Jethro Bodine
Member
I used to be for the 'majority rules' kind of church structure. It seemed right that the congregation gets to vote for the pastor and elders they want over them, and the church budget, etc. But I know now that only God's anointed leaders should make those decisions. It serves a kind of self-validating way of identifying true ministry. For false, or just plain un-anointed leaders, by virtue of having no power, will simply fail to meet the needs of the true body of Christ and the true body will leave--which is what should happen. And if those in the church can't recognize and appreciate the godly good that true anointed leadership is doing (because they are of the world), they need to leave, which they probably will do.You are absolutely right Sandy. Usually, the men coming out of Bible Colleges these days are young and with no experience in standing up to the leadership of a church that they have been called too, just ends up to be pushed around by these leaders who are in charge of money coming in, and attendance. Unless this new preacher is convinced that Jesus has installed him in that church, he will buckle down to the desires of the leadership.
This all comes back to the church being all about the pastor, the head elder, being in charge. Everything centers around him, not the church set up to minister the truth the pastor may, or may not, have. The pastor should be calling the shots on how deeply grounded he thinks he should be in a community, not the church itself. The way it is now, people decide if they're going to have a church, instead of the pastor, the one with the actual ministry, deciding where a church will be, if at all---the way it should be.
Last edited: