we will glory in God forever as objects of his saving mercy. As God’s eternal blessing really begins to sink from our heads into our hearts, we see a new freedom that we never would have imagined when we first encountered the raw, holy, sovereign power of God. Among the newfound freedoms:

1. Freedom from shame, guilt & Insecurity

Read Romans 8:28-39. Nothing can separate you from God’s loveâ€â€nothing in the past, nothing in the future. No one can stand against you. No one can accuse you. Even bad things (“all thingsâ€Â) are working right now to your benefit, to make you more like Jesus. God didn’t choose you because of your faith, and Jesus is not ashamed of youâ€â€even at your worst (Hebrews 2:11). He’s proud to have you in the family, proud to call you brother or sisterâ€â€even knowing what he knows. He’s displaying the glory of his mercy, remember. God’s law is no longer your enemy, but a friend. You can have confidence before God.

2. Freedom from destructive Perfectionism

If God really is for you, then you can quit trying to look good. If you’re trying to be good enough for God, he’s not buying itâ€â€he didn’t choose you because of your great faithfulness. If you’re trying to be good enough for other people, don’t bother. God wants to display his mercyâ€â€that means we have to be broken. God’s glory is not displayed by trying to look like you have it all together. Faith is not a work, and even if it were it still wouldn’t earn you any brownie points. Let God be God. If you won’t show your weakness, then others won’t see God’s power displayed in it.

3. Freedom from legalistic man-made rules

Some of the biggest practical opponents to living by grace are those legalistic little rules that we live by. We love to judge other with themâ€â€they make us look good, and help us feel better about ourselves. (Pride again.) Dress this way, not that way. Wear this much makeup, not that much. Work. Don’t work. Home school is God’s way. Public school is God’s way. Christian school is God’s way. Drink. Don’t drink. Smoke. Don’t smoke. Dance. Don’t dance. This is God’s worship style. If we’re all about God’s glory, there’s no room for any of this. Do whatever you do for God’s glory without comparisons. God has freed you from judging others. You don’t understand God’ sovereign grace until you realize you are a beggar who’s been blessed without cause. You had nothing to do with itâ€â€you’re just a receiver.

4. Freedom from Penance

Even repentance can be a sham if we’re trying to approach God with some vestige of self-reliance. Biblical repentance is a freedom we can enjoy daily, while penance is its counterfeit.

Repentance
Penance

Comes with empty hands
Tries to bargain with God

Acknowledges real sin as against God
Makes excuses for sin

Grieves over displeasing God
Grieves over getting caught

Asks for help to do better
Promises to do better

Is willing to publicly confess, if needed
Is too proud to publicly confess

Relies on God's promises to us
Relies on own promises to God

Turns outward, away from self, to God
Turns inward on self

Produces freedom, joy, and confidence
Produces guilty feelings, anxiety


God has obligated himself to receive any repentant sinner who comes to him. Without this realization, true repentance is impossible. Until we realize that God is for us, we cannot truly be for God.

lesson17fb8.png


lesson18po7.png
 
Here is the thing - God operates out of our frame of reference in regards to time.

God is in eternity past, present and future all at the same "time".

To be quite honest - I do not think that we can completely grasp HOW God has elected or predestined - because we are limited by out understanding and experience of time.

Ultimately, ours is not a responsibility to know "HOW" anyone is saved, elected, or predestined outside of our responsibility to preach the Gospel and make disciples (Matthew 28:16)

My responsibility is to present the Gospel through words and the example of my life. How it all works, is not my responsibility. That's God's job. And I have learned (and continue to learn) that He is AWESOME at His job - and He thankfully helps me do mine.
 
Judy said:
lesson15fq8.png



If salvation is all of graceâ€â€if God is God and he has chosen us for salvation even though we did nothing to deserve itâ€â€then we ought to live by the grace we have received. Of course, some of you will look at that and say to yourselves, “Yeah, I really need to do better at living by grace. I’ve really been a failure there. I hope God will forgive me again.†If that’s you, you still don’t get it. Go back and re-read the last seventeen pages and (if you’re a believer) remember that you’re one of the elect!

Our hearts so quickly try to relate to God on a works-basis! It’s our pride, really. I’m convinced that that’s the problem with free-will Arminianism. People naturally process it like this: God requires one work from me, to believe. Once I believe, I’ve done my work and deserve heaven. Of course, in more hard-line Arminian circles, it goes a step further. Unless I’m holy enough, I’ll still go to hell, and maybe I’ve even committed the unpardonable sin and will be damned even if I’m sinlessly perfect from here on out. Legalism. Legalism. Legalism. Such a religion is barely recognizable as Christianity.


lesson16po8.jpg

Rembrandt, Return of the Prodigal Son, 1669
But Calvinists can fall into legalism just as easily. You see, I understand predestination. I’m a superior Christian. I’ve got all my theological “tâ€Âs crossed and my Reformed “iâ€Âs dotted. I sure am close to God. Pride is the Presbyterian’s favorite form of legalism, so watch out! But if God really is for us, and if we had nothing to do with that decisionâ€â€if even our faith was given to us by the Fatherâ€â€then there’s no room for boasting. God’s sovereign choice of us leaves us free from pride. It leaves us aware of our brokenness and humble before God, but all the while confident that his eternal purpose will stand, that we will glory in God forever as objects of his saving mercy. As God’s eternal blessing really begins to sink from our heads into our hearts, we see a new freedom that we never would have imagined when we first encountered the raw, holy, sovereign power of God. Among the newfound freedoms:

1. Freedom from shame, guilt & Insecurity

Read Romans 8:28-39. Nothing can separate you from God’s loveâ€â€nothing in the past, nothing in the future. No one can stand against you. No one can accuse you. Even bad things (“all thingsâ€Â) are working right now to your benefit, to make you more like Jesus. God didn’t choose you because of your faith, and Jesus is not ashamed of youâ€â€even at your worst (Hebrews 2:11). He’s proud to have you in the family, proud to call you brother or sisterâ€â€even knowing what he knows. He’s displaying the glory of his mercy, remember. God’s law is no longer your enemy, but a friend. You can have confidence before God.

2. Freedom from destructive Perfectionism

If God really is for you, then you can quit trying to look good. If you’re trying to be good enough for God, he’s not buying itâ€â€he didn’t choose you because of your great faithfulness. If you’re trying to be good enough for other people, don’t bother. God wants to display his mercyâ€â€that means we have to be broken. God’s glory is not displayed by trying to look like you have it all together. Faith is not a work, and even if it were it still wouldn’t earn you any brownie points. Let God be God. If you won’t show your weakness, then others won’t see God’s power displayed in it.

3. Freedom from legalistic man-made rules

Some of the biggest practical opponents to living by grace are those legalistic little rules that we live by. We love to judge other with themâ€â€they make us look good, and help us feel better about ourselves. (Pride again.) Dress this way, not that way. Wear this much makeup, not that much. Work. Don’t work. Home school is God’s way. Public school is God’s way. Christian school is God’s way. Drink. Don’t drink. Smoke. Don’t smoke. Dance. Don’t dance. This is God’s worship style. If we’re all about God’s glory, there’s no room for any of this. Do whatever you do for God’s glory without comparisons. God has freed you from judging others. You don’t understand God’ sovereign grace until you realize you are a beggar who’s been blessed without cause. You had nothing to do with itâ€â€you’re just a receiver.

4. Freedom from Penance

Even repentance can be a sham if we’re trying to approach God with some vestige of self-reliance. Biblical repentance is a freedom we can enjoy daily, while penance is its counterfeit.

Repentance
Penance

Comes with empty hands
Tries to bargain with God

Acknowledges real sin as against God
Makes excuses for sin

Grieves over displeasing God
Grieves over getting caught

Asks for help to do better
Promises to do better

Is willing to publicly confess, if needed
Is too proud to publicly confess

Relies on God's promises to us
Relies on own promises to God

Turns outward, away from self, to God
Turns inward on self

Produces freedom, joy, and confidence
Produces guilty feelings, anxiety


God has obligated himself to receive any repentant sinner who comes to him. Without this realization, true repentance is impossible. Until we realize that God is for us, we cannot truly be for God.

lesson17fb8.png


lesson18po7.png

Once we acknowledge that it's Grace and not by our own effort or even desire, then that's the first step against pride. Whatever wisdom, knowledge, intelligence, faith, we have are gifts from God, not form ourselves. As long as we remember just who is responsible for our gifts and good deeds, then we can keep pride at bay. :)
 
Here is a scan from one of Church history books....

THE LITTLE GIANT

John Wesley (1703–1791) came from a home steeped in decency and order. It combined strains of Anglican and Nonconformist piety. His father, the Reverend Samuel Wesley, was a learned and devout high-churchman ministering at Epworth in Lincolnshire. John’s mother, Susanna, was the daughter of a Nonconformist minister in London. She was a remarkable woman who bore nineteen children. John was the fifteenth. She taught them “to fear the rod and cry softly.†Every week she made time for religious instruction for each child separately. To do so, she had to be methodical! John looked to her for guidance to the day other death.
When John was six the rectory at Epworth burned down; he was left alone amid the flames, but he appeared at a second story window, and was rescued by a neighbor standing on the shoulders of another. Thereafter John called himself “a brand plucked from the burning.†He never doubted Gods providential hand upon his life.

At seventeen he was off to Oxford University where he studied first at Christ Church and later at Lincoln College. He found little at Oxford to stimulate his mind or his soul, but he read widely and was especially impressed by the early church fathers and the great devotional classics. The early Greek fathers taught him that the goal of the Christian life was “perfection,†a process of disciplined love, rather than a religious state.
From Jeremy Taylor’s Holy Living, Thomas a Kempis’s Imitation of Christ, and William Law’s Serious Call to a Holy Life, Wesley learned that the Christian life is the consecration of the whole man in love to God and neighbor. These men, he said, “convinced me of the absolute impossibility of being half a Christian. I determined, through His grace, to be all devoted to God.†So he catalogued his weaknesses and established his rules to overcome them.

In 1726 Wesley was elected a fellow of Lincoln College. This gave him not only academic standing at the University but assured him of a steady income. Two years later he was ordained to the Anglican ministry and returned to Epworth for a time to serve as his father’s assistant.
When he resumed his duties at Oxford, he found that his brother, Charles, alarmed at the spread of deism at the University, had assembled a little band of students determined to take their religion seriously. John proved to be just the leader they needed. Under his direction they drew up a plan of study and rule of life that stressed prayer, Bible reading, and frequent attendance at Holy Communion.

The little group soon attracted attention and some derision from the lax undergraduates. “Enthusiasm†at Oxford? Holy Club, they called them; and Bible moths, Methodists, and Reforming Club. The Methodist label is the one that stuck.

The members of the little society were ardent but restless souls. They found fresh enthusiasm when a townsman or new student joined them, such as the bright and brash undergraduate from Pembroke College, George Whitefield. But they were constantly in search of ways to make their lives conform to the practice of early Christians. They gave to the poor, and they visited the imprisoned. But John was quick to confess that he lacked the inward peace of a true Christian. God must have something more in mind.
Then came the invitation to Georgia. A friend, Dr. John Burton, suggested that both John and Charles could serve God in the new colony led by General James Oglethorpe. Charles could be the General’s secretary and John a chaplain to the colony. John welcomed a chance to preach to the Indians so the brothers boarded the Simmonds in October with youthful idealism and missionary zeal, totally unaware of the storms on sea and soul just ahead.

The whole Georgia episode proved to be a fiasco. John discovered that the noble American savages were “gluttons, thieves, liars and murderers.†And his white colonists deeply resented his rigid highchurch ways, his refusal to conduct the funeral of a Nonconformist, and his prohibition of the ladies’ fancy dresses and gold jewelry in church.

John’s frustrations were compounded by his pitiful love affair with Sophy Hopkey, the eighteen-year-old niece of Savannah’s chief magistrate. Wesley was so mixed up emotionally and spiritually that he didn’t know his own mind. Sophy finally resolved the affair by eloping with John’s rival. The jilted lover then barred her from Holy Communion, and her incensed husband sued John for defaming Sophy’s character. The trial dragged out and after six months of harassment, Wesley fled the colony in disgust.
On his way home, he had a chance to ponder the whole experience. “I went to America,†he wrote, “to convert the Indians, but, oh, who shall convert me?â€Â

THE HOLY HEART WARMING
He landed back in England on 1 February 1738, sadly discredited and painfully uncertain of his faith and his future. For a dozen years he had been toiling up the path to perfection, striving by the best models he knew to attain true blessedness. And the Georgia mission only revealed his spiritual bankruptcy.

He found one positive experience in the Georgia episode, his contact with the Moravians. He was determined to learn their secret of spiritual power. In London, he met Peter Bohler, a young Moravian preacher who impressed upon Wesley his need of a new birth, a strong personal faith in Christ that would enable him to overcome sin and attain true holiness. Justification by faith, said Bohler, is not merely a doctrine. It is a personal experience of God’s forgiveness. But how, asked Wesley, can faith be given in a moment of time?

He discovered the answer for himself on 24 May 1738, “In the evening,†he wrote, “I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter to nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt that I did trust in Christ, Christ alone, for salvation; and an assurance was given me that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.â€Â

Thus Wesley found the assurance that he had lacked, a sense of purpose that would sustain him for half a century of unparalleled energy. He had discovered his life’s message. He needed now to find his method.
Later that summer Wesley visited the Moravians in their Saxon homeland. He wanted to see firsthand the power of the piety he had witnessed aboard ship and in Georgia. His impressions of Herrnhut were mixed. On the one hand, he met many remarkable people who exemplified “the full assurance of Christian faith.†On the other hand, he was quick to spot the signs of self-righteousness among them. He was especially repelled by the cult of personality that had grown up around their leader, Count von Zinzendorf. “Isn’t the Count all in all?†Wesley asked.

Thus, Wesley and the Moravians soon parted ways. He owed much to them, especially their message of justification by faith and their system of small groups for spiritual growth. But Wesley could not see himself as a Moravian.
Wesley returned to London and resumed his preaching in the churches. His zeal was undiminished, but his results were no more satisfying than before. An inner sense of reality and outward impact were still missing. Then, almost by chance, while walking from London to Oxford he began to read Jonathan Edwards’ account of the recent conversions in Northampton, Massachusetts. It struck Wesley with terrific force. In this instance, the Great Awakening in New England had a direct influence upon the Wesleyan revival in the mother country. In a matter of weeks Wesley was caught up in a similar movement of the Spirit. It started when he received a surprising invitation from a member of the Holy Club.

George Whitefield, nine years younger than John Wesley, had followed him to Georgia in 1738 but returned in the fall of that year to be ordained. Not satisfied with the opportunities given him in pulpits and eager to reach the masses of people, he began in February, 1739, to preach in the open fields near Bristol to coal miners who seldom dared or cared to enter a church. His voice was clear and strong, and his fervent oratory so moved these hardened and weary men that he could see “the white gutters made by their tears†falling down their black cheeks as they emerged from the coal pits.
Whitefield’s preaching was unforgettable. Using startling Images he could make his listeners feel the pain of sin and the terror of hell. Then with tears in his voice he could describe the love of Christ until his audience cried with him for forgiveness. “I would give a hundred guineas,†said the actor David Garrick, “if I could only say Oh! like Mr. Whitefield.â€Â

When the hardened miners of Bristol pled for God’s mercy in such great numbers Whitefield urged Wesley to follow his lead into the open fields. John knew he was no match for Whitefield’s oratory. He spoke as an Oxford scholar and a gentleman. But he hesitated chiefly because he had never dreamed of preaching under the sky. “Having been all my life so tenacious of every point relating to decency and order,†he wrote, “I should have thought the saving of souls almost a sin if it had not been done in a church.â€Â

TO THE FIELDS, TO THE WORLD
In spite of his brother Charles’s opposition, John reluctantly decided to go to Bristolâ€â€more like a martyr than a joyous messenger. As it turned out, “the brand from the burning†was carried across the threshold of his true mission in life. He preached to over 3,000 in the open air and the reaction of these common folk was amazing. Conversions, as real as those in New England, took place on every hand. The Methodist revival had begun.
The effects on Wesley were equally remarkable. Up to this point he was filled with anxiety, insecurity, and futility. After Bristol he was a firebrand for God.

Peter Bohler had exhorted him to “preach faith till you have it and then because you have it, you will preach faith.†At Aldersgate he had passed from virtual to real faith, from hoping to having. Edwards and Whitefield had shown him that the Word rightly preached bears visible fruit. And now, before his eyes, was a harvest of such fruit. He had preached faith until others had it, and now his own was confirmed by theirs!
After that spring of 1739 in Bristol Wesley set out to carry the gospel to the poor wherever they were willing to listen. In June he wrote: “I look upon all the world as my parish; I judge it my bounden duty, to declare unto all that are willing to hear, the glad tidings of salvation.â€Â

He preached in jails to prisoners, in inns to wayfarers, on vessels crossing to Ireland. At a natural amphitheater in Cornwall he preached to 30,000 at once, and when he was refused admission to the Epworth Church he preached to hundreds in the churchyard while standing on his father’s tombstone. In his diary for 28 June 1774, Wesley claims that his minimum mileage per year was 4,500. That means he must have traveled in his lifetime 250,000 miles, ten times around the world! He traveled mostly on horseback, and he soon learned to give the horse plenty of rein so that he could read a book or prepare a sermon on his way to the next town.
In Wesley’s early years of itinerating, the crowds were not always friendly. Rocks and stones or other missiles would come flying at the preacher. Sometimes he was mobbed and beaten by gangs incited by a hostile squire or parson. But Wesley feared no man. By a strange personal magnetism he often awed turbulent crowds, and in time the violence subsided. Before his death, statuettes in China and mementoes of his likeness were produced in large numbers to satisfy public demand.

In 1751 Wesley married Molly Vazeille, the widow of a London merchant, who nursed him back to health after a fall on the ice. He was not an easy man to live with. For two years she tried to travel with him on his hectic rounds, but her health and nerves broke and she left him. As late as 1777 Wesley was considering the possibilities of a reconciliation, but when Molly died in 1781 he was unaware of her death and did not attend the funeral. She had simply married a man who was wed to his mission.

In his tireless preaching Wesley stressed what we now call “Arminian†beliefs; he was the only prominent leader of the Awakening who did. The name came from Jacob Arminius (1560–1609), a Dutch professor who tried to modify the Calvinism of his time. Wesley felt no special debt to Arminius, but he did staunchly oppose Calvin’s doctrine of predestination. He thought the belief made God an arbitrary devil. He insisted that God willed the salvation of all men and that men had enough freedom of will to choose or refuse divine grace.

This conviction brought his friendship with Whitefield to the breaking point. Whitefield defended the doctrine of predestination because it underscored God’s sovereign authority. He felt Wesley’s “Arminianism†dulled the all-important sense of sin. It made men complacent by surrendering the vital concept of an almighty God.

Both men sought to advance the work of the awakening, so they agreed to differ in mutual respect. In Wesley’s sermon at Whitefield’s funeral in 1770, he spoke of the evangelist s “most generous and tender friendship.†But the controversy did lead to two camps among the Methodistsâ€â€Arminian societies following Wesley and Calvinist societies following Whitefield.
THE METHODIST STRUCTURE

Whitefield had no real taste for organization, but Wesley was an administrative genius. Following his trail Methodist “societies†appeared all over England, Ireland, and Wales. These were not yet congregations in our sense of the term. Most of the believers were members of the Anglican Church and Wesley urged them to attend their parish churches for worship and Holy Communion. He was still the devout churchman from Epworth rectory. But his converts found the center of their Christian experience in the Methodist societies where they confessed their sins to one another, submitted to the discipline of their leader, and joined in prayer and song.
Charles Wesley, who had experienced God’s forgiving grace three days before John, wrote over 7,000 hymns and gospel songs for these Methodist meetings. Perhaps his best loved was “Jesus Lover of my Soul.†It was sung in societies all over Britain and America. Some historians believe Charles’s hymns are the revival’s greatest legacy.

Following the Moravian example John divided his societies into smaller groups of twelve or so members called “classes.†The term was from the Latin classis meaning “division†and had no overtones of schools. Wesley originally used them to encourage financial support, a penny a week for the work. But he soon realized that the collector might also serve as the spiritual guide of the sheep and that members of the classes could encourage one another in their Christian experience. The result was the “class meeting†for testimonies, prayer, and spiritual encouragement, a highly successful feature of the Methodist awakening.

As the work grew Wesley decided to employ laymen from the societies and classes as preachers and personal assistants. He carefully avoided calling them ministers and he refused them any authority to administer the sacraments. They were, he said, his personal helpers directly responsible to him in their work, as he was responsible to the Anglican Church.
By 1744 he found it impossible to maintain personal contact with all these preachers. With a few ordained colleagues and still fewer lay preachers, he created the Annual Conference. This gathering helped to shape the policy and doctrine of the movement, however, always as Wesley decided.
He deployed his assistants as a sort of militia, moving them frequently from one assignment to another but insisting on their common task: evangelism and Christian nurture. “We look upon ourselves, not as the authors or ringleaders of a particular sect or partyâ€â€it is the farthest thing from our thoughtsâ€â€but as messengers of God, to those who are Christians in name but heathens in heart and life, to call them back to that from which they are fallen, to real, genuine Christianity.â€Â

Thus by 1748 “the people called Methodistsâ€Ââ€â€like the Pietists in Germanyâ€â€were a church within the church. For the next forty years Wesley .resisted all pressures from his own followers and all charges from Anglican bishops that suggested separation from the Church of England. “I live and die,†he said, “a member of the Church of England.â€Â

Toward the end of his days, however, the needs of the Methodists in America led him to significant steps toward separation. Long before the American cries of “liberty†Wesley had sent Francis Asbury to the colonies and the work had grown. In 1773 the first American Methodist “conference†was held in Philadelphia, but the societies needed ordained leaders. Wesley’s appeals to the Bishop of London proved fruitless so he took matters into his own hands.

Wesley decided to appoint two of his lay preachers, Richard Whatcost and Thomas Vasey, for the American ministry and to commission Dr. Thomas Coke as superintendent of the American Methodists. This was an important breach in Anglican policy. The Methodist Church in America became a new, distinct denomination when the Christmas Conference meeting at Baltimore in 1784 selected Coke and Francis Asbury as superintendents.
Wesley continued preaching almost to the end of his days. He died in London, 2 March 1791, approaching eighty-eight years of age. When the burning brand finally went out, he left behind 79,000 followers in England and 40,000 in North America. If we judge greatness by influence he was among the greats of his times.

After his death the English Methodists followed their American brethren into separation from the Anglican Church. But Wesley’s Impact and the revival he represents carried far beyond the Methodist Church. It renewed the religious life of England and her colonies. It elevated the life of the poor. It stimulated missions overseas and the social concerns of evangelicals in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
 
jgredline said:
Here is a scan from one of Church history books....

THE LITTLE GIANT

John Wesley (1703–1791) came from a home steeped in decency and order. It combined strains of Anglican and Nonconformist piety. His father, the Reverend Samuel Wesley, was a learned and devout high-churchman ministering at Epworth in Lincolnshire. John’s mother, Susanna, was the daughter of a Nonconformist minister in London. She was a remarkable woman who bore nineteen children. John was the fifteenth. She taught them “to fear the rod and cry softly.†Every week she made time for religious instruction for each child separately. To do so, she had to be methodical! John looked to her for guidance to the day other death.
When John was six the rectory at Epworth burned down; he was left alone amid the flames, but he appeared at a second story window, and was rescued by a neighbor standing on the shoulders of another. Thereafter John called himself “a brand plucked from the burning.†He never doubted Gods providential hand upon his life.

At seventeen he was off to Oxford University where he studied first at Christ Church and later at Lincoln College. He found little at Oxford to stimulate his mind or his soul, but he read widely and was especially impressed by the early church fathers and the great devotional classics. The early Greek fathers taught him that the goal of the Christian life was “perfection,†a process of disciplined love, rather than a religious state.
From Jeremy Taylor’s Holy Living, Thomas a Kempis’s Imitation of Christ, and William Law’s Serious Call to a Holy Life, Wesley learned that the Christian life is the consecration of the whole man in love to God and neighbor. These men, he said, “convinced me of the absolute impossibility of being half a Christian. I determined, through His grace, to be all devoted to God.†So he catalogued his weaknesses and established his rules to overcome them.

In 1726 Wesley was elected a fellow of Lincoln College. This gave him not only academic standing at the University but assured him of a steady income. Two years later he was ordained to the Anglican ministry and returned to Epworth for a time to serve as his father’s assistant.
When he resumed his duties at Oxford, he found that his brother, Charles, alarmed at the spread of deism at the University, had assembled a little band of students determined to take their religion seriously. John proved to be just the leader they needed. Under his direction they drew up a plan of study and rule of life that stressed prayer, Bible reading, and frequent attendance at Holy Communion.

The little group soon attracted attention and some derision from the lax undergraduates. “Enthusiasm†at Oxford? Holy Club, they called them; and Bible moths, Methodists, and Reforming Club. The Methodist label is the one that stuck.

The members of the little society were ardent but restless souls. They found fresh enthusiasm when a townsman or new student joined them, such as the bright and brash undergraduate from Pembroke College, George Whitefield. But they were constantly in search of ways to make their lives conform to the practice of early Christians. They gave to the poor, and they visited the imprisoned. But John was quick to confess that he lacked the inward peace of a true Christian. God must have something more in mind.
Then came the invitation to Georgia. A friend, Dr. John Burton, suggested that both John and Charles could serve God in the new colony led by General James Oglethorpe. Charles could be the General’s secretary and John a chaplain to the colony. John welcomed a chance to preach to the Indians so the brothers boarded the Simmonds in October with youthful idealism and missionary zeal, totally unaware of the storms on sea and soul just ahead.

The whole Georgia episode proved to be a fiasco. John discovered that the noble American savages were “gluttons, thieves, liars and murderers.†And his white colonists deeply resented his rigid highchurch ways, his refusal to conduct the funeral of a Nonconformist, and his prohibition of the ladies’ fancy dresses and gold jewelry in church.

John’s frustrations were compounded by his pitiful love affair with Sophy Hopkey, the eighteen-year-old niece of Savannah’s chief magistrate. Wesley was so mixed up emotionally and spiritually that he didn’t know his own mind. Sophy finally resolved the affair by eloping with John’s rival. The jilted lover then barred her from Holy Communion, and her incensed husband sued John for defaming Sophy’s character. The trial dragged out and after six months of harassment, Wesley fled the colony in disgust.
On his way home, he had a chance to ponder the whole experience. “I went to America,†he wrote, “to convert the Indians, but, oh, who shall convert me?â€Â

THE HOLY HEART WARMING
He landed back in England on 1 February 1738, sadly discredited and painfully uncertain of his faith and his future. For a dozen years he had been toiling up the path to perfection, striving by the best models he knew to attain true blessedness. And the Georgia mission only revealed his spiritual bankruptcy.

He found one positive experience in the Georgia episode, his contact with the Moravians. He was determined to learn their secret of spiritual power. In London, he met Peter Bohler, a young Moravian preacher who impressed upon Wesley his need of a new birth, a strong personal faith in Christ that would enable him to overcome sin and attain true holiness. Justification by faith, said Bohler, is not merely a doctrine. It is a personal experience of God’s forgiveness. But how, asked Wesley, can faith be given in a moment of time?

He discovered the answer for himself on 24 May 1738, “In the evening,†he wrote, “I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter to nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt that I did trust in Christ, Christ alone, for salvation; and an assurance was given me that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.â€Â

Thus Wesley found the assurance that he had lacked, a sense of purpose that would sustain him for half a century of unparalleled energy. He had discovered his life’s message. He needed now to find his method.
Later that summer Wesley visited the Moravians in their Saxon homeland. He wanted to see firsthand the power of the piety he had witnessed aboard ship and in Georgia. His impressions of Herrnhut were mixed. On the one hand, he met many remarkable people who exemplified “the full assurance of Christian faith.†On the other hand, he was quick to spot the signs of self-righteousness among them. He was especially repelled by the cult of personality that had grown up around their leader, Count von Zinzendorf. “Isn’t the Count all in all?†Wesley asked.

Thus, Wesley and the Moravians soon parted ways. He owed much to them, especially their message of justification by faith and their system of small groups for spiritual growth. But Wesley could not see himself as a Moravian.
Wesley returned to London and resumed his preaching in the churches. His zeal was undiminished, but his results were no more satisfying than before. An inner sense of reality and outward impact were still missing. Then, almost by chance, while walking from London to Oxford he began to read Jonathan Edwards’ account of the recent conversions in Northampton, Massachusetts. It struck Wesley with terrific force. In this instance, the Great Awakening in New England had a direct influence upon the Wesleyan revival in the mother country. In a matter of weeks Wesley was caught up in a similar movement of the Spirit. It started when he received a surprising invitation from a member of the Holy Club.

George Whitefield, nine years younger than John Wesley, had followed him to Georgia in 1738 but returned in the fall of that year to be ordained. Not satisfied with the opportunities given him in pulpits and eager to reach the masses of people, he began in February, 1739, to preach in the open fields near Bristol to coal miners who seldom dared or cared to enter a church. His voice was clear and strong, and his fervent oratory so moved these hardened and weary men that he could see “the white gutters made by their tears†falling down their black cheeks as they emerged from the coal pits.
Whitefield’s preaching was unforgettable. Using startling Images he could make his listeners feel the pain of sin and the terror of hell. Then with tears in his voice he could describe the love of Christ until his audience cried with him for forgiveness. “I would give a hundred guineas,†said the actor David Garrick, “if I could only say Oh! like Mr. Whitefield.â€Â

When the hardened miners of Bristol pled for God’s mercy in such great numbers Whitefield urged Wesley to follow his lead into the open fields. John knew he was no match for Whitefield’s oratory. He spoke as an Oxford scholar and a gentleman. But he hesitated chiefly because he had never dreamed of preaching under the sky. “Having been all my life so tenacious of every point relating to decency and order,†he wrote, “I should have thought the saving of souls almost a sin if it had not been done in a church.â€Â

TO THE FIELDS, TO THE WORLD
In spite of his brother Charles’s opposition, John reluctantly decided to go to Bristolâ€â€more like a martyr than a joyous messenger. As it turned out, “the brand from the burning†was carried across the threshold of his true mission in life. He preached to over 3,000 in the open air and the reaction of these common folk was amazing. Conversions, as real as those in New England, took place on every hand. The Methodist revival had begun.
The effects on Wesley were equally remarkable. Up to this point he was filled with anxiety, insecurity, and futility. After Bristol he was a firebrand for God.

Peter Bohler had exhorted him to “preach faith till you have it and then because you have it, you will preach faith.†At Aldersgate he had passed from virtual to real faith, from hoping to having. Edwards and Whitefield had shown him that the Word rightly preached bears visible fruit. And now, before his eyes, was a harvest of such fruit. He had preached faith until others had it, and now his own was confirmed by theirs!
After that spring of 1739 in Bristol Wesley set out to carry the gospel to the poor wherever they were willing to listen. In June he wrote: “I look upon all the world as my parish; I judge it my bounden duty, to declare unto all that are willing to hear, the glad tidings of salvation.â€Â

He preached in jails to prisoners, in inns to wayfarers, on vessels crossing to Ireland. At a natural amphitheater in Cornwall he preached to 30,000 at once, and when he was refused admission to the Epworth Church he preached to hundreds in the churchyard while standing on his father’s tombstone. In his diary for 28 June 1774, Wesley claims that his minimum mileage per year was 4,500. That means he must have traveled in his lifetime 250,000 miles, ten times around the world! He traveled mostly on horseback, and he soon learned to give the horse plenty of rein so that he could read a book or prepare a sermon on his way to the next town.
In Wesley’s early years of itinerating, the crowds were not always friendly. Rocks and stones or other missiles would come flying at the preacher. Sometimes he was mobbed and beaten by gangs incited by a hostile squire or parson. But Wesley feared no man. By a strange personal magnetism he often awed turbulent crowds, and in time the violence subsided. Before his death, statuettes in China and mementoes of his likeness were produced in large numbers to satisfy public demand.

In 1751 Wesley married Molly Vazeille, the widow of a London merchant, who nursed him back to health after a fall on the ice. He was not an easy man to live with. For two years she tried to travel with him on his hectic rounds, but her health and nerves broke and she left him. As late as 1777 Wesley was considering the possibilities of a reconciliation, but when Molly died in 1781 he was unaware of her death and did not attend the funeral. She had simply married a man who was wed to his mission.

In his tireless preaching Wesley stressed what we now call “Arminian†beliefs; he was the only prominent leader of the Awakening who did. The name came from Jacob Arminius (1560–1609), a Dutch professor who tried to modify the Calvinism of his time. Wesley felt no special debt to Arminius, but he did staunchly oppose Calvin’s doctrine of predestination. He thought the belief made God an arbitrary devil. He insisted that God willed the salvation of all men and that men had enough freedom of will to choose or refuse divine grace.

This conviction brought his friendship with Whitefield to the breaking point. Whitefield defended the doctrine of predestination because it underscored God’s sovereign authority. He felt Wesley’s “Arminianism†dulled the all-important sense of sin. It made men complacent by surrendering the vital concept of an almighty God.

Both men sought to advance the work of the awakening, so they agreed to differ in mutual respect. In Wesley’s sermon at Whitefield’s funeral in 1770, he spoke of the evangelist s “most generous and tender friendship.†But the controversy did lead to two camps among the Methodistsâ€â€Arminian societies following Wesley and Calvinist societies following Whitefield.
THE METHODIST STRUCTURE

Whitefield had no real taste for organization, but Wesley was an administrative genius. Following his trail Methodist “societies†appeared all over England, Ireland, and Wales. These were not yet congregations in our sense of the term. Most of the believers were members of the Anglican Church and Wesley urged them to attend their parish churches for worship and Holy Communion. He was still the devout churchman from Epworth rectory. But his converts found the center of their Christian experience in the Methodist societies where they confessed their sins to one another, submitted to the discipline of their leader, and joined in prayer and song.
Charles Wesley, who had experienced God’s forgiving grace three days before John, wrote over 7,000 hymns and gospel songs for these Methodist meetings. Perhaps his best loved was “Jesus Lover of my Soul.†It was sung in societies all over Britain and America. Some historians believe Charles’s hymns are the revival’s greatest legacy.

Following the Moravian example John divided his societies into smaller groups of twelve or so members called “classes.†The term was from the Latin classis meaning “division†and had no overtones of schools. Wesley originally used them to encourage financial support, a penny a week for the work. But he soon realized that the collector might also serve as the spiritual guide of the sheep and that members of the classes could encourage one another in their Christian experience. The result was the “class meeting†for testimonies, prayer, and spiritual encouragement, a highly successful feature of the Methodist awakening.

As the work grew Wesley decided to employ laymen from the societies and classes as preachers and personal assistants. He carefully avoided calling them ministers and he refused them any authority to administer the sacraments. They were, he said, his personal helpers directly responsible to him in their work, as he was responsible to the Anglican Church.
By 1744 he found it impossible to maintain personal contact with all these preachers. With a few ordained colleagues and still fewer lay preachers, he created the Annual Conference. This gathering helped to shape the policy and doctrine of the movement, however, always as Wesley decided.
He deployed his assistants as a sort of militia, moving them frequently from one assignment to another but insisting on their common task: evangelism and Christian nurture. “We look upon ourselves, not as the authors or ringleaders of a particular sect or partyâ€â€it is the farthest thing from our thoughtsâ€â€but as messengers of God, to those who are Christians in name but heathens in heart and life, to call them back to that from which they are fallen, to real, genuine Christianity.â€Â

Thus by 1748 “the people called Methodistsâ€Ââ€â€like the Pietists in Germanyâ€â€were a church within the church. For the next forty years Wesley .resisted all pressures from his own followers and all charges from Anglican bishops that suggested separation from the Church of England. “I live and die,†he said, “a member of the Church of England.â€Â

Toward the end of his days, however, the needs of the Methodists in America led him to significant steps toward separation. Long before the American cries of “liberty†Wesley had sent Francis Asbury to the colonies and the work had grown. In 1773 the first American Methodist “conference†was held in Philadelphia, but the societies needed ordained leaders. Wesley’s appeals to the Bishop of London proved fruitless so he took matters into his own hands.

Wesley decided to appoint two of his lay preachers, Richard Whatcost and Thomas Vasey, for the American ministry and to commission Dr. Thomas Coke as superintendent of the American Methodists. This was an important breach in Anglican policy. The Methodist Church in America became a new, distinct denomination when the Christmas Conference meeting at Baltimore in 1784 selected Coke and Francis Asbury as superintendents.
Wesley continued preaching almost to the end of his days. He died in London, 2 March 1791, approaching eighty-eight years of age. When the burning brand finally went out, he left behind 79,000 followers in England and 40,000 in North America. If we judge greatness by influence he was among the greats of his times.

After his death the English Methodists followed their American brethren into separation from the Anglican Church. But Wesley’s Impact and the revival he represents carried far beyond the Methodist Church. It renewed the religious life of England and her colonies. It elevated the life of the poor. It stimulated missions overseas and the social concerns of evangelicals in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

Praise be to God for John Wesley. As Jesus said; "Without my Father, I can do nothing." And neither can the rest of us. :)
 
2083 Six Articles Of Wesley’s Covenant

In 1752 a group of men, including John Wesley, who were nicknamed Methodist, signed a covenant which every man might hang on his study wall. The six articles of the solemn agreement follow:
1. That we will not listen or willingly inquire after ill concerning one another;
2. That, if we do hear any ill of each other, we will not be forward to believe it;
3. That as soon as possible we will communicate what we hear by speaking or writing to the person concerned;
4. That until we have done this, we will not write or speak a syllable of it to any other person;
5. That neither will we mention it, after we have done this, to any other person;
6. That we will not make any exception to any of these rules unless we think ourselves absolutely obliged in conference.
 
Wesley, John (June 17, 1703–March 2, 1791), was an evangelist and religious leader who founded the Methodist denomination. While students at Oxford University, he and his brother Charles formed a scholarly Christian group called, the “Holy Club.†The Wesleys were close friends with George Whitefield, the renowned preacher of the American Great Awakening. In 1738, the Wesleys set sail from England to Georgia to serve as missionaries. During the tumultuous voyage at sea, they observed the faith of the Moravian Christians. There was awakened within them a desire for a more intimate relationship with God, eventually leading them to faith in Christ. Together with George Whitefield, John and Charles Wesley were among the most influential ministers of the 1700’s.
In his journal, John Wesley wrote:
On shipboard, however, I was again active in outward works: where it pleased God, of his free mercy, to give me twenty-six of the Moravian brethren for companions, who endeavored to shew me a more excellent way.
But I understood it not at first. I was too learned and too wise; so that it seemed foolishness unto me. And I continued … trusting in that righteousness whereby no flesh can be justified.
All the time I was at Savannah I was thus beating the air. Being ignorant of the righteousness of Christ, which, by a living faith in him bringeth salvation to every one that believeth, I sought to establish my own righteousness, and so laboured in the fire all my days.
In my return to England, January 1738, being in imminent danger of death, and very uneasy on that account, I was strongly convinced that the cause of uneasiness was unbelief, and that the gaining a true, living faith was the one thing needful for me. …
So that when Peter Boehler, whom God prepared for me as soon as I came to London, affirmed of true faith in Christ … that it has those two fruits inseparably attending it, “Dominion over sin, and constant peace, from a sense of forgiveness,†I was quite amazed, and looked upon it as a new Gospel. …
In the evening, I went very unwillingly to a Society in Aldersgate-Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed.
I felt I did trust in Christ; Christ alone, for salvation; and an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.
On June 11, 1739, in his Journal,, John Wesley wrote:
I look upon the world as my parish.
On February 12, 1772, in his Journal, John Wesley wrote:
That execrable sum of all villainies, commonly called the Slave Trade.
John Wesley wrote as his Rule:
Do all the good you can,
By all the means you can,
In all the ways you can,
In all the places you can,
At all the times you can,
To all the people you can,
As long as ever you can.
John Wesley stated:
My mother was the source from which I derived the guiding principles of my life
 
Heidi said:
Praise be to God for John Wesley. As Jesus said; "Without my Father, I can do nothing." And neither can the rest of us. :)

Heidi
Do you have any Idea Who John Wesley is? Did you read the post...?
 
Back
Top