If I have your point backward, then I do apologize. I read your post as trying to support the Futurist view of us rising as physical, human beings. If I read your post correctly, then the following applies and please understand that the asterisks, caps and exclamation marks are, as I normally do, used for emphasis and not shouting.
Yes he was!
"Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God..." - 1Cor15:50
I agree with Paul because;
If you still have flesh on and are not wearing your incorruptible, immortal body like Jesus has, the Jesus Christ has not returned!
Like Jesus *HAS*? Really, you do not know the body that He *HAS*. You know the body that He *HAD* before He ascended, which may not be identical. Remember, the Scripture says, "for then we shall see Him as He *is*".
Now why would the writer say that, if they already knew how He would appear, having seen Him before His ascension, if He were the same? It wouldn't have been a mystery. And Paul also wrote, "I tell you a mystery...". So apparently, things would be *different*, not the same as what they had already seen, since these things were still "a mystery" to the church in general. Paul obviously knew what would happen and so, was telling them. But exactly how Jesus would "appear" was as of yet unknown at that time. And if what they already saw of Him was what He would be when He "appeared", then it would not be an unknown, as it was clearly stated to be. It says, "we SHALL see Him as He is", not "we DID see Him as He is".
Also, Futurism says that He's still flesh and blood (even though Jesus Himself left out the word "blood" and specifically said "flesh and bone"), but the truth is, that we simply don't know how much transformation His body had taken yet, nor how much it had taken once He was ascending. Remember, He "disappeared from their sight".
What we do know, is that Jesus seemed to appear and disappear at will and that physical human beings don't do that, even though Criss Angel would like you to believe that they do.
But spiritual beings did do that throughout the Old Testament, only *appearing* human for the sake of the viewer. That does not make them flesh and blood human beings. And angels, for example, never were, yet appeared that way to humans, when they wanted to and the Scriptures are clear that Jesus is in Heaven, which is a spiritual place and therefore, He is a spiritual being.
What they saw of Jesus, they saw before His ascension and also, we should not compare ourselves to Jesus. His body had to rise physically, as a sign and His body was the only one that did not see corruption. Our bodies will corrupt away. And even Jesus said about His own resurrection, that it was "A SIGN" and the sign is never the event itself. Otherwise, it wouldn't be called a sign. It would be called the event.
I would also point out that while you said that your quote "ends all the word twisting", if indeed you are attempting to support the idea of our physical bodies resurrecting and us being flesh and blood humans again, then I would point you to the very same verse you started off with, which I quoted from your post and which clearly and without doubt say that; "flesh and blood canNOT inherit the Kingdom of God". It canNOT be done! So how can any doctrine that says it will be done, be correct? Now you can add whatever words to it you want, but that's all that would be. You adding words (if indeed that is your doctrine). The Scripture *itself* does not say that. It says that flesh and blood can NOT inherit the Kingdom of God.
I would also suggest taking a look at that same chapter, a few verses previous and you will read where Paul makes a difference between a physical body and a spiritual body, when he clearly says; "there is a natural body and there is a spiritual body". And regarding the resurrection, says; "it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body".
What is buried is the human flesh and blood, which does decay away. And what is raised is a spiritual body, which will not.
Paul used the example of farming, which most would certainly be familiar with, needing food and not having a "Super Food Mart" down the road.
And so he used the example of planting a seed. An a seed drops off its shell and it is what is inside that sprouts up out of the ground. And it is our souls; our spiritual selves that sheds our physical bodies, just as Peter said he would "put off this tent" speaking of his own death and it is our spiritual being that goes to Heaven now.
And what else did Paul say in that analogy? Very simple! That "what is sown is not that which shall be raised". What is buried is simply not what is going to rise!
I think we ought to read the Scriptures without seeing our doctrine in them and just let them speak for themselves. And when we have to add words and say things like, "what that really means is...", then we're already on the wrong track! And even just comparing Scripture to Scripture, the examples we see of "spiritual bodies" shows us that they appear to be humans for our benefit, not because they actually are physical human beings.
Anyway, hope this helped and edified those who were interested in this subject and as I said, if I got your point backwards, then please forgive me, I apologize.