this is urgent! if it breaks any rules,... bringing you all the best. top story

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by godswillservices, Oct 27, 2017.

  1. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    I agree the actual Temple can be related to the garden of Eden for that is where God walked with Adam before his fall. It's the same with Abraham. Moses, Jacob, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Mt Sinai as Gods Temple whether an actual building, a mountain or a garden is where the presence of Gods Shekinah glory is before us as He speaks to us.
     
    StoveBolts likes this.
  2. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    I agree the actual Temple can be related to the garden of Eden for that is where God walked with Adam before his fall. It's the same with Abraham. Moses, Jacob, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Mt Sinai as Gods Temple whether an actual building, a mountain or a garden is where the presence of Gods Shekinah glory is before us as He speaks to us.
     
    StoveBolts likes this.
  3. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
  4. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    Satan is buried in isiah 14 ,how is that possible?
     
  5. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
  6. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    I never said Satan was buried in Isaiah 14:11. I am making reference to Satan as the name Lucifer is in vs. 12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! The king did not fall from heaven and cast down to the ground. It's always been Satan who works through others to try and destroy Gods children.
     
  7. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    Lucifer isn't satan nor per the older fathers was he considered lucifer a name .it wasn't until 400 years after the cross that it was.
     
  8. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    Where does it say the older fathers never considered Lucifer a name for the adversary? Then I will have to ask you who Lucifer is in Isaiah 14:12. It doesn't matter what name he is known by as there are many or even if God gave him a name, he is still the adversary that comes against God's children and tempted Jesus in Matthew Chapter 4. Jesus is known by many names, none the less He is the Son of God.
     
  9. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    Statements,Uhm the same exact wording about babylon kimgs.you means you

    Lucifer is Only uses in Latin and not in the Hebrew .

    Jews have no other name for satan like that.

    Read my statements again ,i never said satan wasn't a real being nor an enemy of God only that these two chapters can't be used to support that.

    Context gives you why .

    Is 14 has a chaptee of the king being looked at in the pit and the nation's saying this is the man who weakened the nations?
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2017
  10. Allen Wynne

    Allen Wynne Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    11,824
    Location:
    Inverness, Florida
    Christian:
    Yes
    You say Lucifer is not used in Hebrew, only in Latin.
    Then what word replaces it in Hebrew?
     
  11. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    Not even a name.
    A title. Morning star
     
  12. Allen Wynne

    Allen Wynne Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    11,824
    Location:
    Inverness, Florida
    Christian:
    Yes
    But the Bible clearly states that the Morning Star is Jesus and no one else.
     
    wondering likes this.
  13. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    I know we will not agree and that's fine as I have no problem with that. We have showed both sides of the coin of what we believe and should probably let it rest there. :)
     
  14. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    fair enough. I prefer context to be proper. it doesn't mean I get it right ,
     
  15. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    in that context it isn't.
     
  16. Allen Wynne

    Allen Wynne Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    11,824
    Location:
    Inverness, Florida
    Christian:
    Yes
    They are using the Latin, and in the Latin it is not capitalized Morning Star
    In fact, Daniel B. Wallace states a more appropriate translation would be day star.
     
  17. jasonc

    jasonc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,649
    Christian:
    Yes
    that means we agree. the context of the chapter couldn't be the Morning Star as that means Jesus would have to fall from Heaven and be judged.
     
    Allen Wynne likes this.
  18. StoveBolts

    StoveBolts Staff Member Tech Support

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    11,601
    Location:
    Michigan
    Here is an alternate view....
    http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/15945/jewish/Chapter-14.htm#showrashi=true
     
  19. Free

    Free Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    13,157
    Location:
    AB, Canada
    There simply is nothing within the contexts of either Isa. 14 or Eze. 28 to even remotely suggest that there are dual meanings, never mind a second meaning that refers to Satan. One has to read that into the texts.

    As I stated previously and has been argued by others, there is no being in the Bible with the name "Lucifer." Even if there was, one would still have to read into that name that it is speaking of Satan.
     
    jasonc likes this.
  20. for_his_glory

    for_his_glory Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,294
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Christian:
    Yes
    Thank you for the site as I forgot I had studied this a long time ago and found this in my notes.

    Concerning the word Lucifer the King James took the Latin Vulgate word Lucifer which in Latin means the morning star meaning the planet of Venus. Has nothing to do with Jesus being called bright and morning star in Rev 22:16 as the use of those words are different. Lucifer is considered a Greco-Roman pagan god and has nothing to do with Satan, Devil or what other names this fallen angel is called by.

    morning star son of the dawn - NIV
    Lucifer son of the morning - NKJV
    shinging star of the dawn - James Moffatt
    Day star Son of Dawn - The Jerusalem Bible
    Lucifer son of the morning - KJV

    In the Roman language Lucifer was the name given to the morning star Venus as Venus was considered a pagan god. The morning star appears in the sky just before dawn. In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can be translated as Day star, son of the Dawn. Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor Day star, son of the Dawn, as Lucifer, and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place from the Latin in that of interpreting Lucifer into a fallen angel now named Satan. In the original Hebrew day star, son of the dawn is used, but not for that of Satan, but for the king of Babylon. Isaiah is using this metaphor for a bright light, though not the greatest light (Jesus) to illustrate the apparent power of the Babylonian king which then faded.

    The name Satan comes from a Hebrew word sah-TAHN which means adversary as in signifying an enemy, and an accuser, father of lies.

    Isaiah 14:12-15 Ezekiel 28:14,15 is prophetically directed to the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre, but also meant to include someone apart from humans as being refered to as an anointed cherub or son of the morning that has always been our adversary starting with his fall from God's favor, but still has access to heaven as he presents himself before God to accuse the brethren before Christ, Job 2:1,2; Rev 12:10, until Michael wars against him and kicks him out of heaven with all his unholy angels, Rev 12:7-9. It was Satan (or whatever one wants to call this fallen angel as God never gave him a name that I know of who worked through the serpent who tempted Adam and Eve and also tempted Jesus in Matthew 4:1-11. Some might ask why would God let Satan into the garden already knowing what would happen and the answer is because it was God's will as being our Father knows we will fail at times, but as any parent, wants us to grow from the mistakes we make as we take responsibility for our actions.
     

Share This Page