Dorothy Mae
Member
The difficulty is if we say Paul was wrong, then what else in the Bible is wrong? We saw off the branch we are sitting on.Or, maybe he wasn't wrong and we just have to understand how he viewed the "whole world" (think of a map of the globe with no North, Central, South America, no Russia, no China, missing most of Africa and all of Antarctica, and none of the Pacific, Atlantic, or Indian Ocean Islands.)
Think he could be right if we consider how he saw the "whole world?"
Yeah, I bet that's it.
It’s really easier to say Paul was right, that was exactly what Jesus meant, and the end of that age came. It’s really a whole lot easier to accept the obvious…Occams razor.