Paul E. Michael
Member
Here, yet again, you show that you have not carefully read anything I have written, seeing as you can say something as asinine as that I "believe those men":Gentry and Russel.
That's a silly thing for you to say, seeing as those men, like you, are trying to sell the claim that Revelation was written before A.D. 70, which I'm not buying. What part of my having told you that the clashing claims of those two preterists cancel each other out prompted you to say that I "believe those men"?you believe those men
How is it my problem that you are ignorant of these preterist authors? Obviously it is not my problem.You know, despite your claim that they are promiment, I have never heard of them before.
Of course I have the freedom to not believe preterists' extra-Biblical claims that Peter/Paul were crucified/beheaded by Nero. Do you mean to tell me I do not? All you're doing is begging me to take as axiomatic, things you choose to take as axiomatic. Obviously that's not going to do you any good.You "have the standard" that unless Peter and Paul wrote in a gospel or epistle that they were beheaded or crucified under Nero, you give yourself the freedom not to believe they died.