Lol. I am not revising, it is you.Your revision of Genesis to make it literal doesn't change it. Let God decide.
To maintain your new beliefs, you have to reject physics, genetics, geology, astronomy... No point in denying the fact.
If science was like that, I'd hate it as much as you do. Science doesn't reject miracles. It just follows evidence where there is evidence. Your problem is fixable. Go learn about it and then you can talk intelligently about it.
Most likely, I was studying Genesis before you were born.
(species defined)
A population of interbreeding animals. This is the major problem creationists have. If creationism were true; there'd be nice, neat divisions between species, between genera and so on. But there are all sorts of half-species and so on. This, as Darwin pointed out, is strong evidence for biological evolution. But it's an unsolvable mystery for creationists.
They are evidence of a common ancestor. "Created kind" is just an imaginary idea you added to it All evolved organisms are created. You just don't like the way God does it.
Nope. Remember when I told you not knowing anything about evolution was hurting you? It just did again. New alleles appear all the time, and as you learned add genetic information. Want some examples?
Evolution is God's direct action. It's His creation, after all. Set your pride aside and let Him have it His way.
Nope. Think back. What did I tell you? Did you forget? The Earth brought forth living things. Not poofed, but made by natural means. Evolution just explains how that happened.
Yep. You just don't approve of the way He did it. We got that.
Wrong. God is no mere "designer." Humans must design. God creates. Have some respect for God. And as you learned, evolution is observed happening in all populations, including humans. Would you like some examples?
We call them "transitionals." And even honest creationists admit that there are many of them:
Darwin’s fourth expectation — of stratomorphic series — has been confirmed by such examples as the early bird series,33 the tetrapod series,34,35 the whale series,36the various mammal series of the Cenozoic37 (for example, the horse series, the camel series, the elephant series, the pig series, thetitanothere series, etc.), the Cantius and Plesiadapus primate series,38 and the hominid series.39 Evidence for not just one but for all three of the species level and above types of stratomorphic intermediates expected by macroevolutionary theory is surely strong evidence for macroevolutionary theory. Creationists therefore need to accept this fact.
YE creationist Dr. Kurt Wise, Toward a Creationist Understanding of Transitional Forms
(regarding genetic identication of common descent)
Nope. We can do it on a lineage of animals for which we have documentation of descent. It always works.
No.
Show your work. If you don't know how to measure genetic gain, just say so, and I'll show you.
Genetic information is found by summing the products of the frequency of each allele by the log of the frequency of each allele.
So for two alleles, each 0.5 frequency, the information is 2(fa x log(fa)) or about 0,30
If mutation produces a third allele that so that we have three alleles with a frequency each of 0.3333, then the information is 3(fa x log(fa)) or about 0.47.
Which is an increase. I used the above numbers to make it simpler for you, but if you'd like different frequencies, I could do that for you as well.
It works the same way. And yes, if an allele is lost, the information decreases. In many cases, speciation occurs by reducing information, and subsequent new mutations. This is usually the way speciation happens. Would you like to learn why?
Babies are born. You realize that each of us is a creature of God, do you not?
nope. it is you who have to reject entropy. I hate it when evolutionists try to use ALL OF science as a shield for bioevo. It is one of their biggest strawmen.
Your posts show no evidence of a long time reading of Genesis.
Created kind is imaginary? ROFL.
The biblical concept of created “kind” probably most closely corresponds to the family level in the current taxonomy. A good rule of thumb is that if two things can breed together, they are of the same created kind. It is a bit more complicated, but this is a good quick measure of a “kind.”
There can be a tremendous amount of variation within a created kind. For example, various types of dogs, such as wolves, dingoes, coyotes, jackals, and domestic dogs, can often breed with one another. When dogs breed together, you get dogs—so there is a dog kind.
Not knowing that you attempt to serve 2 masters (God and evolution) is what hurts you.
Either serve a cobbler god of bioevo or the Creator God Who is omnipotent.
Why do you think that God's Creation is called creation and not evolution?? your compromise defies logic.