Murder itself is not defined by the degree of punishment. As I posted earlier, from Merriam-Webster:Doesn't matter what you want to call it. If 3rd degree MURDER might get you 5-10 years in prison, or if 2nd degree MURDER might get a stiffer punishment of 10 to 25 years in prison, while 1st degree MURDER would get the stiffest penalty under the law, that being up to multiple life sentences in prison, or even the ultimate payment in death.
Now being that all these degrees of MURDER have varying degrees of punishment for the said crimes, and also seeing that you are unable to define any sort of penal measures for the act of an abortion, then rightly, how can you justify calling it murder? Perhaps that argument would best be made by the avenger of the blood.
: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
: to kill (a human being) unlawfully and with premeditated malice
Your arguments are deeply flawed. So, for the third time, are you arguing that because there is no law against abortion that therefore it isn’t murder?
None of this is relevant.Oh, come on now. I know you now the story in the bible, about the mob of people running after the adulterous women seeking to stone her to death; when Jesus stepped in and said let he who is without sin cast the first stone. You are akin to those of the mob running after the adulterous women with stones in their hands, ready to judge the harlot with child, with no penal measure under the law, carrying with them only the threat of God's judgement.
Paul himself was a murderer, yet he became chief among the Apostles. I suppose there is room for redemption for those who have had an abortion. But what of those who worship at the alter of the unborn fetus? Do they require yet another sacrifice for redemption?