ThinkerMan said:But evolutuonsists maintain that evolution is based on survival of the fittest. So again, why haven't human beings bred a species as different from humans as humans are from the primates they supposedly came from? Some apes and some dogs are better than other apes & dogs, but that hasn't changed their species.
That's like me giving you one acorn and asking your to grow a thousand oak trees in a week. It doesn't mean you can't, it just means you can't do it right away.
You are ignoring the time factor. We have only been domesticating animals and plants for a little over 10,000 years.
Humans evolved over millions of years. We have been studying evolution for about 200. What you ask isn't reasonable, nor is it a claim of evolution.
[quote:8f3dd]It's still just a "what if". That's like me saying that humans will turn into goats someday because I say so. It's tantamount to saying that there is no proof but there might be someday.
Evolution, and I daresay any scientists, have anything to say about how things WILL evolve. Rather, they only look backwards to explain how things HAVE evolved. A major difference.
That is why domestication is such a messy business, with many failed attempts and it takes a great number of generations to even make a dent.
Again, evolution is, always has been, and always will be, a theory.
Bravo. You are correct. Of course you realize that "theory" is not a bad word, right?
And the theory came about only to say there is no God.
Opinion
If all people believed that God created humans in his image and animals separately, there would be no theory of evolution.
Tell that to all the Christians on this forum who accept the theory.
But as usual, man thinks he knows better than God so he tries to decide how we all got here.
Not decide, but determine.
The only problem is the fallibility of man always shows up when he disagrees with God.
Then you are fallible as well.
The evolution theory brings up more questions than answers because the "answers" cannot be found in reality, only in the imagination.
There are mountains of real evidence. I could link thousands of pages if you choose to read them and could comprehend the science, math and reason behind them.
What can be found in reality and always has been in reality is that each animal reproduces his own kind.
There are many instances of new species being created over the course of multiple generations. You choose to ignore them because the are plants and little bugs. Not too "sexy", as they say.
Large mammals reproduce much too slow for us to readily witness speciation, particularly since we have only been looking for it for a few hundred years. As I said with the acorns, you need many generations and time. Plants and bugs are quick, chimpanzees and humans are slow.
But apparently you want new mammal species as proof. Unless you are Methusaleh, you ain't getting it.
There is no superhuman race and there are no apes or primates that breed human beings.
Not sure where you got superhuman.
I have an excellent example of primates breeding humans. My parents are primates. They had me, also a primate and a human being.[/quote:8f3dd]
So what you're saying, is that there is no proof for evolution but there will be. Is that correct? And in 5, 000 years from now (provided humans live that long), and no evidence of superior species develop, you'll still be saying; "Give it time?" Sorry, but again, the truth can only be found in reality, not in the imagination. By your reasoning anything can be proven because it will be proven tomorrow. And you say you need evidence for your beliefs? :o That sure hasn't been shown to be true.
Superior species comes from the survival of the fittest theory. According to evolutionists we develpoed from lower primates. So again, if species evolve, then why haven't humans produced species as superior to us as we are to lower primates?
So you're saying that humans come from humans. Is that correct? if so, I'll buy that. Reality backs that up.