TRUTH over TRADITION
Member
Where are the holes in preterism? I feel they miss the 'fact' that the parousia was indeed real and physical and they also often do not see the resurrection as actual physical event(S).
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Where are the holes in preterism? I feel they miss the 'fact' that the parousia was indeed real and physical and they also often do not see the resurrection as actual physical event(S).
Correct. Some call it Orthodox, some call it historical and some will call it partial. All pretty much the same and all are looking at some prophecy as still in the future and/or having multiple "levels" of fulfillment (as in dual or near/far prophecy).God put together a great Book didn't He?
What other Book could we have such discussion about?
There is a real difference in pretersim between the full and orthodox . I do know the orthodox believe He will return.
he is addressing full preterism not partial.
Danger! Danger! ;)
Be informed of the root.
Yes, as Lehigh mentioned, preterism isn't a specific teaching of any denomination.... I have a question. What churches teach this unorthodox doctrine, or do preterists tend to be basically unchurched?
.
its hard not to read and form some opinion on revalation on way or another. i do see your point and trust me . i may be the only mid tribber in my churchYes, as Lehigh mentioned, preterism isn't a specific teaching of any denomination.
... and me personally, I prefer my church to NOT teach any one specific End Times position. If my congregation decided to take a doctrinal stance on any one position, I'm outta there.
None of it is carved in stone. None!
Where are the holes in preterism? I feel they miss the 'fact' that the parousia was indeed real and physical and they also often do not see the resurrection as actual physical event(S).
However all Christians believe in the future bodily return of Christ and any church that would refuse to put that in her SOF should be laughed to scorn, as they say.Yes, as Lehigh mentioned, preterism isn't a specific teaching of any denomination.
... and me personally, I prefer my church to NOT teach any one specific End Times position. If my congregation decided to take a doctrinal stance on any one position, I'm outta there.
None of it is carved in stone. None!
However all Christians believe in the future bodily return of Christ and any church that would refuse to put that in her SOF should be laughed to scorn, as they say.
That is not entirely true. That would be based on the CREEDS & would be detrimental to Christianity.
Two points,two lies, one post.