This was a good passage you posted from 1 Chronicles.
1 Chronicles 28:9
“And you, Solomon my son, know the God of your father, and serve him with a whole heart and with a willing mind; for the Lord
searches all hearts, and understands every plan and thought.
If you seek him,
he will be found by you; but
if you forsake him,
he will cast you off for ever.
The passage seems to indicate a condition.
I am starting a study on the Parables. Klyne R. Snodgrass, in his book, "Stories with Intent" brings up these issue with the Parable of the lost sheep (Matthew 18:12-14 and Luke 15:4-7)
Issues Requiring Attention
1. What are the original form and context of the parable? Is Matthew or Luke closer to the words of Jesus and the original Sitz im Leben? What significance does the relation of the two have for understanding?
2. Would a shepherd abandon the ninety-nine other sheep? What relevance does this decision have for understanding the parable?
3. Has the parable been framed on one or more OT texts? Specifically, is Bailey
correct to see Luke 15 as an expansion of Psalm 23?
4. Do the features represent theological realities? Should the shepherd be identified with God, Jesus, the disciples, or someone seeking the kingdom? Does the parable have christological implications?
5. What is to be learned here about repentance? Do some not need repentance?
6. What does the parable teach?
Snodgrass Notes:
A lost sheep, we are told, usually lies down and gives up and will not find its way back. 32 Possibly this is why the shepherd carries the sheep on his shoulders, but more likely it is intended to convey the care of a good shepherd. Images of shepherds carrying sheep are known from the various cultures long before Jesus. 33 Repentance is a central pillar of Jewish thinking. 34
Conclusion:
3. Has the parable been framed on one or more OT texts? Specifically,
OT shepherd imagery frequently refers to God or to leaders of God’s people. Ezekiel 34 is particularly striking because of the similarity of some phrases to the wording of the parable. Whereas Matthew and Luke differ in describing the one sheep as having strayed or become lost, Ezek 34: 4, 16 uses both words (planaō and apollymi) in parallelism to describe lost sheep. Ezekiel 34 mentions sheep wandering on the mountains and hills (v. 6) and says that God himself will search for his sheep (v. 11), care for them (v. 16), judge their oppressors (vv. 17, 20, and 22), and set a Davidic shepherd over them to care for them (vv. 23-24). In addition, God will judge the
shepherds who have failed to care for the sheep. Other texts have the same thoughts and hopes that God will shepherd his people and/ or appoint a Davidic deliverer to shepherd them. Ezekiel 34 is only one of several texts carrying this shepherd theology. 58 Whether the connection is to Ezekiel 34 or to the larger shepherd tradition cannot be determined with certainty, but at the very least the parable has been framed on the OT shepherd tradition which Ezekiel 34 expresses so forcefully. 59 This underscores the importance of the OT in the formation of the parables, but two other important results emerge. First, this parable is an implicit complaint against the religious authorities for failing in their role as shepherds of Israel who should seek for the lost. Second, at some level Jesus saw himself as taking up the task described in Ezekiel 34 and other texts which focus on a deliverer from God who will shepherd the people as God intends (on which see below, p. 107).
...
At the same time, images selected for stories are not chosen at random; they are specifically chosen to set off resonances, and reference to a shepherd and sheep would bring to mind the OT use of these images for God, leaders, and hope for God’s people. Nothing supports the suggestion that reference is to someone seeking the kingdom. 66 The logic of the parable is this: If, as surely you would agree, a shepherd will go after a lost sheep and rejoice when he finds it, how much more will God search for a lost/ strayed person and rejoice when he recovers that person? Both Evangelists point to God as the analogue of the shepherd in the way they frame the parable, 67 which fits with the OT imagery.
....
The more troublesome part of the discussion of repentance is the reference in Luke 15: 7 to the ninety-nine righteous who do not need repentance. Since theologically it is assumed that no such people exist and since the Gospels imply that Pharisees do need to repent, this statement is often taken as irony, exaggeration, or sarcasm. 75 I do not think that this is the solution to the text. Judaism did ascribe sinlessness to a very few people, 76 but “righteous” does not mean “sinless.” It merely refers to those in good standing before God. Repentance is so central to Jewish thinking that it is hard to imagine Jews thinking of themselves, of the majority of the people, or even of ninety-nine specific people as not needing repentance. Ideas parallel to not needing repentance appear in Luke 5: 31-32 (the sick, not the well, need a doctor; Jesus did not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance) and in 15: 29 (the elder son’s claim not to have broken a command is left unchallenged).
...
In other words, the parable teaches virtually nothing about the nature of repentance, but does emphasize how much God values repentance.
6. What does the parable teach?
The primary function of this parable for Jesus was a defense of his deliberate association with and eating with people known to be sinners. 82 By his reception and eating with such people he demonstrated the presence of the kingdom and the forgiveness available to all. Indirectly this is a kingdom parable, 83 for with this parable Jesus asserts that the promised activity of God to shepherd his own people was taking place. Further, with the parable he showed those complaining about his actions that their attitude did not match the character and desires of God, and in effect, invites them to join in the kingdom celebration of the forgiveness being dispensed.
Luke wants his readers to understand Jesus’ gospel and to adopt the same attitude. Implicitly there may also be the charge that the religious leaders were not doing their job in seeking the lost. Matthew — regardless of whether Jesus or Matthew applied the parable to disciples — wants his readers to apply the character and desires of God to their relations in the community, especially to those who appear to be marginal. If the nimshalim are redactional, still they have it correct, merely making explicit that the controlling factor is the character of God. However, this is not an abstract theological discussion; the parable portrays the character of God as it is specifically revealed in the ministry of Jesus.
What is revealed about the character of God is the value he places on even the least deserving and the care he extends to such people. God is not passive, waiting for people to approach him after they get their lives in order. He is the seeking God who takes the initiative to bring people back, regardless of how “lost” they are.
C. G. Montefiore, a Jewish NT scholar, said that this focus on God’s direct seeking of sinners was a new element with Jesus, something not in the OT or rabbinic teaching. 84 This is at least an exaggeration, for certainly the OT knows that the initiative for forgiveness always lies with God. Whether new or not, the God revealed by Jesus is a caring God who values even those without value and seeks them.85 If the kingdom comes with limitless grace and limitless demand, this parable emphasizes the limitless grace. Unquestionably, God will seek the lost and restore them.
Seeking and joy are the twin pillars of the parable, and God’s seeking does not come with conditions attached. 86 The joy reflects both the attitude of God at recovering the lost and the celebration of the kingdom with its good news that God’s promised redemption has begun. The joy is communal, and Jesus’ hearers should join the celebration. 87
Snodgrass, Klyne R.. Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus (snipits from p. 96 -109). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. Kindle Edition.