Endtimesdeut32
Member
Some say that they can see Preterist understandings in some scriptures but not others such as the olivet.
Here is Adam Clarke's commentary on Matt 24. If the link fails search on your own because it is readily available.
Clarke errs on Matt 24:34 as he defined genea by strongs definition for Geno's. Elsewhere, the use of genea is never a race but refers to the people of a common lifespan. He errs because he assumes that there is to be a restoration of Jewish polity after a times or fullness of the gentiles have come in. He misunderstands rom 11:25 in that regard. For more on the topic of the word genea as generation vs Geno's as race search Charles samples article titled the greatest hoax.
Otherwise, Much of Clarke's commentary draws from Josephus and his historical record, seemingly providences by God for this purpose.
Here is Adam Clarke's commentary on Matt 24. If the link fails search on your own because it is readily available.
Clarke errs on Matt 24:34 as he defined genea by strongs definition for Geno's. Elsewhere, the use of genea is never a race but refers to the people of a common lifespan. He errs because he assumes that there is to be a restoration of Jewish polity after a times or fullness of the gentiles have come in. He misunderstands rom 11:25 in that regard. For more on the topic of the word genea as generation vs Geno's as race search Charles samples article titled the greatest hoax.
Otherwise, Much of Clarke's commentary draws from Josephus and his historical record, seemingly providences by God for this purpose.
Adam Clarke’s Commentary On Matthew 24 – Preterist Archives
preteristarchives.org