Who is the "angel of the Lord"?
Fellow believers: I know there is a tendency to "label" others, if their interpretation is different, but, the final meaning of some subject or doctrine should be what the Scriptures teach, period.
For your info, I am not a JW or Mormon. I belong to an independent Presbyterian Church in Southern Calif. But, while a "member" I disagree with their Reformed Theology, which is a-millenialism.
My point regarding the literal meaning of "malak"- Heb. and "angellos"- Gk., is this: many of those appearances of a spirit being thought to be God, could very well be Christ, the Word. But, the compilers of the English OT from the Hebrew, could just as well have translated "malak" as "agent" or "messenger" rather then "angel". Since "angel" is based on the Greek, why didn't they transliterate from the Hebrew, and call it "the malak of the Lord"?
Anyway, to me, Christ before the incarnation, was not an angel, one of the many created spirit beings who perform as messengers of God.
Further, all things were created through Christ; He created all spirit beings.
Col.1:14-16, CV, "..in Whom we are having the deliverance, the pardon of sins, Who is the Image of the invisible God, First born of every creature, for in HIm is (the) all created, that in the heavens and on the earth, the visible and the invisible."
Finally, the context must be considered, whether to translate it "angel"--a created being, or "messenger" or "agent", which, to me, would be the right choice.
Bick