Because it's the same exact thing when you put your hands together to clap. It makes a noise afterwards. I'm not saying that's how it happened I'm just saying it's a possibility.
Christian Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
-
Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
Science Vs. Christianity
- Thread starter HeIsRisen2018
- Start date
Because it's the same exact thing when you put your hands together to clap. It makes a noise afterwards. I'm not saying that's how it happened I'm just saying it's a possibility.
Except God says that he spoke and it was. Scientists are seeking an explanation that does not involve God.
You know what I give up. It looks like some people are going to still argue with me no matter what I say. 
So be it then. It isn't worth arguing about it. Everybody is free to believe whatever they want to believe. However, remember, just because something isn't written about in the Bible doesn't mean it didn't happen. 
So be it then. It isn't worth arguing about it. Everybody is free to believe whatever they want to believe. However, remember, just because something isn't written about in the Bible doesn't mean it didn't happen. 
I don't know if this is necessarily true. All science can do it provide an explanation of the world and/or universe around us based on what we have learned thus far or based on projected theories, which are deduced from the knowledge we've gained as a species thus far.
Even the title of this thread is deceiving. Why is it Science vs Christianity? They don't have to be at odds. One is man's explanation using man's understanding and the other is God's explanation using God's understanding. I don't see a conflict. I see a difference due to our limited understanding but that is all.
Also here's just something else to think about,. if the Bible had the answer to all of life's questions it would be a LOT thicker. Just saying.
I don't recall ever making the claim they cannot coexist.
What we have to be careful about is confusing scientific theory with scientific fact. They are not the same. A theory by definition is only an educated guess derived from repeated testing and evaluation and based only on evidence, conditions, and circumstances at the time. In other words, theories are accepted explanations that have not yet been proven to be fact.
The Theory of Evolution is one example. It is called a theory because the scientific community generally accepts it as a viable explanation of a phenomena that has been presented with evidence but as yet has never been proven as fact.
On a similar topic, we also must be careful not to confuse evolution with natural selection. These too are two different things.
In a nutshell, natural selection is when minor mutations develop and is passed along to offspring. It is called natural selection because the minor mutation perhaps gave the mutant a little advantage over others and so was able to mature and procreate to pass along the mutation.
An example might be the color of fur where the new color offers the animal a little better concealment than others of its kind.
In humans, ever notice that those who historically live near the equator are usually darker skinned, thinner, taller, and leaner than those that live further north? It's an adaptation that makes them better suited for the climate. That's an example of natural selection.
No, what you're describing is man manipulating the process. The color adaptation comes naturally and we manipulate the process and interfere with the progression by selective breeding.
And now, we are delving in deeper with gene splicing. We are playing god.
I wouldn't say probable. I'd say plausible. That's what a theory is.
Breeders? No. Gene splicing? Yes.
So, now what you're basically saying is that you do not believe in the theory of evolution.