People should celebrate the criminalisation of coercive control, just need to check the rules first to see if only those who do what someone else wants them to do are allowed out to enjoy a meal and allowed to have a job only if they do what someone else what's them to do and of not get penalised for it.
Christian Forums
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
-
We stand with Ukraine. Please consider supporting Ukraine through a qualified organization. -
Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
Study shows Pfizer Vaccine Becomes DNA in Liver Cells
- Thread starter christian1724
- Start date
It doesn't make sense. I mean people are told to get a covid test if they have cold or flu like symptoms and because it's negative for covid they dont have to isolate. The responsible thing to do would be to isolate anyhow. Why does anyone who has a test go out, it might not be covid but it could be any other virus or cold so stay home until well. That's standard practice.
To not clog up the system people were always told if they have cold or flu like symptoms to get tested for 19. That's like millions and millions of tests so that means millions an millions of people had cold or flu like symptoms. And a high % come back negative for 19 so people probably thought it was ok they can go back to work or school or out on public because there test is negative and they not forced to isolate. But if you have cold or flu like symptoms be it 19 or not should always take time off until feel better not go out. In employment contracts sick leave is there for a reason, if your unwell you don't go to work, no one else wants to get sick.
Sometimes you see it people out coughing or sniffing a runny nose and it's like what are you doing stay home in bed and watch TV or something and get someone else to get your essential items. The same practice like lockdown where people were allowed to get someone else's items for them and drop it at the front door. Might be hard for those who live alone but most probably have there neighbours or family members who can help them out. I done it before someone with 19, I went out and got there food and dropped in at there door step, and my Dad who is vulnerable I went out and got his food for him in lockdown.
Even I have said I'm not a fan of lockdowns and complained but I do think lockdown did have good health practices within in that people should follow in general of they sick. I don't know the science behind masks but like in some countries if people are sick they wear a mask when they go out, at least there intentions are good to try contain there cold or flu and not pass it on to others of they need to go out.
Even I have said I'm not a fan of lockdowns and complained but I do think lockdown did have good health practices within in that people should follow in general of they sick. I don't know the science behind masks but like in some countries if people are sick they wear a mask when they go out, at least there intentions are good to try contain there cold or flu and not pass it on to others of they need to go out.
Now things are opening up and masks are not mandatory anymore I still see people wearing masks, probably the most vulnerable protecting themselves and those who are sick trying to contain a cold or flu if they have no option but to go out, while everyone else who is not sick or vulnerable are not wearing a mask. That's health practice. That's normal.
I had Covid Nov 2020, no RNA shots yet available so no choice. Antibodies tested a year later were still significant. The common cold hits me harder than that virus. I got a lot of projects done and my husband worked home office although also positive so the quarantine was a bit of a free holiday.
I followed the stats and between 1-2% of those positive died. This was true before and after the injections were available/required. The average age of death was around 71 years old. This made me doubt the “pandemic” status.
England has done a study and the consequences of those RNA shots are greater than the virus itself and some will suffer their whole lives.
It is also clear that natural immunity is superior to those injections which is true of almost all illnesses for known reasons.
My advice is under no circumstances take those injections. If I were 71 I still wouldn’t do it. People who are over 70 die. It’s a fact.
Now as for putting others at risk, it’s clear the injected can spread it as easily as anyone else. In Europe, the majority getting sick were injected and boosted. And they spread it until they were quarantined. So do not listen to the government. They do not follow the science. They have a different goal.
I followed the stats and between 1-2% of those positive died. This was true before and after the injections were available/required. The average age of death was around 71 years old. This made me doubt the “pandemic” status.
England has done a study and the consequences of those RNA shots are greater than the virus itself and some will suffer their whole lives.
It is also clear that natural immunity is superior to those injections which is true of almost all illnesses for known reasons.
My advice is under no circumstances take those injections. If I were 71 I still wouldn’t do it. People who are over 70 die. It’s a fact.
Now as for putting others at risk, it’s clear the injected can spread it as easily as anyone else. In Europe, the majority getting sick were injected and boosted. And they spread it until they were quarantined. So do not listen to the government. They do not follow the science. They have a different goal.
Free
Member
Good for you. A lot of people died and many more will have lasting negative effects from having COVID.
Please post your sources.
And, yet, young, healthy people still died.
Please post a link to the study.
This is simply not true. Natural immunity wanes just as vaccine immunity wanes. Both unvaxxed and vaxxed have had COVID more than once, even just a few months apart.
That's a pretty insensitive, garbage way of putting it for all those who have died or lost loved ones. The fact is that the vaccines saved many lives, saved hospitals from being more overwhelmed than they already were, and saved many more from getting a more serious case of COVID.
Post your sources.
Please post your sources.
The governments followed the science. It's the vaccine and pandemic deniers that ignored the science.
The people in government follow the money $$$$ .
Free
Member
They followed the science.
While real and unfortunate, such negative effects are rare. That is what the data shows. Given that the purpose of vaccines is to cause the same response in the body as COVID, to a lesser severity, it is reasonable to believe that people who did poorly with the vaccines would have done at least as poorly with COVID. This is why there is a number of side-effects from vaccines that are the same as negative effects from COVID. The undeniable facts are that getting vaccinated is magnitudes of order safer than getting COVID.
1.2% USA . Canada 1.0% From John Hopkins University & Medicine Mortality in the most affected countries
Follow the money $$$$
Free
Member
Where is the breakdown before and after vaccinations?
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
Please, stop making this silly argument. There are $$$ on all sides.
And they made a ton.
Those who chose to blindly believe the government and complied have a deep emotional stake in continuing to do so. No one likes to admit they were duped. The only part to be aware of for those who think is that the group supporting the government decision too often will display a racist kind of actual hatred for those who do not comply. They trusted the government and gave them their bodies for the big experiment and cannot tolerate any other choice. This lack of tolerance tells us a great deal about who is behind this.
This is it afik . This page was last updated on Monday, May 16, 2022 at 06:01 AM EDT.
Money on the farmco side and the politico side and they decide if you need another booster or another booster or a booster booster . We the people get boosted not the $$ .
Whose making $$$$ by not getting those injections???
Sounds like a conflict of interests.
Throughout the crises I looked up the number of positive cases and the number of dead and did the math. Always the same before and after. And the numbers are really worse because if you came into
the hospital with a broken leg and tested positive, you were “hospitalized for covid” even if free of symptoms. If you died 24 hours after the shot, it was never the shot. If you were getting tested and on the way home died in an accident, if the test was positive, you died of covid. This is not an exaggeration.