The difference between our views is that I understand "destroy" differently than you. Because of such verses as Matt 25:46, 2 Thess 1:9 and Rev 20:10, I'm convinced that unbelievers will suffer ECT. No way around it. If one simply ceases to exist at some point, there can be no concept of eternal.When they are destroyed on the day of judgment. 2 Peter 3:7
But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.
So, after reading 2 Peter 3:7 do you still believe that the ungodly are not destroyed on the day of judgment and destruction?
My view of physical death is exactly the same as James' view, as described in James 2:26 - "For just as the body without the spirit is dead-" NASB. When the spirit separates from the body, the body is said to be dead.What do you mean by physical death? Is this a kind of death where the dying person remains alive?
As well, when the spirit is separated from God by being cast into the lake of fire per Rev 20:15, they experience the second death. Their spirit is still conscious. But their condition is said to be spiritual death - permament separation from God.
All humans are born "dead in sins" per Eph 2:1. That means humans are separated from God at birth. Their souls/spirits are conscious but they are separated from God. When one believes, they become "spiritually alive" per Eph 2:5. This is the second birth or new birth. They will live with God for eternity because they have His life, which is eternal.
Those who never received the gift of eternal life will experience (consciously) separation from God by being cast into the lake of fire.
If you think I'm wrong, please address each point I've just made and refute my points by using the very verses I've used. Don't think you can refute me (my verses) with other verses. The Bible doesn't work that way.
Once someone no longer exists, they don't experience ANYTHING. How cdan punishment be exacted on one who doesn't exist? I don't recall that you've ever addressed that.You asking this again. You assume that being destroyed is no punishment. I don't agree with that.
Well, that's my point. If one doesn't "feel it", how can it be considered a punishment. It would be like spanking someone in a coma. Not real smart.Destruction is the punishment, whether or not the destroyed person can feel it.
Well, the Bible NEVER ever says that EL is a reward. It is a gift, not a reward. And the punishment is not "losing out on EL", but experiencing the second death. Which is a conscious experience. For eternity. ECT.Your question makes no sense. Having eternal life is the reward, losing out on having eternal life is the punishment. I don't know why you don't understand this.
I make no assumptions. The Bible is clear on the concept of "eternal punishment" and being "tormented night and day forever and ever" in the lake of fire, which all unsaved will be cast into. You've made the assumption that they will cease to exist by your very limited application of the single word "destroy".No, it does not. You ASSUME that the eternal punishment is eternal consciousness. Eternal Destruction is the eternal punishment.
I will say it again: if one simply ceases to exist, there is NOTHING to experience. You've not shown otherwise.LIFE is better than DESTRUCTION.
I will give you a very clear example to demonstrate how incorrect you are. If one is in an auto crash, and injured severely, which would be "better": conscious of the injuries, or in a coma?Being destroyed is a punishment because the offender is given something WORSE than they would have had otherwise.
You haven't proven your assumption. When one ceases to exist, there is no more concept of time, or eternity. And their not being conscious removes any concept of punishment, which you haven't admitted. The Bible SAYS "eternal punishment". One MUST be conscious in order to experience punishment.Destruction is eternal, since the person who is destroyed remains destroyed forever.
Why would spanking someone who deserves it but is in a coma make sense? Wouldn't one rather first wait or try to get them out of the coma so that they can experience their punishment? Of course they would.
You've made a very serious error in understanding my view. I've NEVER said the unsaved will have eternal life. I've always said they experience the second death, which is eternal and conscious.Your belief that the unsaved will have eternal life being tormented alive forever goes against Matthew 25:46 because it is only the other group that goes off to eternal life, not both groups. You doctrine contradicts this scripture.
Please stop making the error that being conscious equals being "alive". The Bible is very clear on terms. There is physical life and death just as there is spiritual life and death. I don't think you understand these principles.