Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

[__ Science __ ] The science (knowledge) of the Bible, what kind of strange is this?

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,038.00
Goal
$1,038.00

Sparkey

Retired
Member
Thought bubble: . o O ((It's been too long since I've posted but I was wondering . . .))

So, I remember reading about when Jacob requested only the specked and spotted sheep and goats from all Laban’s flocks that he tended, to make flocks of his own. It is unclear how or why it worked, but Jacob put striped branches in front of the flocks when they mated, and it resulted in specked and spotted offspring that he could claim for himself. Jacob did this only with the strong animals so that his flocks grew strong while Laban had weak flocks (Genesis 30:31–43 especially Gen 30:41) .

We know that Jacob’s name is translated as 'he deceives' or 'he cheats' (grabber?) (Genesis 25:26). This seems more like spiritual cunning than deception, except, perhaps in Laban's view. Here we have a story that defies explanation. What kind of "science" might be used to explain Jacob's plans for increase? What scientific explanation could there be for striped branches begetting speckled and spotted lambs, or if not 'begetting' at least being a causative agent in the process???

God blessed him, is my guess. But then, I wonder about these things too. Yes, and obviously, it was the blessing of God. It could be nothing else. But what of the secret / unseen things? Those things unobserved and hence inexplicable to the Scientific Method?

Here's the passage that I've been pondering: Genesis 30:31–43 English Standard Version

Maybe it was "aliens"? (he suggests, tongue-in-cheek). What was the mechanism of that heredity? How was the passing on of physical characteristics genetically from one generation to another accomplished that time? God's hand? Yes. Certainly. That's a simple (true enough) explanation. It seems though that there may be more going on than that. My mind goes toward 'extra-terrestrial' beings but not 'aliens'.

"What are Your thoughts, Father?" May I search them out on this? Could it be that Jacob was directing angels? And now a thought of Jacob's ladder. Earlier in Jacob's journey he had a dream of a ladder to heaven (with God at the top) and angels ascending and descending. This same imagery is found in Jesus' words to Nathanael in John 1:51.

I trust that I'm on-topic still as I take another leap into the N.T. for another peak into the "how?" of it all: Matthew 8:9: "For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, 'Go,' and he goes; and that one, 'Come,' and he comes. I say to my servant, 'Do this,' and he does it."

Before you reply, "Hold on there, brother! Let's not lose the focus. To God be the glory!"

Let me reply, "Amen, to that!" And add, Science (from the Latin word scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions.

As Shakespeare once penned,
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy. - Hamlet

Perhaps there is more than one such something that nature and/or Science fails to see.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps there is more than one such something that nature and/or Science fails to see.
The mystery of Dark Energy and Dark Matter comes to mind. We simply love to label and then dismiss things, don't we? L&D --> "Oh! That would be the inexplicable [Insert Label <Here>]. Certainly we can dismiss that until such time as we might be able to 'scientia' (build and organize knowledge) this heretofore unknown [repeat Label <Here>]." Naturally, the lofty "Scientific Method" takes time, does it not?

We won't forget to use big words comprised of different segments of ancient, mostly forgotten, languages. Oh, and an air of superiority is sure to help. We've been taught how to do this and have practiced it already. It's called education and our society has seen fit to force it upon our children since about the time of the Great Depression. Compulsory public education started about 100 years ago in the early 1920's with the Smith-Towner bill when politicians wondered what to do with the children who left their hopes to wander about the cities hoping to find work and send their dimes (literally dimes) back home. Take a Google at how the word "teen" came into usage, if you like. Yeah, Big Government to the rescue.
______________________________________________

You might not knowege it now, but I actually do like science. Just not the superb anthropomorphic type as in, "Science would disagree," or some such. /Harrumph!

______________________________________________
It's a 10 year old article published right after the official "Year of Astrology, 2009" --oops, did I say that? I meant, "Year of Astronomy, 2009":

Dark Energy and Dark Matter Might Not Exist, Scientists Allege
 
Last edited:
Back
Top