Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Being a person of faith, I can choose to believe God in the Alexandrian text of the NT. Oz
  2. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    How you said it was unkind. I wasn't speaking about what you said but how! Oz
  3. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Alfred, I'm finding it impossible to have a rational conversation with you when you accept an ending of Mark 16 that includes drinking deadly poison and handling snakes. Are you endorsing those activities in churches today as gifts that continue? Oz
  4. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Alfred, I know the answer because I've done my research about the age of the Received Text. How do you know Wilbur Pickering's view was correct? So you live by "that/your conviction" and not by your researched conclusion! Oz
  5. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Alfred, The bigger issue in this thread is: Is Mark 16:9-20 in the Bible or has it been added at a later time than the originals? Oz
  6. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Alfred, How late in textual transmission did Erasmus gather the manuscripts for the Textus Receptus? Oz
  7. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    andy, That's an unkind way to speak to Alfred. It should not be allowed on a Christian forum. Oz
  8. OzSpen

    These Signs Will Follow Those Who Believe (Mark 16:17)

    Alfred, I don't understand the reason why you are raising Mark 16:9-20 when they are not in the earliest biblical texts. See: Circular Reasoning: Mark 16:9-20 Oz
  9. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    wondering, Harris's morality without God gave us Hitler's Nazis and 6 million slaughtered, Idi Amin, Pol Pot and their genocides. Could it be associated with the mass killings in USA? It's also giving us the killing fields of abortion when we abandon God's absolute values of life and death. I...
  10. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    wondering, I've been working on publication of my book for the last 2 years, How to Ruin Your Education and TV Viewing: Five Lessons from John Dominic Crossan (Wipf and Stock 2022). It's too heavy on methodology. I've had an article published in Online Opinion regarding the increase in "no...
  11. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    wondering, The curriculum is awaiting my push to find a publisher. I'll probably start with Scripture Union, which has a reputation for working in public schools. Most of the last 2 years has been spent on publishing How to Ruin Your Education and TV Viewing: Five Lessons from John Dominic...
  12. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    wondering, Father, Son and Holy Spirit are co-equal but they are not identical. Each is a separate Person in the Trinity with a different function. Oz
  13. OzSpen

    Trust in Truth

    Could you please explain what you understand is truth and how to find it? Oz
  14. OzSpen

    How to defend the trinity!

    English is spelled English and not english. Oz
  15. OzSpen

    How to defend the trinity!

    I am concerned with grammar and punctuation as they tell me your understanding of the importance of grammar. Now I know you pay no attention to grammar because you are in such a rush on various sites. May I suggest you concern yourself also with people and their needs. Oz
  16. OzSpen

    How to defend the trinity!

    keiw1, You can't even get your English grammar correct. "They said its impossible for Jesus...." should read, "They said it's impossible for Jesus...." Also, "its all they need to have truth" should read, "it's all they need to have truth." Please learn correct punctuation when you use an...
  17. OzSpen

    How to defend the trinity!

    keiw1, Your line of reasoning is incorrect according to the "bible" of Greek lexicons, Bauer, Arndt and Gingrich (University of Chicago Press / Zondervan 1957) pp 357-358 ff, where Ho Theos means "of divine beings generally", with reference to Christ, quite predominately of the true God without...
  18. OzSpen

    How to defend the trinity!

    Peter, For you to conclude this way, you did not take notice of the content of my 6-7 links in a post above. I provided the biblical evidence for the Trinity and discussed some of the difficulties. You seem to be resistant to listen to the biblical revelation. Oz
  19. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    Cooper, It's spelt Modalism and not Modulism. This heretical view has Father, Son and Holy Spirit operating as three different modes of God. "Modalism is the doctrine that the persons of the Trinity represent only three modes or aspects of the divine revelation, not distinct and coexisting...
  20. OzSpen

    The Truth About The Trinity Doctrine: The Answer to All Questions.

    Peterlag, That's a broad statement against the Trinity, with no supporting evidence to uphold your view. If you plan to refute the Trinity, please start with biblical evidence. You might like to use some of the evidence I've provided in my articles: I have written seven articles on the...
Back
Top