New Law Coming From Congress

[Alfred Persson]

There was some fraud, but not enough to change the outcome. For example, the evidence shows that Donald Trump pretty much had the "dead voter" bloc to himself. Would you like me to show you that?

Doesn't matter. It is well-documented.

Man Charged for Voting as Dead Mother for Trump in 3rd Case of Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania​

Man Charged for Voting as Dead Mother for Trump in Pennsylvania Fraud Case

"If he had voted for Joe Biden or he had written Donald Duck or Mickey Mouse, we would still be prosecuting this case," Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer said.

www.newsweek.com

Man arrested in wife's murder now accused of voting for Trump in her name​

Man arrested in wife's murder now accused of voting for Trump in her name

A Colorado man arrested this month for allegedly murdering his missing wife has also been accused of voting for former President Donald Trump in her name.

abcnews.go.com

Nevada Man Is Charged With Voting Using His Dead Wife’s Ballot​

Donald Kirk Hartle, a Republican, had claimed that someone voted in the 2020 election by using the mail-in ballot of his wife, who died in 2017. He now faces two counts of voter fraud.

Nevada Man Is Charged With Voting Using His Dead Wife’s Ballot (Published 2021)

Donald Kirk Hartle, a Republican, had claimed that someone voted in the 2020 election by using the mail-in ballot of his wife, who died in 2017. He now faces two counts of voter fraud.

www.nytimes.com

How many would you like to see?

Let's see... you want a trial to find out whether or not the republicans (who supported Trump) running the elections, cheated to let Biden win? Seriously? Georgia Republicans tried three recounts and just couldn't find a way to make it work.

Belief isn't what counts. Evidence (like the evidence I just showed you) counts. There certainly was fraud, but it wasn't close to enough to change the outcome.

Trump and his underlings launched dozens of lawsuits that were examined in court. They lost because they had no evidence. You think one more lawsuit will turn it around? Seriously?

The interview discusses how mail in ballots created opportunity for fraud that can't be discovered. It was an incredible interview. I am shocked how close to tyranny this country is.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson

 

[Barbarian]

Ha! A politician at loss for words, double idiocy. Couldn't say "opposite of a biological male ", lose too many voters?

He was a republican, so it probably never occurred to him that someone might ask him. The correct answer, BTW, is "an adult human lacking a Y chromosome."

 

[Barbarian]

The interview discusses how mail in ballots created opportunity for fraud that can't be discovered.

The point of the story, is that it was discovered and the perp was arrested. Which seems to rule out your belief.

 

[Barbarian]

Latest news, he was vindicated.

The Texas Senate failed to get enough of his fellow republicans to convict him. And of course, he's still going to trial for securities fraud. And he had to pay a huge settlement to some of his staffers whom he slandered when they turned him in for corruption.

That might be "vindication" in today's republican party, but nowhere else.

 

[Barbarian]

Trump did so much to restore America's wealth and bring about world piece

He was the first American president to be publicly laughed at in the UN. He lost the leadership of NATO. He surrendered to the Taliban in Afghanistan. GDP and real wages cratered on his watch, mostly because of his bungling the pandemic.

C'mon.

Even his own justice department pointed out that the election was fair and valid. The fraud I mentioned did happen, but there wasn't enough of it to save Trump.

 

[Barbarian]

See? They made no claims of fraud at all.

Instead, they argued that other states changing their election laws disenfranchised voters in their states. However, one of the major flaws in that argument is that Republican-run states did the same thing!

Today's winner.

 

[Barbarian]

The states wanted evidence, a trial to judge whether fraud did change the outcome. There was massive belief fraud did.

Unfortunately, "I really believe this is true, Judge!" isn't a very good legal argument. Evidence is required. Which is why Trump lost all those lawsuits trying to reverse the election results.

 

[Uncle J]

Trump did so much to restore America's wealth and bring about world piece, we owed it to him to really revisit all the changes that were made to election laws, and reverse those that contradict voting on the same "election day", in person, with paper ballots that can be counted by opposing parties. Mail in ballots are where all the fraud happens, everyone knows that.

No way you just posted that. You really think courts should give deference to Trump's claims just because you believe he was a good President?

That's how you think the legal system should work? Sheesh.

 

[Alfred Persson]

No way you just posted that. You really think courts should give deference to Trump's claims just because you believe he was a good President?

That's how you think the legal system should work? Sheesh.

Yes. Hitler would have been fairly treated, how much more so should Trump who did excellent things for the country.

 

[Uncle J]

Yes. Hitler would have been fairly treated, how much more so should Trump who did excellent things for the country.

Not only is that nuts, it's completely un-American.

 

[Alfred Persson]

He was the first American president to be publicly laughed at in the UN. He lost the leadership of NATO. He surrendered to the Taliban in Afghanistan. GDP and real wages cratered on his watch, mostly because of his bungling the pandemic.

C'mon.

Even his own justice department pointed out that the election was fair and valid. The fraud I mentioned did happen, but there wasn't enough of it to save Trump.

That's a parallel universe, the dark zone. Trump was respected in the light zone, leader of Nato they all agreed to increase their contributions; He was ending Bush's endless war and would have kept the large air base in perpetuity, and taken all our military equipment out, and no one would have died, and the "collaborators" would have been brought to America and no Americans left behind; GDP and real wages were skyrocketing.

His only miscalculation, letting the left use the Pandemic to steal the election via changing voting laws. He didn't see that coming.

 

[Alfred Persson]

Not only is that nuts, it's completely un-American.

What's happening now is unAmerican:

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson

 

[Uncle J]

What's happening now is unAmerican:

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson

Mindless non-response noted.

 

[Barbarian]

That's a parallel universe, the dark zone. Trump was respected in the light zone, leader of Nato they all agreed to increase their contributions;

They laughed at him...

And manipulated him like he was a spoiled little kid:

Trump's complaints and criticism of NATO led officials to worry about his intentions for the alliance.
After he took office, NATO officials mounted a campaign of quiet maneuvers and public diplomacy to placate and distract him. The alliance survived thanks largely to the skills of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, new research shows.

How NATO leaders used quiet maneuvers and 'adroit flattery' to keep Trump from blowing up the alliance

The alliance survived Trump thanks largely to the skills of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, new research shows.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[Alfred Persson]

They laughed at him...

And manipulated him like he was a spoiled little kid:

Trump's complaints and criticism of NATO led officials to worry about his intentions for the alliance.
After he took office, NATO officials mounted a campaign of quiet maneuvers and public diplomacy to placate and distract him. The alliance survived thanks largely to the skills of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, new research shows.

How NATO leaders used quiet maneuvers and 'adroit flattery' to keep Trump from blowing up the alliance

The alliance survived Trump thanks largely to the skills of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, new research shows.

www.businessinsider.com

They laugh at all of us, also. Contempt for the governed. The left likes it, because they can rail against those who object to the sexualization of children, or perversion of marriage, and the killing of babies. But the rest of us do not.

 

[Barbarian]

They laugh at all of us, also.

Trump does.

Contempt for the governed.

He called those of us who served in the U.S. armed forces "suckers" and "losers." So I guess it's true for him, at least. But other NATO leaders laughed at him for being such an idiot. And they managed him by treating him like a cranky infant.