Tony Hyman
Member
- May 25, 2013
- 285
- 110
I agree that every should do his or her best to "read" the Scriptures in todays context, back in the days of Christ only trained scribes could..According to Metzger "The Text of the New Testament" they even got paid per page ( papyrus), so ordinary believers either Christian or stickers to the OT Jews rejecting Christ would be utterly dependent on what the Priest's divine message. There is a responsibility on all believers as to daily study the Scriptures , "not bread alone" Matthew 4:4 cf Deut 8:3.The person(no matter who) giving a sermon today is however held accountable to ensure that the flock whether or not they can read. He must nevertheless to"Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth."Therefore the responsibility would be on both preacher and listener , to ensure that this truth is understood and carried out.We really need to stop looking at what we consider "BAD" Churches to examine what the Word says. The Tithe is not a OT ruling as we are the seed of Abraham and blessed with faithful Abraham. Abraham gave the tenth based on him personally wanting to put God first and by faith, not by some law.
Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils.
(Heb 7:4)
If someone tries to get money out of us by laying on the guilt trip of stealing from God, then it's our own fault for not examining the Word better, not the churches fault. Any giving we do should not be motivated out of necessity (The act of feeling pressured to give based on a presumed need.)
.
Comments by prominent theologians are by no means inspired Scripture and one should follow as the Spirit guides as we read. Stll I think a little help can do no harm.In trying to get the grips of the" tithes" as referred to in Heb 7 :5 Donald Guthrie " The comparison which the writer intends to make is not between Abraham and Melchizedeck , but between Aaron and Melchizedeck ..This explines the sudden reference to Levi.( i.e. as in Brother Mike's "not some law" my insert)
In the matter of rights Melchizedek differed from the Levitical priests in that he recieved tithes , not by command , but by the spontaneous action of Abraham.No attempt is made in this epistle to explain why Abraham tithed his spoils..The writer is content to leave this matter."Hebrews Tyndale Commentaries Unquote
So it remains a matter of the 'heart' as God says "..I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts."Jeremiah 31:33