Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Abomination of Desolation in 70AD

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,038.00
Goal
$1,038.00
26 "And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself;

And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined.

...Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; 33 AD

... And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. 70 AD

It is clear from verse 26 that the 70th week, and the Abomination of Desolation is in no way associated with the Messiah, nor the events of 70 AD.


27 He will make a firm covenant with many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and offering. And the abomination of desolation will be on a wing of the temple until the decreed destruction is poured out on the desolator."

We see the 70 th week begin some time after the events of 70 AD as the frame work of this prophetic word is laid out.


JLB

Dan.9:24 "Seventy weeks (490 years) are determined...."

Daniels prophecy covers a period of 490 years, no more, no less.
The futurist inserts a "gap" of nearly 2000 years and counting......why????
457bc-34ad=490 years!

There is no reason whatsoever to insert a 2000 year "gap"!
Since 70ad far exceeds the 490 year fulfillment of Daniels prophecy, we must face the fact that the destruction of the temple in 70ad (verse 26) occurred after the fulfillment of the 70th week!

Furthermore, by insisting that the 70 weeks is not yet fulfilled, the futurist denies the redemptive blessings of the finished work of the cross (v24)......having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof!

Fact:
Jesus prophesies the destruction of Jerusalem (the buildings) (Mark.13:2)
His disciples ask him when this will happen and what sign will be given to indicate it will happen (verse 4)
Jesus begins to answer HIS DISCIPLES ("Jesus answering them") (verse 5)
Jesus tells his disciples that they would see the AOD ("when you shall see the AOD) (verse 14)
Jesus tells his disciples that their generation ("this generation") would not die until these things were done (came to pass).

The AOD was (the "sign") and "this generation" (40 years) was the "when" (the time)!

The futurist does not disagree with me, he disagrees with the Lord!

Blessings, Hope of glory.



The armies surrounding Jerusalem, has nothing to do with the events of 70 AD.

There is no language to tie the events of 70 AD to in Luke 21.

The language "destroy the city and sanctuary" is nt seen in the Olivet Discourse.

Zechariah 14 show BOTH the armies and the return of The Lord with the saints, as well as the signs in the heavens.

Zechariah 14 is clearly not about the Roman armies.

1 Behold, the day of the Lord is coming, And your spoil will be divided in your midst. 2 For I will gather all the nations to battle against Jerusalem; The city shall be taken, The houses rifled, And the women ravished. Half of the city shall go into captivity, But the remnant of the people shall not be cut off from the city. 3 Then the Lord will go forth And fight against those nations, As He fights in the day of battle. 4 And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, Which faces Jerusalem on the east. And the Mount of Olives shall be split in two, From east to west, Making a very large valley; Half of the mountain shall move toward the north And half of it toward the south. 5 Then you shall flee through My mountain valley, For the mountain valley shall reach to Azal. Yes, you shall flee As you fled from the earthquake In the days of Uzziah king of Judah. Thus the Lord my God will come, And all the saints with You. 6 It shall come to pass in that day That there will be no light; The lights will diminish.

There was no Return of The Lord in 70 AD!

Preterism has built a doctrine from misunderstanding the scriptures.


JLB
 
Armies most certainly did surround Jerusalem in 70AD, so Luke 21:20 is definitely linked in this respect to the events of 70AD.
 
Half of the mountain shall move toward the north And half of it toward the south.


Just a thought, not necessarily related to this scripture. But thinking to two mountains. That those who are of the Mosaic Law (Jews) without Christ are standing on Mt. Sinai. Those that have Christ (Jew and Gentile) are standing on Mt Zion.
 
I don't see Zechariah 14, as referring to 70 AD.

If so, that would have to be explained to me.

The reason being that the Lord fights against the nations and that's not what I see in 70 AD.
 
I don't see Zechariah 14, as referring to 70 AD.

If so, that would have to be explained to me.

The reason being that the Lord fights against the nations and that's not what I see in 70 AD.

Excellent observation!

Zechariah contains language of both Jerusalem being surrounded by armies and the return of The Lord.

Zechariah 14 is about the end of the age, not the events of 70 AD!


JLB
 
Armies most certainly did surround Jerusalem in 70AD, so Luke 21:20 is definitely linked in this respect to the events of 70AD.

Amen!

Hyper-futurism must deny simple facts to maintain it's doctrine.

Luke 21:5-6 "....And as some spake of the TEMPLE....the days will come on the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down"
Verse 20 "And when you shall see JERUSALEM surrounded by armies then know that the desolation thereof is nigh"
Verse 332 "...this generation shall not pass away till all be fulfilled"

Both the temple and Jerusalem's desolation (destruction, ruin, pulling down) are mentioned in Luke 21. Jesus said his contemporary generation ("this generation") would witness these things before they died (v32)

Historically, Jerusalem and the temple were both destroyed (made desolate) in 70ad.

It is most clear that Luke 21:20 and well as verses 5-6 are linked to and refer to the events of 70ad (Jerusalems destruction). (The futurist ignores the fact of WHO Jesus' listeners were......"you shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies....". Jesus tells his FIRST CENTURY LISTENERS that THEY would see this!!!)

Fact: Luke 21:20 refers to Jerusalems destruction in 70ad
However, the futurist believes verse 27 speaks of Jesus' future return..."and they shall see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory"
Fact: the phrase "this generation" refers to one (a single) generation

Question, which the futurist will continue to stumble over:
How can a single generation (this generation) see both Jerusalems destruction (70ad) and Jesus' future return?

The best the futurist can do is to say "verse 20 doesn't refer to Jerusalrms destruction in 70ad". By this they maintain their doctrine yet deny history and the clear language of the text.

Hope of glory
 
Excellent observation!

Zechariah contains language of both Jerusalem being surrounded by armies and the return of The Lord.

Zechariah 14 is about the end of the age, not the events of 70 AD!

I have to agree, I still have been waiting and waiting on that scripture for 70ad armies and There does not seem to be any. If Rev was written before 70ad then I doubt it's even in there. As for Temples being overrun. Going through the OT it does not seem nothing new for Jerusalem to loose a temple here or there. In fact they got their butts handed to them on a regular basis for disobedience. Beat down and God restores them back, beat down again then God restores them back.

Which is why I question this Temple in Luke would even be worth mentioning getting (Supposedly) Destroyed in 70ad. Who would really care? It's connected to some very significant events such as all the signs of the 6th seal being released which would have been recorded in History somewhere. The stars vanishing seems like a big deal to me at least.

What really bothers me is that we have to take the stars and not make them really stars, even though we have many exact accounts in the OT. The sun is not really the sun and the moon is not really the moon. A definite event that would have been recorded somewhere.

What we do is make them something else to fit a Doctrine. You don't believe in Healing then you just say that "By His stripes we are healed." Is ummm. Spiritual Healing, nothing to be proven or seen, just believe it.


Hyper-futurism must deny simple facts to maintain it's doctrine.

Then we have this interesting statement. While not trying to come off as a complete nut case like those (Hyper-Futurism's) out there, we are to accept the Watered down version of it, even though we have to accept a very major event as hyperbole or symbolic, like where the heck the moon, stars and sun go? We don't want to come off as a fanatic so no way to those Hyper types, but seriously........ I can't compare the sun, moon and stars to anything reasonable, among other things. Call the stars angels? then all the angels disappearing would be in some history text right? Oh, you can't see angels so covered once again.

It's like Calvinism. There is hyper Calvinist and Calvinist. No matter how little Vodka you pour into my water though I can still taste it. Jesus said it another way, a little something does something to something but it's all bad.

Mike.
 
Question, which the futurist will continue to stumble over:
How can a single generation (this generation) see both Jerusalems destruction (70ad) and Jesus' future return?

Answer: Zechariah 14 has both the surrounding of Jerusalem and the return of The Lord Jesus!

Simple.

Luke 21:20 is a reference to this prophecy in Zechariah.


JLB
 
Question, which the futurist will continue to stumble over:
How can a single generation (this generation) see both Jerusalems destruction (70ad) and Jesus' future return?

Answer: Zechariah 14 has both the surrounding of Jerusalem and the return of The Lord Jesus!

Simple.

Luke 21:20 is a reference to this prophecy in Zechariah.


JLB

Can't agree with you on this. Luke 21, is the same scene as in Matthew 24. In Matthew 23, Jesus makes it quite clear that the Lord is not going to help them fight off enemies. "Your temple will be left to you, desolate." (para).
 
Question, which the futurist will continue to stumble over:
How can a single generation (this generation) see both Jerusalems destruction (70ad) and Jesus' future return?

Answer: Zechariah 14 has both the surrounding of Jerusalem and the return of The Lord Jesus!

Simple.

Luke 21:20 is a reference to this prophecy in Zechariah.


JLB

Can't agree with you on this. Luke 21, is the same scene as in Matthew 24. In Matthew 23, Jesus makes it quite clear that the Lord is not going to help them fight off enemies. "Your temple will be left to you, desolate." (para).


I don't remember Jesus paraphrasing scripture, so that it fit someone's doctrine.

JLB
 
There aint no Scriptures on WWI , WWII so I guess they didn't happen? The USA is not real because there are no Scriptures? IMO Jesus Himself, give the prophesy and some folks deny it to be so. I can't help but see the end of the Jewish Temple life as an important time. The Grace and Mercy of our Lord was shown to the faithful ( of the OT way of worship) to that last generation... The beginning of the end , in the human sense, was the birth of Jesus. He grew and began His earthly ministry. Then we have His Cross...Everything in the OT looks to His Sacrifice. We first see it in Geneses . I believe the old time saying was, the Red Thread that weaves through scripture.....

In reading the OT we see God doing a lot of stuff by generations why should this be different?
 
There aint no Scriptures on WWI , WWII so I guess they didn't happen? The USA is not real because there are no Scriptures? IMO Jesus Himself, give the prophesy and some folks deny it to be so. I can't help but see the end of the Jewish Temple life as an important time. The Grace and Mercy of our Lord was shown to the faithful ( of the OT way of worship) to that last generation... The beginning of the end , in the human sense, was the birth of Jesus. He grew and began His earthly ministry. Then we have His Cross...Everything in the OT looks to His Sacrifice. We first see it in Geneses . I believe the old time saying was, the Red Thread that weaves through scripture.....

In reading the OT we see God doing a lot of stuff by generations why should this be different?


I don't see America, china, the ussr. in the book of revalation
 
[MENTION=21030]Jason[/MENTION] you are a student of the OT. Here is a question.... Was there a time when God did something as big as destroying the Temple and did not warn the Israelites ?
 
I don't recall any. he told isiah to tell Hezekiah that it would come. Hezekiah was dead long before Josiah and Josiah was dead and 15 years later after his death the destruction came. isiah also sees the man whom would restore isreal to the land . cyrus. if god wanted us to know the end of the world and final jugdgment he would have told the world.when noah preached the flood there wasn't any signs, just that a flood would come.
 
I don't remember Jesus paraphrasing scripture, so that it fit someone's doctrine.

My name is Mike, and I approve of this statement.

Mike.[/QUOTE"] I said, In Matthew 23, Jesus makes it quite clear that the Lord is not going to help them fight off enemies. "Your temple will be left to you, desolate." (para)."

Matthew 23:38
Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Sorry, He sound pretty upset to me. "Vipers!". So I don't think He was helping them to fight off the nations, in this scripture of destruction.
Matt 23
35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.



So Mike, my paraphrase was not the far from being word for word AND the reason I gave from using that scripture to begin with I believe is pretty solid.
 
Excellent observation!

Zechariah contains language of both Jerusalem being surrounded by armies and the return of The Lord.

Zechariah 14 is about the end of the age, not the events of 70 AD!

I have to agree, I still have been waiting and waiting on that scripture for 70ad armies and There does not seem to be any. If Rev was written before 70ad then I doubt it's even in there. As for Temples being overrun. Going through the OT it
does not seem nothing new for Jerusalem to loose a temple here or there. In fact they got their butts handed to them on a regular basis for disobedience. Beat down and God restores them back, beat down again then God restores them back.

Which is why I question this Temple in Luke would even be worth mentioning getting (Supposedly) Destroyed in 70ad. Who would really care? It's connected to some very significant events such as all the signs of the 6th seal being released which would have been recorded in History somewhere. The stars vanishing seems like a big deal to me at least.

What really bothers me is that we have to take the stars and not make them really stars, even though we have many exact accounts in the OT. The sun is not really the sun and the moon is not really the moon. A definite event that would have been recorded somewhere.

What we do is make them something else to fit a Doctrine. You don't believe in Healing then you just say that "By His stripes we are healed." Is ummm. Spiritual Healing, nothing to be proven or seen, just believe it.

Hyper-futurism must deny simple facts to maintain it's doctrine.

Then we have this interesting statement. While not trying to come off as a complete nut case like those (Hyper-Futurism's) out there, we are to accept the Watered down version of it, even though we have to accept a very major event as
hyperbole or symbolic, like where the heck the moon, stars and sun go? We don't want to come off as a fanatic so no way to those Hyper types, but seriously........ I can't compare the sun, moon and stars to anything reasonable, among other things. Call the stars angels? then all the angels disappearing would be in some history text right? Oh, you can't see angels so covered once again.

It's like Calvinism. There is hyper Calvinist and Calvinist. No matter how little Vodka you pour into my water though I can still taste it. Jesus said it another way, a little something does something to something but it's all bad.

Mike.

Brother Mike

See it's as I said "The best the futurist can do is to say "verse 20 doesn't refer to Jerusalrms destruction in 70ad". By this they maintain their doctrine yet deny history and the clear language of the text."

This is what futurism has to say: "Luke 21:20 is a reference to this prophecy in Zechariah. "

Here are some facts:
Jesus spoke Luke 21 in approx. 30ad, and therefore his listening audience was a first century generation people.
When Jesus said "when YOU shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies..." (verse20), he was still speaking TO the first century generation.
The FACT is: Jesus told his first century generation that THEY would SEE JERUSALEM COMPASSED WITH ARMIES!
When Jesus said "THIS GENERATION shall not pass until all be fulfilled" he was speaking TO his first century contemporary generation!
The fact is: Jesus told his first century contemporary generation that Jerusalem would be surrounded and destroyed before they died (passed away)!

Question Mike:
Was Jesus speaking to his first century generation (were they his listening audience) in Luke 21....Yes or No?
When Jesus said "when YOU shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies..." was he still speaking TO his contemporary first century generation....Yes or No?
According to the simple reading of the text, did Jesus tell his first century contemporary generation that THEY would see Jerusalem surrounded with armies....Yes or No?

Brother Mike, please answer these questions honestly.

When you have done so please answer the following also:

How can a single generation (this generation) see both Jerusalems destruction (v20-a reference to 70ad) and Jesus' future return?

Thank you for your honesty and sincerity.

Hope of glory
 
There aint no Scriptures on WWI , WWII so I guess they didn't happen? The USA is not real because there are no Scriptures? IMO Jesus Himself, give the prophesy and some folks deny it to be so.

I fully understand what your saying some say that prophecy was fulfilled in (1946?) Israel became a Nation. I have a big issue though when you have to spiritualize the event of the 6th seal, and 7th following with the sun, moon, stars and why would anyone care if Israel lost yet another Temple for disobedience? Why would the Holy Spirit every record those events out of the volumes Jesus had talked about? Certainly they would have been remembered since Rev was written just before 70ad some say. They did not need to be eternally recorded if it was just for "That" generation.

So it's more than just a History lesson I am having issues with here.

Mike.
 
I see the generation of Jesus as a big deal...Something God planed on for about 4000 years..... Generation of Jesus, meaning around 4BC to the end to the ( what I will call temple age) 70 AD the total destruction of the temple way of life....

I will back out of this discussion or I will just keep repeating myself........ Keep the discussion friendly guys Thanks reba
 
Back
Top