[_ Old Earth _] For Christians only: Do you accept a 6 day creation 6,000 YA

[reznwerks]

believed

Reznwerks wrote:

So you want to use a lot of ifs to confirm you belief in a 6000 year earth. The fact that something might have happened or that something might have happened that we don't understand its significance or that somehow C14 dating is so way out of whack and no one knows it but you must somehow be confirmation that God exists and your 6000 year earth is valid? LOL

Do you realize how much of your TOE is dependant on the dating methods being believed? :roll:

Not believed but accepted. Accepted because repeated testing confirms the method is valid and accurate for thousands of years. If you don't want to accept reality that is your business.

 

[unred typo]

Reznwerks wrote:

Not believed but accepted. Accepted because repeated testing confirms the method is valid and accurate for thousands of years. If you don't want to accept reality that is your business.

The reality is it can’t be proven and it isn’t reliable and just because it is widely adored and extolled by evolutionists, evolutionists accept it and promote it and have conned the rest of the gullible to accept it. I can wait. It will be laughable one day like everything else that has gone up against God and the truth of scriptures.

Actually, we're off topic and messing up this thread. :

 

[reznwerks]

reliable

The reality is it can’t be proven and it isn’t reliable and just because it is widely adored and extolled by evolutionists, evolutionists accept it and promote it and have conned the rest of the gullible to accept it. I can wait. It will be laughable one day like everything else that has gone up against God and the truth of scriptures.

:

Can you show where God is reliable and can be proven? If not can those that believe be considered conned and gullible as well. Christianity makes promises from which no one can get a refund if not true. There is no one to make sure the promises and claims are real. Prayer can be answered three ways. yes no or not now but somehow whatever happens it is the answer to the prayer. Yet you make assertions that those who accept what they see and is proven are somehow gullible by accepting hard facts and hard evidence. How do you do that? I know, with faith which is the evidence of things not seen.

 

[unred typo]

Reznwerks wrote:

Can you show where God is reliable and can be proven? If not can those that believe be considered conned and gullible as well. Christianity makes promises from which no one can get a refund if not true. There is no one to make sure the promises and claims are real. Prayer can be answered three ways. yes no or not now but somehow whatever happens it is the answer to the prayer. Yet you make assertions that those who accept what they see and is proven are somehow gullible by accepting hard facts and hard evidence. How do you do that? I know, with faith which is the evidence of things not seen.

Don’t you mean hardly facts and hardly evidence? The hard facts are written in stone and attest to the finger of a ingenious creator who buried the previous world under water, repopulated the present one with an arkful of survivors and keeps all of nature in such perfect intricate balance that both evolutionists and creationist can only marvel. There is none so blind as he who refuses to see.


Reznwerks wrote:

Christianity makes promises from which no one can get a refund if not true.

Just love one another and no one gets hurt. :

 

[reznwerks]

facts

Reznwerks wrote:

Can you show where God is reliable and can be proven? If not can those that believe be considered conned and gullible as well. Christianity makes promises from which no one can get a refund if not true. There is no one to make sure the promises and claims are real. Prayer can be answered three ways. yes no or not now but somehow whatever happens it is the answer to the prayer. Yet you make assertions that those who accept what they see and is proven are somehow gullible by accepting hard facts and hard evidence. How do you do that? I know, with faith which is the evidence of things not seen.

Don’t you mean hardly facts and hardly evidence? The hard facts are written in stone and attest to the finger of a ingenious creator who buried the previous world under water, repopulated the present one with an arkful of survivors and keeps all of nature in such perfect intricate balance that both evolutionists and creationist can only marvel. There is none so blind as he who refuses to see.
The facts you attest to do not exist. If they were facts it would be obvious.


Reznwerks wrote:[quote:2765d] Christianity makes promises from which no one can get a refund if not true.

Just love one another and no one gets hurt. :
You don't need Christianity for that nor a God and other religions teach the same thing.[/quote:2765d]

 

[unred typo]

Reznwerks wrote:

The facts you attest to do not exist. If they were facts it would be obvious.

Not to you.
Reznwerks wrote:

You don't need Christianity for that nor a God and other religions teach the same thing.

You probably won’t need God until you find yourself looking down at your own cold, lifeless body and are being pulled off to face your uncertain future.

 

[reznwerks]

facts

Reznwerks wrote:

The facts you attest to do not exist. If they were facts it would be obvious.

Not to you.
I accept facts the way most people do. I either observe first hand or I look at testamony from others. Then I look at the credibility of those doing the testifying and if needed the numbers of those doing the testifying. Then I might look at what is being testified too. If it is too outlandish to still be believable then I will hold that testimony until I witnessed it myself. I would do the same with claims made in other subject areas.
Reznwerks wrote:[quote:fa656] You don't need Christianity for that nor a God and other religions teach the same thing.

You probably won’t need God until you find yourself looking down at your own cold, lifeless body and are being pulled off to face your uncertain future.
I have said many times that if there is a hereafter it is available to one and all alike. I am not going to heaven and no one else is either for believing what the conscious mind knows is impossible to occur.Being skeptical is not a sin and is not going to condemn anyone.

[/quote:fa656]

 

[unred typo]

Reznwerks wrote:

I accept facts the way most people do. I either observe first hand or I look at testamony from others. Then I look at the credibility of those doing the testifying and if needed the numbers of those doing the testifying. Then I might look at what is being testified too. If it is too outlandish to still be believable then I will hold that testimony until I witnessed it myself. I would do the same with claims made in other subject areas.

That sounds like a good way to go about it.

Reznwerks wrote:

I have said many times that if there is a hereafter it is available to one and all alike. I am not going to heaven and no one else is either for believing what the conscious mind knows is impossible to occur.Being skeptical is not a sin and is not going to condemn anyone.

Being saved from hell is a gift that wasn’t earned or deserved but is offered by his Son. Believing the message that God sent will help you stay within the guidelines he gave to qualify for eternal life. If you forgive others, you will be forgiven by God. Pretty simple actually. Maybe some of what is taught in Hinduism is right. If you put no effort into your assignment on earth but do no harm to others, you will be rewarded with eternal life as a happy clam or slug.

 

[reznwerks]

hell

Reznwerks wrote:

I accept facts the way most people do. I either observe first hand or I look at testamony from others. Then I look at the credibility of those doing the testifying and if needed the numbers of those doing the testifying. Then I might look at what is being testified too. If it is too outlandish to still be believable then I will hold that testimony until I witnessed it myself. I would do the same with claims made in other subject areas.

That sounds like a good way to go about it.

Reznwerks wrote:[quote:15a5f] I have said many times that if there is a hereafter it is available to one and all alike. I am not going to heaven and no one else is either for believing what the conscious mind knows is impossible to occur.Being skeptical is not a sin and is not going to condemn anyone.

Being saved from hell is a gift that wasn’t earned or deserved but is offered by his Son. Believing the message that God sent will help you stay within the guidelines he gave to qualify for eternal life. If you forgive others, you will be forgiven by God. Pretty simple actually. Maybe some of what is taught in Hinduism is right. If you put no effort into your assignment on earth but do no harm to others, you will be rewarded with eternal life as a happy clam or slug.
Hell doesn't exist except in the Christian religion and those it copied from. Eternal life doesn't exist except in the belief of the Christian religion. If I forgive others I also forgive myself and whether God forgives me the jury is still out as to his existance. Hinduism is another religion that has given much to Christianity but any claims of evidence for the hereafter are sorely lacking. Hinduism is also the OLDEST religion and if you like you can compare the similarities here.\
http://www.hindunet.org/alt_hindu/1994_2/msg00055.html


[/quote:15a5f]

 

[Heidi]

I guess you'll find out when you die, rezenwerks, whether there's a hell or not. If you think you know better than Christ about heaven & hell, then by all means, pass your wisdom along to others. But one day you will find out who was right; you or Christ. I can tell you one thing; I'm not bettin' on you. ;-) You will also be held accountable for the lives you affect in doing so, my friend. And that is a guarantee. ;-)