Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

[_ Old Earth _] Why the Fossil Strata Theory is a remarkable Hoax

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$905.00
Goal
$1,038.00
M

MrVersatile48

Guest
This chapter is based on pp. 497-605 of Origin of Life (Volume Two of our three-volume Evolution Disproved Series).

Not included in this chapter are at least 472 statements by scientists. You will find them, plus much more, on our website: http://evolution-facts.org.

This is the largest and one of the most important chapters in this book.

Fossil remains provide evolutionists with their only real hope of finding evidence that evolution might have occurred in the past.

If the fossils do not witness to evolution in the past, then it could not be occurring now either...

As I said earlier, there are millions of 'missing links' - between every supposed stage - despite the billions spent in futile search for what doesn't exist

I challenged Prof Dawkins on http://bbc.co.uk/liverpool in Jan '06 - to come to http://chesterzoo.org - & point out the many missing transitional forms needed for him to be right

He can't

He aint
 
.-~'*Bump*'~-.

Anyone have anything else they would like to add?
 
With every new fossil we find, two more missing links are made! Evilutionists can't win! :)
 
I contend that because there isn't a photograph of you from every day of your life, that when shown all the pictures of you that there are, each one is completely independent from the rest.
 
proponent said:
I contend that because there isn't a photograph of you from every day of your life, that when shown all the pictures of you that there are, each one is completely independent from the rest.

Who said this? Dawkins?
 
johnmuise said:
proponent said:
I contend that because there isn't a photograph of you from every day of your life, that when shown all the pictures of you that there are, each one is completely independent from the rest.

Who said this? Dawkins?
I did, just then, because that's what this argument of 'missing links' sounds like to me. It's stupid to say that if there is 1 missing link the entire theory is broken. Not ever bone is fossilized in a way that can be found.
 
proponent said:
johnmuise said:
proponent said:
I contend that because there isn't a photograph of you from every day of your life, that when shown all the pictures of you that there are, each one is completely independent from the rest.

Who said this? Dawkins?
I did, just then, because that's what this argument of 'missing links' sounds like to me. It's stupid to say that if there is 1 missing link the entire theory is broken. Not ever bone is fossilized in a way that can be found.

Dawkins said this in a debate almost word for word.

Also there is no missing links...just missing chains.
 
Back
Top