Classik
Member
Come on Classik...What's the answer?
Few more tries people.
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Come on Classik...What's the answer?
IMHO PEMDAS always applies to algebra problems. I am sure someone is rolling on the floor waiting for a (Letter) to be assigned to the unknown and the problem fixed with all the approiate Jargon. The need for an unknown number exists without it being stated.But in math, if the parenthesis doesn't exist, it does not exist. period. PEMDAS does not apply to this equation.
The number is not extant anywhere in the original post. And since, as you said, the equations as written can't possibly be right and there is no clue to it being a reality as opposed to a riddle. And riddles don't obey mathematical rules, they are riddles. This was never a math equation.
Your high school teacher or college professor may have told you that, but in practical applications such as engineering or chemistry, it does not. If there are no function parameters like parentheses, the problem is solved consecutively, left to right. You can't have one engineer working a problem the one way, and another doing it differently. There have to be rules, and PEMDAS does not hold up in non-functioned equation designs.IMHO PEMDAS always applies to algebra problems.
Again, that's great in scientific theory. But when math is being used to design airframes or automobiles in which people's lives will be entrusted, one can't afford to be ethereal. Engineering and chemistry problems can't be solved without all the issues being defined appropriately.II am sure someone is rolling on the floor waiting for a (Letter) to be assigned to the unknown and the problem fixed with all the approiate Jargon. The need for an unknown number exists without it being stated.
Jesus is. He doesn't need to be defined or equated, because any such efforts within the parameters of man's knowledges would fail miserably.IJesus is in parenthesis without the parenthesis existing. Our attention is dirested toward Jesus Christ. The exponent of Jesus saving work is very high too. LOL
eddif
I guess I did not notice this is a general discussion. I seek James 3:17 type math problems, and am hopefully out of touch with any other type.Your high school teacher or college professor may have told you that, but in practical applications such as engineering or chemistry, it does not. If there are no function parameters like parentheses, the problem is solved consecutively, left to right. You can't have one engineer working a problem the one way, and another doing it differently. There have to be rules, and PEMDAS does not hold up in non-functioned equation designs.
Again, that's great in scientific theory. But when math is being used to design airframes or automobiles in which people's lives will be entrusted, one can't afford to be ethereal. Engineering and chemistry problems can't be solved without all the issues being defined appropriately.
Jesus is. He doesn't need to be defined or equated, because any such efforts within the parameters of man's knowledges would fail miserably.
Solve if u r a genius ! 11 x 11 = 4 ; 22 x 22 = 16; 33 x 33 = ???
Show work. Justify?i am not a genius, but it seems like the answer is 64 or 256
Blessings
So where do you get 30.25? How do you know to include it in the equation, and more importantly, how to include it?
Lots of attempts here but notice that there are 3 question marks at the end. Are the question marks place holders? We assume that is the case.Solve if u r a genius ! 11 x 11 = 4 ; 22 x 22 = 16; 33 x 33 = ???
4^1 = 4Well I wonder?
Would not 36; show an ongoing progression of answers? But your suggestion of 6;4 would terminate the progression of answers (?).
Mississippi folks just do not know for sure, but just wondering.
eddif
See posts #45 & #48.Here's my take:
11 x 11 = 121 --> 1+2+1 = 4
22 x 22 = 484 --> 4+8+4 = 16
33 x 33 = 1089 --> 1+0+8+9= 18
Anyone else think that's correct?
11x11=121(1+2+1)=4
22*22=484(4+8+4)=16
33*33=1089(1+0+8+9)=18
The answer is 18!!
I believe this method is more straight forward