Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

[_ Old Earth _] EVOLUTION - A BELIEVER'S PERSPECTIVE

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Photons have zero rest mass.

Photons never rest.

Photons are massive.


1) Then Einstein was wrong????

A mass can move with the speed of light???

2) Can you give me an example of a Photon that can rest?
The evidence seems to be that Photons always move with the speed of light.
 
Einstein has been wrong. He's not God, you know.

But that has nothing to do with what we are talking about here.

Special relativity states that a particle WITH rest mass cannot move at the speed of light.

Photons do not have rest mass. So what you are talking about is inapplicable.
 
Einstein has been wrong. He's not God, you know.

But that has nothing to do with what we are talking about here.

Special relativity states that a particle WITH rest mass cannot move at the speed of light.

Photons do not have rest mass. So what you are talking about is inapplicable.


1) Nonsense.

No particle can travel at C if it has mass.

2) Photons have a rest mass of zero because they have no mass at the speed of light either.


3) Photons are energy.
Energy is something which can be changed into mass.

What sense would Einstien's ewuation make if the meaning was that energy was mass before any change???

To say that Energy can be changed into mass and visa verse would be meaningless if both were ALREADY mass.
 
1) Nonsense.

No particle can travel at C if it has mass.

2) Photons have a rest mass of zero because they have no mass at the speed of light either.


3) Photons are energy.
Energy is something which can be changed into mass.

What sense would Einstien's ewuation make if the meaning was that energy was mass before any change???

To say that Energy can be changed into mass and visa verse would be meaningless if both were ALREADY mass.


1. Neutrinos are particles. Neutrinos travel faster than the spped of light.

2. That's what defines a particle's rest mass, eh? Better try again.

3. lol. Mass energy equivalence is the concept that mass of a particle is a measurement of its energy content. Mass is a property of energy. Energy is a property of mass and they are connected by a constant, the speed of light.

The equation E = mc2 indicates that energy always exhibits relativistic mass in whatever form the energy takes. Mass–energy equivalence does not imply that mass may be "converted" to energy, but it allows for matter to be converted to energy.


In short, the equation does not say, or is it meant to say, that energy can be changed into mass or vice versa so your conclusion is irrelevant to the actual implications of the equation.
 
1.

Neutrinos are particles. Neutrinos travel faster than the spped of light..


Or so the people at CERN thought until they tried to replicate the experiment.

The LATEST news is that Einstein remains correct, neutrinos do NOT travel faster than Photons.
 

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Back
Top