It instructs you to enslave the poor.
Ephesians 6:5
Timothy 6:1-2
Luke 12:47-48
Eph 6:5 Bondservants, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ;
Eph 6:6 not with eyeservice, as men-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart,
Eph 6:7 with goodwill doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men,
Eph 6:8 knowing that whatever good anyone does, he will receive the same from the Lord, whether he is a slave or free.
Eph 6:9 And you, masters, do the same things to them, giving up threatening, knowing that your own Master also is in heaven, and there is no partiality with Him. (NKJV)
1Ti 6:1 Let as many bondservants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and His doctrine may not be blasphemed.
1Ti 6:2 And those who have believing masters, let them not despise them because they are brethren, but rather serve them because those who are benefited are believers and beloved. Teach and exhort these things. (NKJV)
Clearly both of the above passages
are not commands to enslave the poor. In fact, they are commands for both Christian slaves and masters on how to treat one another. Surely this was something completely new in a society where slaves could outnumber free people. Slavery was a fact of life; the Christian message was about treating slaves in a much better way, and eventually led to the abolition of slavery.
Luk 12:47 And that servant who knew his master's will, and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
Luk 12:48 But he who did not know, yet committed things deserving of stripes, shall be beaten with few. For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more. (NKJV)
This is
a parable in which Jesus is stating that those who knew the Father's will and do not prepare or act according to his will, "shall be beaten with many stripes." This has nothing to do with speaking for or against slavery.
That's a sample. I don't see it as productive to compaire the books both are so barbarically violent from a time we don't need to revisit each with differing justifications that I don't personally buy.
Well, it seems as though you don't actually understand what you are reading, so how can you judge any justifications as to their truth?
Exsample, There are no verses on abortion such a proceedure didn't exsist on the time yet you will there and say to me point blank that abortion is a sin to your gods designs.
You will take a verse and read it in an entirely peculiar way. When there are more verses on jesus personal dislike fig fruit.
This is false as well but I don't know if you are just being facetious. There is no verse that states Jesus didn't like figs. In fact, he likely did like them which is why he wanted one in the first place.
However, the real point here is that abortions did in fact exist back then, and in large numbers. There is also quite possibly a verse against abortion, although the word intended is translated incorrectly. I don't have the reference handy but if I remember, I'll post it.
