Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
He's essentially telling you to drink a fifth of whiskey before driving a car, because sober drivers sometimes have an accident.
That's what it amounts to. Who would be foolish enough to choose a much greater risk to avoid a very unlikely risk. It's like telling you to drink a fifth of whiskey before driving a car, because sober drivers sometimes have an accident.What?
You have actually lost your mind.
It's quite true. Same reasoning. As you see, the threat of blood clots from COVID-19 infection is many times greater than the threat of blood clots in vaccinated people. It seems insane to try to avoid a hazard by choosing a course of action that increases the hazard.Why would you make up an absolute bald face lie?
That's what it amounts to. Who would be foolish enough to choose a much greater risk to avoid a very unlikely risk. It's like telling you to drink a fifth of whiskey before driving a car, because sober drivers sometimes have an accident.
It is saving millions. So far, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are safer than most other vaccines.The only risk is taking the "vaccine" that is killing millions
Or render them unable to have children. But the anti-choice crowd will not listen, my friend. The big question is what will happen in round 2. Will many again believe the lies and comply or wake up and refuse? Since those “vaccines” (not corona) neurological cases have exploded in our clinic. I’ve never seen so many new neurological maladies in such a short time.The only risk is taking the "vaccine" that is killing millions, just as it was designed to do.
Well yes and no.The only risk is taking the "vaccine" that is killing millions, just as it was designed to do.
(not corona)?Or render them unable to have children. But the anti-choice crowd will not listen, my friend. The big question is what will happen in round 2. Will many again believe the lies and comply or wake up and refuse? Since those “vaccines” (not corona) neurological cases have exploded in our clinic. I’ve never seen so many new neurological maladies in such a short time.
No, the increase in neurological problems of varying diagnosis is noticeable since the jabs. This was not at all true during the first year of Covid but only once those “jabs” were introduced. The jabs give the body the Dna or RNA to make spike whereby no time limit has been measured. And this occurs wherever blood vessels go (everywhere). This is NOT true of covid which mainly stays upper respiratory with or without jabs.Well yes and no.
There are IMHO two great risks.
Without the vaccine people still have adverse effects. Spike protein does exist before the vaccinations.
With vaccine. People have Covid and the synthetic lipids that seem to cause more / easier spike protein penetration into the cells.
Beyond those observations my speculation runs wild.
(not corona)?
Are you saying what I said?
eddif
Or render them unable to have children. But the anti-choice crowd will not listen, my friend. The big question is what will happen in round 2. Will many again believe the lies and comply or wake up and refuse? Since those “vaccines” (not corona) neurological cases have exploded in our clinic. I’ve never seen so many new neurological maladies in such a short time.
You have zero proof that the vaccine was designed to kill people. It was dessigned to make covid 19 less deadly. Also millions have not died from the vaccine. Millions have died since the vaccine was released however there is nothing linking that to the vaccine.The only risk is taking the "vaccine" that is killing millions, just as it was designed to do.
How many of those people had sever symptoms or died? Prople can still get an infection with a vaccine and boosters, it mKes it so your body can handle it if you do.No, the increase in neurological problems of varying diagnosis is noticeable since the jabs. This was not at all true during the first year of Covid but only once those “jabs” were introduced. The jabs give the body the Dna or RNA to make spike whereby no time limit has been measured. And this occurs wherever blood vessels go (everywhere). This is NOT true of covid which mainly stays upper respiratory with or without jabs.
What is more, this week I had to read and enter patient data into our research project data base and I can’t tell you how many had 3 + jabs and then got Covid. The jabs provide nothing but danger.
Exactly. My wife was higher risk for blood clots from AZ but took it anyway because it was the first available. She was hesitant until she did some searching and found the risk of blood clots was significantly higher from COVID. Rather a no-brainer.The data are very clear. The threat of blood clots from COVID-19 infection is many times greater than the threat of blood clots in vaccinated people. It seems insane to try to avoid a hazard by choosing a course of action that increases the hazard.
The likelihood of developing TTS after J&J's COVID vaccine is 4 cases per one million doses, the CDC said. And, keep in mind, tens of millions of doses have been safely administered in the U.S.
Also important, one study determined that people were eight to 10 times more likely to develop blood clots in the brain from having COVID itself rather than from receiving either of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.
https://www.novanthealth.org/healthy-headlines/vaccines-and-blood-clots
What rational person would choose a much higher risk of blood clots?
And so far, no one has died of blood clots caused by vaccines, but plenty of people hospitalized with COVID infections have died from those clots.Exactly. My wife was higher risk for blood clots from AZ but took it anyway because it was the first available. She was hesitant until she did some searching and found the risk of blood clots was significantly higher from COVID. Rather a no-brainer.