T.O.E and original sin..

Discussion in 'Dead Threads' started by Cygnus, Jun 12, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. reba

    reba Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2010
    Messages:
    45,885
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Christian:
    Yes
    With out getting real technical God tells us in Genesis He took a week ...
     
    jasonc likes this.
  2. calvin

    calvin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2016
    Messages:
    415
    Hello calvin here.
    My understanding of the Psalm passage you offered is that the beauty and majesty of those trees that the Lord created do sing His praises.
    You can not see this?
     
    Edward likes this.
  3. calvin

    calvin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2016
    Messages:
    415
    What took Him so long do you suppose?
     
  4. reba

    reba Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2010
    Messages:
    45,885
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Christian:
    Yes
    He wanted to drive all of us nuts .. :) Give us something to debate over.... Maybe he wanted us to use the brains He gave us :shrug

    I believe in His Resurrection as written why not the Beginning?
     
    Not_Now.Soon and Edward like this.
  5. Cygnus

    Cygnus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,603
    Barbarian, once again you're shown you don't really get it.
    Only the evolutionism-minded use the line...."You're expecting the Bible to be a science book". Pretty much a straw man argument.
    The description of the creation event completely rules out evolutionism.

    So, DNA comes from the dust...not bad, I see where your trying to go. But, you can't take the DNA = dust portion literally and then throw away rib = Eve mentioned a few verses later.
     
  6. Knotical

    Knotical Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    5,527
    Location:
    Armpit of California
    Christian:
    Yes
    The only test a Godly scientist should employ is that if the conclusion they have come to is not backed by scripture it must be dismissed as false. Of course many people will have a problem with that idea, but that is really the only true test anything could be measured by in order to hold to the full Counsel of God.
     
    Not_Now.Soon likes this.
  7. Barbarian

    Barbarian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    26,553
    Christian:
    Yes
    Ah, so it's not literal singing, it's figurative. Got it. Now let's look at the same sort of thing in Genesis...
     
  8. Barbarian

    Barbarian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    26,553
    Christian:
    Yes
    If science and scripture seem to be at odds, then you have misunderstood one or both of them. And either error is equally likely. It is a mistake to assume that one's opinion of scripture is perfectly accurate and cannot be wrong.
     
  9. calvin

    calvin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2016
    Messages:
    415
    Hello calvin here.
    With respect, you seem to think only in human terms. If you had the ability to hear as the Lord hears perhaps you would understand that He has a connection with all of His creation that we are mostly in ignorance of.
    Have you considered that though He hears us, He likely does not hear the mechanical vibrations in the air caused by our vocal chords, but he knows the deepest guarded thoughts we think.
    We should not try to reduce God to the level of man by thinking He has our limitations.
    Consider:Job 38:41 Who provides for the raven its prey, when its young ones cry to God for help, and wander about for lack of food? Esv
    Mat 21:19 And seeing a fig tree by the wayside, he went to it and found nothing on it but only leaves. And he said to it, “May no fruit ever come from you again!” And the fig tree withered at once.Esv
     
    Edward likes this.
  10. Knotical

    Knotical Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    5,527
    Location:
    Armpit of California
    Christian:
    Yes
    When it comes down to taking one or the other I will always side with scripture. And it is a Christian's duty to garner a comprehensive understanding of scripture and not just "lean on our own understanding." Allow iron to sharpen iron, and when that happens you can be more confident in your faith in the Truth of the bible, and not the ever changing sands that is scientific discovery.
     
    calvin likes this.
  11. Edward

    Edward Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,471
    Location:
    USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    What makes you think it's figurative? Even a carnal point of view would allow for the possibility of the singing might even be at a frequency that human ears can not hear, like dogs can hear things humans cant. Besides, that's not what the man said, so quit twisting his words.

    I can agree with this, but have a question...how come I've never seen you express the possibility that you yourself could be wrong about something?
     
  12. Cygnus

    Cygnus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,603
    Yes, it wasn't a literal fall in the garden.....it was only figurative. Right
    Barbarian?
     
  13. Cygnus

    Cygnus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,603
    Bible: Eve was created from Adams rib.
    Evolutionism: Eve was the product of a lesser primate.

    Here science and scripture seem to be at odds.
     
  14. civilwarbuff

    civilwarbuff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    5,753
    Maybe some people believe the fall means Adam tripped over a rock or something; I mean he was walking around without shoes.....
     
  15. Cygnus

    Cygnus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,603
    I'm sure there are several people who post here will find the need o argue over the word "fall" rather than addressing the real issue.
     
  16. Barbarian

    Barbarian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    26,553
    Christian:
    Yes
    I'm pointing out that literalism is the result of only thinking in human terms.

    We should not try to reduce God to the level of man by thinking He has our limitations.
     
  17. Barbarian

    Barbarian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    26,553
    Christian:
    Yes
    That would be taking Biblical literalism to a new extreme. "Fall" isn't meant to be taken literally just as the rib isn't meant to be taken literally.

    To focus on such things is to miss the point God is making in Genesis.
     
  18. Barbarian

    Barbarian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    26,553
    Christian:
    Yes
    When science and scripture appear to one to conflict, it is the result of misunderstanding one or both of them. And either error is equally likely.

    Instead of adding new doctrines to make it harder for unbelievers to come to him, focus on the message. It's not about body parts or how long He took to get creation to this point. Let Him be God, and listen to what He has to say to you.
     
  19. calvin

    calvin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2016
    Messages:
    415
    Well if you were wanting to convey information to humans, what would you do? Would you send them an E-mail encrypted and full of binary trinary arithmatic?
    Err ahhh I think you might have borrowed that wisdom from my post #89
    I'm truly gratified that you see the worth of my thinking and are adopting it as your own. There is hope yet:crossed
     
  20. Cygnus

    Cygnus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2016
    Messages:
    2,603
    Yes Barbarian....I added all kinds of stuff to the Bible when I saw Eve was formed from Adams rib.
     
    civilwarbuff likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page