[__ Science __ ] The Scientific argument against Abortion

[Who Me]

Many are unsure about abortion and are mislead by the prochoice propogander.
If you are unsure or are sure but want the science on your side then this site and its link is for you.
https://winteryknight.com/2019/01/2...ts-debate-is-backed-by-scientific-evidence-2/
Has an argument from the facts that life does begin at fertilisation.If the argument in the link arn't enough there is another link there I'll post it:- https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/11/20449/
to a site that discusses the science of fertilisation.
'The genetically distinct part is key – this unborn child is has a different DNA signature (a human signature) than either the mother or the father. Nothing will be added or taken away from this new signature as the unborn child grows. It never changes. '

 

[Truthfrees]

Many are unsure about abortion and are mislead by the prochoice propogander.
If you are unsure or are sure but want the science on your side then this site and its link is for you.
https://winteryknight.com/2019/01/2...ts-debate-is-backed-by-scientific-evidence-2/
Has an argument from the facts that life does begin at fertilisation.If the argument in the link arn't enough there is another link there I'll post it:- https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/11/20449/
to a site that discusses the science of fertilisation.
'The genetically distinct part is key – this unborn child is has a different DNA signature (a human signature) than either the mother or the father. Nothing will be added or taken away from this new signature as the unborn child grows. It never changes. '

amen - the truth has always been there - the pro-science pro-abortion people know this - it's just an inconvenient truth to them - thus the alternate "excised lump of tissue" narrative