[__ Science __ ] What If,...

[Who Me]

Makes sense.

Except Gods say that do did act, that creation was a deterministic action not random.

 

[Barbarian]

Sorry but there is no evidence of any creature evolving into another.
Every time I say this the only evidence I am offered is of a creature changing into the same form it already is. Birds remain birds, dogs stay dogs, fish stay as fish.

If the evidence is sufficient please show me it?

YEC Kurt Wise, although he prefers his own interpretation of scripture, admits:

Evidences for Darwin’s second expectation - of stratomorphic intermediate species - include such species as Baragwanathia27 (between rhyniophytes and lycopods), Pikaia28 (between echinoderms and chordates), Purgatorius29 (between the tree shrews and the primates), and Proconsul30 (between the non-hominoid primates and the hominoids). Darwin’s third expectation - of higher-taxon stratomorphic intermediates - has been confirmed by such examples as the mammal-like reptile groups31 between the reptiles and the mammals, and the phenacdontids32 between the horses and their presumed ancestors. Darwin’s fourth expectation - of stratomorphic series - has been confirmed by such examples as the early bird series,33 the tetrapod series,34,35 the whale series,36 the various mammal series of the Cenozoic37 (for example, the horse series, the camel series, the elephant series, the pig series, the titanothere series, etc.), the Cantius and Plesiadapus primate series,38 and the hominid series.39 Evidence for not just one but for all three of the species level and above types of stratomorphic intermediates expected by macroevolutionary theory is surely strong evidence for macroevolutionary theory. Creationists therefore need to accept this fact. It certainly CANNOT said that traditional creation theory expected (predicted) any of these fossil finds.
Kurt Wise, Toward a Creationist Understanding of Transitional Forms

https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j09_2/j09_2_216-222.pdf