Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

The Difference

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,048.00
Goal
$1,038.00
It seems as though you are not at all following the discussion. Blessedsmithereens first stated: "Besides that, 1 Peter has for years had its critics in the Apologetics community of PhD's ."

I simply asked for clarification as to how that was relevant to the discussion, and for which I still await an answer. Your first link above had nothing to do with the discussion. The second is just a link to a search you did but doesn't bring any clarity to my question. Unless you can read minds or are blessedsmithereens in disguise, you cannot clarify their statement.
I think they are trying to help educate what refuses to actually accept what has already been written.
Adding that I think it is against the rules to imply someone here is also someone else. Don't do that. It doesn't look good.


Lol! You mean reason?
No, that's not it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think they are trying to help educate what refuses to actually accept what has already been written.
This is not a grammatically correct sentence, so I don't understand what you're trying to say. I asked a simple question which should have a simple answer, yet, after a couple of pages I have yet to get one.

Adding that I think it is against the rules to imply someone here is also someone else. Don't do that. It doesn't look good.
And anyone who has an understanding of English knows exactly what I was saying and that in no way implied anything.

No, that's not it.
It's seeming like it more and more, as you have yet again not even tried to answer my question. You would rather deal with irrelevant side issues than address my question.
 
Back
Top