Greetings,
We understand that all of God's works are done since the beginning. But this is where it's tricky b/c it's okay to say all His works WERE (past tense) done from the beginning, but not okay to say, from 'before' the beginning. If there were no Light or no Matter what of the third part of everything we know, Time? What if all there was were a tight packed energy thingy? even if there were such a thing, it simply could not be or behave like Time, as we know it. Since time may not have existed it might not be proper to say, 'before...'
So we are left with yet another conundrum. Now, let us change thinking: think about what we know about 'Dark Matter'. There is evidence of its' existance, substantial evidence even if the evidence is not technically, a 'substance,' but it is still (pardon the pun) substantial.
Briefly, there isn't enough measurable mass to balance the Big-Bang equations if we want to preserve Laws like Conservation of Matter or Conservation of Energy.
So here we are, offering a semi-plausible explanation. Dark Energy comes at no charge with this.
Consider for a moment what might happen if instead of inventing the new concept of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, what if we just called the stuff, "DARKNESS".
What then if we recall that God said He created both the Light and the Darkness. What if this stuff was more than a absence.
What if the darkness that God spoke of was a clue and it was the Substantial Non-Substance that we've been looking for.
Wouldn't that shed light on the whole thing? (Again, pardon the pun).
Cordially yours with yet another original concept. God does not tell fibs.
We will know all things. God is pouring out Knowledge upon the whole earth. And still, here we are on our knees, "Speak, Your servant hears.
We understand that all of God's works are done since the beginning. But this is where it's tricky b/c it's okay to say all His works WERE (past tense) done from the beginning, but not okay to say, from 'before' the beginning. If there were no Light or no Matter what of the third part of everything we know, Time? What if all there was were a tight packed energy thingy? even if there were such a thing, it simply could not be or behave like Time, as we know it. Since time may not have existed it might not be proper to say, 'before...'
So we are left with yet another conundrum. Now, let us change thinking: think about what we know about 'Dark Matter'. There is evidence of its' existance, substantial evidence even if the evidence is not technically, a 'substance,' but it is still (pardon the pun) substantial.
Briefly, there isn't enough measurable mass to balance the Big-Bang equations if we want to preserve Laws like Conservation of Matter or Conservation of Energy.
So here we are, offering a semi-plausible explanation. Dark Energy comes at no charge with this.
Consider for a moment what might happen if instead of inventing the new concept of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, what if we just called the stuff, "DARKNESS".
What then if we recall that God said He created both the Light and the Darkness. What if this stuff was more than a absence.
What if the darkness that God spoke of was a clue and it was the Substantial Non-Substance that we've been looking for.
Wouldn't that shed light on the whole thing? (Again, pardon the pun).
Cordially yours with yet another original concept. God does not tell fibs.
We will know all things. God is pouring out Knowledge upon the whole earth. And still, here we are on our knees, "Speak, Your servant hears.
Last edited:
