Ernest T. Bass
Member
Some are under the wrong impression that God's grace must be unconditional else man would be trying to earn grace by "working" a condition. Is that the case?
Namaan was told to dip in the Jordan river 7 times and he would be cleansed of his disease.
1) it's undeniable that his cleansing was of grace
2) it's undeniable that he had to "work", i.e., meet the condition of dipping in the river
So who would argue he earned or merited his healing and it was not of God's unmerited favor/grace?
Jesus once spat on the ground creating a mixture he put in a blind man's eyes. Jesus then instructs the man to go and wash his eyes in a pool of water. When the man did as Jesus said he gained his sight.
1) it's undeniable his healing was of grace
2) it's undeniable he had to "work", meet the condition of washing his eyes in the pool.
So who would argue his healing was earned and not of grace?
When it comes to salvation God's grace has always been conditional. For us to be saved, receiving God's grace is conditional upon us believing, Jn 3:16; repenting, Lk 13:3,5; confessing with the mouth, Rom 10:9,10; and being water baptized, Mk 16:16. Many will falsely accuse me of having a 'works based salvation' where I am trying to earn salvation whereby salvation is of debt and not of grace. Yet will these same people accuse Namman or the blind man of earning their healing and it was not of grace when they met conditions?
Namaan was told to dip in the Jordan river 7 times and he would be cleansed of his disease.
1) it's undeniable that his cleansing was of grace
2) it's undeniable that he had to "work", i.e., meet the condition of dipping in the river
So who would argue he earned or merited his healing and it was not of God's unmerited favor/grace?
Jesus once spat on the ground creating a mixture he put in a blind man's eyes. Jesus then instructs the man to go and wash his eyes in a pool of water. When the man did as Jesus said he gained his sight.
1) it's undeniable his healing was of grace
2) it's undeniable he had to "work", meet the condition of washing his eyes in the pool.
So who would argue his healing was earned and not of grace?
When it comes to salvation God's grace has always been conditional. For us to be saved, receiving God's grace is conditional upon us believing, Jn 3:16; repenting, Lk 13:3,5; confessing with the mouth, Rom 10:9,10; and being water baptized, Mk 16:16. Many will falsely accuse me of having a 'works based salvation' where I am trying to earn salvation whereby salvation is of debt and not of grace. Yet will these same people accuse Namman or the blind man of earning their healing and it was not of grace when they met conditions?
Last edited by a moderator: