Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Women Wearing Pants?

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$905.00
Goal
$1,038.00
But, at some point some men need to realize that a modestly dressed woman has done her part... and if he is still "made weak" by women dressed like this:

View attachment 3109

or this:

View attachment 3110

the he has a problem that he needs to deal with. Christian women should not be expected to wear burkas just because there are some guys who have no self control and/or have a dirty mind.
Well, I have a "dirty mind", but I also have self-control.

Besides...
I don't care HOW a female dresses, I still know she's female. ;)

(And SOMEONE better pass a rule against women putting their hand on their hip/waist like the three in the top picture and the two in the bottom picture - cause THAT is distracting, too. I'll post all the other stuff that should be banned when I get time - my point is, the pants/dress/jeans issue misses the mark badly -it leaves out all sorts of other 'problems'.)
 
Previous humor of mine aside, I think the gist of Duet 22:5 is that a preson should not be a cross-dresser or any other transgender behavior as we would call it today. The crux of that passage is that a person is not to make themselves look like the opposite sex (with the assumed purpose) to deceive.

It has nothing to do with "pants" being "man's clothes" and therefore women can't wear them. Most women will still go into the woman's department to buy their slacks or jeans and even if they wear the husband's jeans to help him do the outdoor work for example, it's not with the intention of looking like him or becoming him, and as such is not a cross-dresser.

The issue is clearly about one not being happy with what God has made them as a man and a woman were created to become one flesh (i.e. produce an offspring being one human) and marriage was between them. Dressing up to look like a woman and fooling a male date (or vice versa) only to see him have a heart attack when he gets the "woman" home. That, I have to say, is terrible and wrong.

So, let's not all stress out over this issue about pants. There's men's pants and there's women's pants because the body contour is different and thus they are cut to fit the appropriate sex, OK?
 
Felix,

I'm certainly not denying that Deuteronomy speaks of abominations... It wouldn't surprise me that if homosexuality is decried as abomination before God, so would transvestism. Both are similiar in that they go exactly opposite of how God made men and women to be.

The only thing that I deny, and I assume that this is what you see a need for "more study" on, is that western feminine attire is no more "male" than eastern feminine attire. As you've shown, the issue isn't skirts or pants... just as a skirt can be masculine attire, so can pants be feminine.

As for this:

[21] It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor [[***any thing]] whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak. (womens dress/less/ness comes to mind!)
[22] Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.

I certainly agree that Christian's are to dress modestly, and I also agree that modest dress has been an issue, even within the church lately. Not just Christian women either... those shorts that men wear that come just a bare hairsbreadth above their privates or pants so baggy their underwear show is just as much a violation of modest dress as girls with spaghetti strap tanks and short shorts.

But, at some point some men need to realize that a modestly dressed woman has done her part... and if he is still "made weak" by women dressed like this:

View attachment 3109

or this:

View attachment 3110

the he has a problem that he needs to deal with. Christian women should not be expected to wear burkas just because there are some guys who have no self control and/or have a dirty mind.
________

Elijah here, sorry, when 'i' read this other post it seems that it got me confused? I thought that you might be looking for a 'spiritual' :fight
But this above post seems to agree with what a couple of us had posted up, huh? :chin;)
This is what you said, right??

Re: Women Wearing Pants?
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by handy
When people go on about what an abomination simple and modest pants are... when they are not even following the dress codes for men in the Old Testament, it also smacks of hypocrisy...

Deuteronomy 22 (notice, same chapter):11-12
<sup class="versenum">11 </sup>“ You shall not wear a material mixed of wool and linen together.
<sup class="versenum">12 </sup>“ You shall make yourself tassels on the four corners of your garment with which you cover yourself."


How about it Elijah and Felix... do you have the tassels on the corners of your garments? Ever mix materials?

_______________________________________

 
Me? Looking for a spiritual donneybrook? Moi? The very idea....

:lol

In post 140, Elijah, I've only said what I have been saying for quite some time now... that cross dressing is an abominiation, but the mere fact that a woman would wear pants hardly qualifies as cross dressing and that pants are every bit as feminine attire as the robes of the OT were men's attire.

The post you quote, post 111, is more of a response to statements that you make such as this:

Perhaps what we have today is not just more of satan's creeping cancer? I wonder how much further pastors will remain still with the way that their wives will dress.. or un/dress???


I've known a fair bit of pastor's wives over the years... and I've seen some on TV as well... however, I've never seen a pastors wife who was immodest or worthy of the taunt of "un/dress". Perhaps there are some out there... but I would imagine that they are few and far between and would hazard that there is probably much more than just the way they dress that is amiss in their lives.
 
What's the problem with India treating women?
  • The national ruling party leader is a woman.
  • The current president of India is a woman.
  • My native state's chief minister is a woman.
There are 3000 castes who never intermarry, has more than 800 languages (not dialects) and 30 official languages with each state has it's own language. It is so huge and has more population than Europe and US combined and the entire Australia lives in a single metro. So, when something happens in one particular community in one particular area, it is immature to blame the entire sub-continent.

Non-responsive.
Anyway I was just trying to point out that people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
 
Well, I have a "dirty mind", but I also have self-control.

Besides...
I don't care HOW a female dresses, I still know she's female. ;)

(And SOMEONE better pass a rule against women putting their hand on their hip/waist like the three in the top picture and the two in the bottom picture - cause THAT is distracting, too.
I'll post all the other stuff that should be banned when I get time - my point is, the pants/dress/jeans issue misses the mark badly -it leaves out all sorts of other 'problems'.)

Wow, I would never have imagined there was something wrong with this.
:chin

(I still don't.)
 
Back
Top