Dorothy Mae
Member
In case someone does not know, the temple in Jerusalem that Jesus predicted would be destroyed was in 70AD. The short version is the Jews had rebelled against Rome and their policy was that all rebellion was put down mercilessly and as swiftly as possible. So the Romans under General Titus attacked the city and inadvertently the temple furnishings caught fire and the whole thing was destroyed. The gold decorating the temple melted and ran down so that the soldiers afterwards upturned all the stones looking for the gold so that no literal stone was left upon another. Jesus said this would happen in Matthew 24 and so it happened as he predicted.
My question to the futurists (those who believe the events of Matter 24 and Revelation are to come) how you deal with this obvious fulfillment of those predictions. There is no denying that this event was fulfilled in the past.
To make matters worse for you, he told the believers that when they see Jerusalem surrounded by armies to leave the city. He used the typical Hebrew what we call exaggeration of not even going back and getting some stuff if you are out in the field to impress upon them the imperative. It was actually quite some days before the surrounding armies left (for no known reason) and the destroying army returned. The christians living then thought that Jesus' prediction about the destruction was for them and they left town and went to Jabba, I believe. No christians were living in Jerusalem at the time the temple fell. Matthew 24 predictions were for them and they knew it and saved themselves by leaving (no one whisked them away out of danger.)
So do you look for a new temple to be rebuilt so it can be destroyed? Do you take part of Matthew 24 being fulfilled but not all (which is what I do as well just different parts?) Were you not aware that this prediction of Jesus was fulfilled in that generation?
My question to the futurists (those who believe the events of Matter 24 and Revelation are to come) how you deal with this obvious fulfillment of those predictions. There is no denying that this event was fulfilled in the past.
To make matters worse for you, he told the believers that when they see Jerusalem surrounded by armies to leave the city. He used the typical Hebrew what we call exaggeration of not even going back and getting some stuff if you are out in the field to impress upon them the imperative. It was actually quite some days before the surrounding armies left (for no known reason) and the destroying army returned. The christians living then thought that Jesus' prediction about the destruction was for them and they left town and went to Jabba, I believe. No christians were living in Jerusalem at the time the temple fell. Matthew 24 predictions were for them and they knew it and saved themselves by leaving (no one whisked them away out of danger.)
So do you look for a new temple to be rebuilt so it can be destroyed? Do you take part of Matthew 24 being fulfilled but not all (which is what I do as well just different parts?) Were you not aware that this prediction of Jesus was fulfilled in that generation?