[_ Old Earth _] World-Views: Evolutionism and Biblical

[Stone-yarder]

You are right.
Christians like you are needed to explain this to other Christians, because the Christian message of importance does not pend upon how Genesis had been explained by the former church fathers.

I know well meaning Christians think they do God a service by attacking science which shows Genesis could not be understood the way it has been explained since the Middle Ages and be called the truth.
This idea that by shear numbers and stubborn insistance, Science will lose has a record now that beliues such stradegy.

The church has half the attendance on Sunday while Bill Maher and the comedians have found an audience and the college campuses have locked the preachers out.
The hand writing is on the wall.

It says, "ToE, ToE, N, Genesis.

The RCC remembers the Reformation that came in the wake of its own idenical decisiuon to oppose the truth found in Empirical Science.
That RCC church had violated what Paul said concerning the old Platonian and Aristotlian "science" that the RCC had used to support their Bible interpretations and sermons.
Even with the ancient astrologically based wisdoms of the phuiloso[hical descriptions of the world on their side, the RCC was cut in half by the Empirical Knowledge that all could see in that Age just past.

The Pope has accepted ToE, because in his archives, he remembers.
The Protestant Fundamentals did not have that same experience, yet.

Your open mindedness to re-read Genesis, Geology, and all the academics that will support a different christian explanation that coincides with what we now know is just what the churches need to hear today.

Have you ever considered the possibility that maybe you are wrong?

 

[Arch Angle]

every second of every day.

 

[cupid dave]

Have you ever considered the possibility that maybe you are wrong?

I am encouraging such considerations by all of us.

In this new age of Information when knowledge abounds and men can run to and fro across the world, do you doubt me, and also these great fathers of your individual church?

Charles Taze Russell, Smith,Luther, Campbell, John Wesley, Roger Williams, von Below , John knox, etc.




We can all at our computer examine what the 12 major mainstream denominational christian churches have told their followers to support in regard to what they have or have not studied for themselves in Genesis.
We can see that those teachings emanate from ancient (and even medieval roots), long before the science we understand could have been used to conform with Genesis.

My question is if you doubt me, do you ever doubt these men who set what you do accept in the stone of their churches: