I'm not un-romantic.
I just have different ideas of romantic-ness (romanticism? romance? what's the right word?)
Maybe that's why I'm single.
Oh, I think some people just enjoy being single. Nothing wrong with that. Though, my son, when he was young, was adamant that he'd never marry. Today, he's married with two kids, and the happiest husband and father I can imagine.
I'd be okay with chivaleric stuff if it is two-sided. Like, it's fine if a guy pays for my dinner, if for the second date I invite him and pay for his dinner.
I'm not opposed to bringing gifts to a date, but it shouldn't be something unimaginative like flowers, but something more personal or unique. Usually you've been talking to a person a few times before the first date, so you have an idea of what they may like (one pretty cool gift I got from a guy I was dating was the first book of the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" series, after we'd been talking about intelligent comedy literature two days before and I'd admitted I'd never read the Hitchhiker's guide books before but would love to. So that was a non-standard and very individual date gift no more expensive than flowers would be. He also wrote a personal dedication into the book). Also, gifts should be a mutual thing. That means it should be okay if I give presents to my date as well.
Nothing wrong with pursuing each other. But one-sidedness isn't good, and
guys thinking of chivalery as an investment into hopefully
getting laid (or married - and then laid) isn't good either.