Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Concerning the thief on the cross, I think it is presumptuous to imagine that he was not baptized, considering the scriptures describe the ministry of John as covering all the Jewish region (Luke 3:2-3; Matthew 3:5-6; Mark 1:5; Acts 13:24), and baptizing everyone, save the lawyers and religious leaders (Luke 7:29-30). In light of the scriptures, I think it is reasonable to imagine the thief as previously baptized by John, otherwise, there would be an internal contradiction. (It is easy to imagine the thief as someone who perhaps turned himself in after believing, or was caught after believing, etc.)Some believers would say yes and others would say no to this. It is basically a read the scriptures and decide for yourself.
Argument for yes:
Those that say yes use Acts 2:38 that instructs, "Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
Mark 16:16
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Many say this is a commandment to believers that we must be baptized as Jesus was and this ensures our salvation.
Some also say if you are not fully submerged underwater like Jesus was it does not count as baptism.
Argument for no:
Many say that contextually speaking that Mark 16:16 has some translation issues and may not be properly portrayed.
Some say that because the thief on the cross next to Jesus that was saved and not baptized that it must not be a requirement.
There are also considerations such as, "What if someone lives where they do not have the water to become baptized? What if they are in prison and cannot get baptized (although some prisons have implememted available baptisms)? What if they cannot be submerged, but only sprinkled with water?"
What do you think?
Concerning any translation issues with Mark 16:16, I've never heard of that before: what I have heard is that Mark 16:16 is rejected outright as not being part of the bible: this rejection is upheld by many modern textual critics; however the translation of the existing manuscripts is universally agreed upon, as far as I know.Some believers would say yes and others would say no to this. It is basically a read the scriptures and decide for yourself.
Argument for yes:
Those that say yes use Acts 2:38 that instructs, "Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
Mark 16:16
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Many say this is a commandment to believers that we must be baptized as Jesus was and this ensures our salvation.
Some also say if you are not fully submerged underwater like Jesus was it does not count as baptism.
Argument for no:
Many say that contextually speaking that Mark 16:16 has some translation issues and may not be properly portrayed.
Some say that because the thief on the cross next to Jesus that was saved and not baptized that it must not be a requirement.
There are also considerations such as, "What if someone lives where they do not have the water to become baptized? What if they are in prison and cannot get baptized (although some prisons have implememted available baptisms)? What if they cannot be submerged, but only sprinkled with water?"
What do you think?
Concerning not having water, I think a cursory look at the God of the bible will show, that providing water for His people has never been a problem for Him. Moreover, the scriptures state that God has predestined us according to His foreknowledge, therefore, it follows, that if God foreknows those who would choose to follow Him, then He knows how to provide for their needs. To be concerned about not having water to baptize is not reasonable, because if the God we're talking about cannot provide water for His people, then it is not the God of the bible.Some believers would say yes and others would say no to this. It is basically a read the scriptures and decide for yourself.
Argument for yes:
Those that say yes use Acts 2:38 that instructs, "Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
Mark 16:16
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Many say this is a commandment to believers that we must be baptized as Jesus was and this ensures our salvation.
Some also say if you are not fully submerged underwater like Jesus was it does not count as baptism.
Argument for no:
Many say that contextually speaking that Mark 16:16 has some translation issues and may not be properly portrayed.
Some say that because the thief on the cross next to Jesus that was saved and not baptized that it must not be a requirement.
There are also considerations such as, "What if someone lives where they do not have the water to become baptized? What if they are in prison and cannot get baptized (although some prisons have implememted available baptisms)? What if they cannot be submerged, but only sprinkled with water?"
What do you think?
In summary, I think the act of baptism does nothing, but the obedience to Christ does everything. A good example of this is Simon the sorcerer, who after believing and being baptized, remained with the same unrepentant dark-heart after gain.Some believers would say yes and others would say no to this. It is basically a read the scriptures and decide for yourself.
Argument for yes:
Those that say yes use Acts 2:38 that instructs, "Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
Mark 16:16
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Many say this is a commandment to believers that we must be baptized as Jesus was and this ensures our salvation.
Some also say if you are not fully submerged underwater like Jesus was it does not count as baptism.
Argument for no:
Many say that contextually speaking that Mark 16:16 has some translation issues and may not be properly portrayed.
Some say that because the thief on the cross next to Jesus that was saved and not baptized that it must not be a requirement.
There are also considerations such as, "What if someone lives where they do not have the water to become baptized? What if they are in prison and cannot get baptized (although some prisons have implememted available baptisms)? What if they cannot be submerged, but only sprinkled with water?"
What do you think?
Further, concerning Mark 16:16, I don't agree with the assessment of most modern textual critics concerning Mark 16:16: I believe it is the word of Christ, and must therefore be obeyed.Some believers would say yes and others would say no to this. It is basically a read the scriptures and decide for yourself.
Argument for yes:
Those that say yes use Acts 2:38 that instructs, "Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
Mark 16:16
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Many say this is a commandment to believers that we must be baptized as Jesus was and this ensures our salvation.
Some also say if you are not fully submerged underwater like Jesus was it does not count as baptism.
Argument for no:
Many say that contextually speaking that Mark 16:16 has some translation issues and may not be properly portrayed.
Some say that because the thief on the cross next to Jesus that was saved and not baptized that it must not be a requirement.
There are also considerations such as, "What if someone lives where they do not have the water to become baptized? What if they are in prison and cannot get baptized (although some prisons have implememted available baptisms)? What if they cannot be submerged, but only sprinkled with water?"
What do you think?
Hey, I'm just a nobody that fears God and His Son, so if God baptized Noah, and had Moses baptize Israel, and had His Son baptized by John, and had His Son command baptism, and Jesus commanded His disciples to baptize, and He commanded them to teach baptism, then I'm sorry, but that's the way I'm going to follow, instead of any other way, regardless of how many clever people may suggest otherwise.Ephesians 2:8 Salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus and not by works, which would make water baptism a work towards repentance. John said I must decrease and Jesus increase. John's water baptism was only for repentance as being prepared for the coming of the Lord as the water represented the washing away of sin, or as John put it "prepare ye the way of the Lord". It is not clear in scripture that Jesus ever baptized anyone in water even though He first came to John's water baptism as a fulfillment of prophecy as He had to identify with humanity even though He had no sin. This was the beginning of Christ ministry as the Holy Spirit fell down on Him that day as God gave Him full power and authority here on earth and there after Jesus went about teaching the disciples as it was not Jesus who the Pharisees heard that He baptized more than John did, John 4:1-3 but His disciples baptizing others in water for remission of sin after the death of John the Baptist as all together they would have baptized others in water for the remission of sin then John could at one time. Jesus could not baptize anyone in the Holy Spirit until the day of Pentecost after He ascended up to the Father and the Father sent down the indwelling Holy Spirit, Acts 2.
John 3:5 never mentions the word baptize, but says only by being born of water and spirit, which means water as living water (word of God) that no one can enter into the kingdom of God unless they are Spiritually renewed (born again) by the hearing of the word, which is Christ Jesus and by the Holy Spirit that came on them in the OT and indwells us in the NT. Many do read into the passage a preconceived idea or theology, but baptism is never mentioned in this verse. Word is living water as described in John 4:10; 7:38; 1John 5:6; Jeremiah 2:13; Isaiah 55:1-3 to name a few.
If salvation came by actual immersion in water Jesus clearly could have simply stated, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is baptized by being immersed in water and born of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” Further, if Jesus had made such a statement, He would have contradicted numerous other Bible passages that make it clear that salvation is by faith (John 3:16; John 3:36; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5).
There is the case of the thief on the cross who repented, the women who was to be stoned for adultery, the women at the well, death bed confessions and even those who are incapacitated that can not be immersed in water. Does this mean they are not saved or born again, no. It means that no dirty river water is going to save anyone, but that it is only a symbol of repentance like that of John the baptist who called those to repent first. There is nothing wrong with being dunked in water, but know that it is only an outward appearance to others of what has already taken place Spiritually within you when you repented, accepted Jesus and was indwelled with the Holy Spirit.
Baptism is not mentioned in John chapter three so why do so many believe we are to be dunked in dirty river water as the water can not bring about Gods salvation, but only by faith do we believe as it comes by Gods grace, Ephesians 2:1-10, as we hear the gospel (word/living water) preached to us.
This is what the Jerusalem Bible says:
John 3:3 "I tell you most solemnly, unless a man is born from above, he can not see the kingdom of God."
John 3:5-7 "I tell you most solemnly, unless a man is born through water and the Spirit, he can not enter the kingdom of God. What is born of the flesh is flesh,(sin nature) what is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not be surprised when I say you must be born from above.
One needs to hear the word of God, as word being living water, in order to know they have to be born again of the Spirit in order to see and enter the kingdom of God.
John's baptism was literal, but yet symbolic for cleansing after one repented of their sin. Notice in Mark 1:8 I have baptized you with (actual) water, but he (Jesus) will baptize you with the Holy Spirit. (Not water, but baptize you with the Holy Spirit after you have repented and made clean again through the washing of the word as you become a new creation in Christ.
Jesus never baptized anyone in literal water that we know of and also instructed the Disciples to wait upon the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, Acts chapter 1, and then commissioned them to go out preaching the Gospel (word/living water) and to baptize in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Matthew 28:16-20.
Being born from above means being born from the heavenly word of God, not dirty river water. When Jesus was baptized by John it was for the fulfillment of Messiah come as the Holy Spirit fell down on Him. Jesus had no need of being baptized in water for the remission of sin.
Yes, my pleasure.Religiot
Could you give me the scriptures where God baptized Noah and that Moses baptized Israel? Maybe I have missed that in my studies. There are two different types of baptism. One is in water for remission of sins like John the Baptist did calling all to repent and the other that Peter was talking about in being baptized in the Holy Spirit.
Another question I have is found in Acts 2:14-36 we read about Peter preaching to the crowd that was gathered on the day of Pentecost. These were not only devout Jews from many nations, but also Jews that were gathered together that day that traveled to Jerusalem for the the Feast of Weeks. Were they all about 3000 of them baptized in water that day or were they baptized in the Holy Spirit?
After Peter was done preaching to them they were pricked/convicted in there hearts and asked Peter what they should do. In verse 38 Peter said "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Now keep reading until you get to vs. 41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
Around 3000 were baptized that day, not in water, but baptized in the Holy Spirit just as the disciples were in the upper room.
John 3:3-21 except a man be born again of water and Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Vs.6 that which is born of the Flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Flesh cannot perceive the things of the Spirit and is enmity against God, Romans 8:6, 7.
Sin separates us from God because God is a spirit and can only recognize his own children by what spirit is living in their hearts. We have to renew, rebirth - born again, Gods Spirit within us in order to be called a child of God and see the kingdom of heaven. We now put off the old man (flesh) and put on the new man (Spirit), Colossians 3:1-17. We are renewed by the word of God and through the Holy Spirit teaching us of all things, John 14:26.
The baptism that Peter was talking about in Acts 2:38 was a Spiritual rebirth through the word of God. Some people think it is being dunked or sprinkled with water the way John the Baptist did and there is nothing wrong with that for it is an outward appearance to man that you have repented and received Jesus and the Holy Spirit into your life, Matthew 3:11, but Jesus himself never baptized with water, John 4:2, for the baptism of Jesus was for receiving the Spirit of God (Holy Spirit) that helps us to know the will of the Father, 1 Thessalonians 4:1-12.
Yes, they do.Correct me if im wrong but don't all Christians get baptized?
Yes, my pleasure.
The follow links will take you to scripture illustrations of Noah being baptized and Moses baptizing Israel, respectively:
Baptism Postponement - 033.jpg
drive.google.com
Baptism Postponement - 055.jpg
drive.google.com
Concerning your last question, I must answer with a question, because the underlying presuppositions in your last question are too numerous for me to answer simply; please allow me this, and please bear with me.Religiot
Could you give me the scriptures where God baptized Noah and that Moses baptized Israel? Maybe I have missed that in my studies. There are two different types of baptism. One is in water for remission of sins like John the Baptist did calling all to repent and the other that Peter was talking about in being baptized in the Holy Spirit.
Another question I have is found in Acts 2:14-36 we read about Peter preaching to the crowd that was gathered on the day of Pentecost. These were not only devout Jews from many nations, but also Jews that were gathered together that day that traveled to Jerusalem for the the Feast of Weeks. Were they all about 3000 of them baptized in water that day or were they baptized in the Holy Spirit?
After Peter was done preaching to them they were pricked/convicted in there hearts and asked Peter what they should do. In verse 38 Peter said "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Now keep reading until you get to vs. 41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
Around 3000 were baptized that day, not in water, but baptized in the Holy Spirit just as the disciples were in the upper room.
John 3:3-21 except a man be born again of water and Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Vs.6 that which is born of the Flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Flesh cannot perceive the things of the Spirit and is enmity against God, Romans 8:6, 7.
Sin separates us from God because God is a spirit and can only recognize his own children by what spirit is living in their hearts. We have to renew, rebirth - born again, Gods Spirit within us in order to be called a child of God and see the kingdom of heaven. We now put off the old man (flesh) and put on the new man (Spirit), Colossians 3:1-17. We are renewed by the word of God and through the Holy Spirit teaching us of all things, John 14:26.
The baptism that Peter was talking about in Acts 2:38 was a Spiritual rebirth through the word of God. Some people think it is being dunked or sprinkled with water the way John the Baptist did and there is nothing wrong with that for it is an outward appearance to man that you have repented and received Jesus and the Holy Spirit into your life, Matthew 3:11, but Jesus himself never baptized with water, John 4:2, for the baptism of Jesus was for receiving the Spirit of God (Holy Spirit) that helps us to know the will of the Father, 1 Thessalonians 4:1-12.
I'm very sorry to hear that. Yes, of course:Those links would not open for me so could you just give me the scriptures. Thank you
If you would've read my previous replies to others, you would have known that I do not interpret those scriptures to mean what you have said.
Further, I personally don't know of anyone who interprets those scriptures like you have wrongly said that I do...
1 Peter 3:20-21, says plainly that baptism is a like figure of the flood of Noah, and that it is not the putting away of the dirt on our skin, but the answer of a good conscience toward God.
With all respect, I think it's plain to most bible readers that this passage uses the flood of Noah as an allegory to baptism...
However, I'm more concerned with your contracted citation of Paul--only partly quoting him to make your point--when you ought to have quoted him more fully:
Ephesians 2:8-10:
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
Paul teaches that there's is nothing anyone can do to earn salvation, and that is because it is a gift, which brings about true holiness in those who truly love God, thus Christian works are not to merit salvation, but are simply in obedience to our new Lord, out of a desire to please Him, because we love Him.
Concerning 1Corinthians, the logic is the same, it is simply an allegory to baptism...
I must warn you, concerning the way you handle the scriptures: partial scripture quotations that obscure meaning and contradict complete quotations are a tool Satan tried with the Lord at the end of His forty day fast, when he quoted Psalm 91:11-12, he left out the middle, which says "...to keep thee in all thy ways." The way he quoted it, changed it's meaning, for the original passage is referring to the ways of the righteous, and how the angels prevent the harm of stumbling on a stone, yet Satan used it to mean jumping off of a cliff! The Lord simply responded by quoting another scripture that demonstrated the contradiction inherent in Satan's contracted quotation.
Be warned further, that the writings of Paul are the only writings foretold to be twisted by the unlearned, and to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the scriptures (2 Peter 3:15-16).
I think that if you read all of my replies to similar objections, you will find my belief to be grounded in the stone of simplicity, and therefore, unmovable by the winds of complexity.
Please reconsider your position, or at the very least, fear God enough not to continue to try to convince others against the necessity of obedience to Christ (John 3:36; Mark 16:16).