Search results

So why is it not allowed for someone to present his evidence that a certain scripture disagrees with such an obvious fact? If it so easily disproved, shouldn't it be allowed to be presented and then strongly disproved by most members here??

No, that is a separate study of mine which concerns a few scriptures by Paul and Peter. It does not apply to John 1:1c.

Sorry, but I've just returned from a 30-day banishment again. I hope Doulos will still respond here.

So do you mean it is OK to start a discussion "Is Jesus God?," but responders are to answer it in only one way? Shouldn't such a question not be allowed here? Such a question certainly invites responses to both sides of the questions. This seems similar to entrapment.

I believe you are mistaken (concerning the writings of Moses at least). Please review the first 4 or 5 posts of this discussion.

(Post removed. ToS 2.1: "This is a Christian site, therefore, any attempt to put down Christianity (or declare that it is false) and the basic tenets of our Faith will be considered a hostile act. Please read: Statement of Faith." Violation of CF.net Doctrinal Statement (part of our Statement of...

(Post removed. ToS 2.1: "This is a Christian site, therefore, any attempt to put down Christianity (or declare that it is false) and the basic tenets of our Faith will be considered a hostile act. Please read: Statement of Faith." Violation of CF.net Doctrinal Statement (part of our Statement...

The vast majority of contemporary New Testament textual critics … have concluded that neither the longer nor shorter endings [Mark 16:9-20] were originally part of Mark's Gospel. This conclusion extends back as far as the middle of the nineteenth century. Harnack, for instance, was convinced...

YHWH are the English letters which are used to represent the Hebrew letters of God's personal name. YHWH has been transliterated into English as "Yahweh," "Yehowah," and the traditional "Jehovah." It is similar to the name of the Messiah (probably Yehoshua) being transliterated by the NT...

The Name was known, but the meaning of the Name was not. Moses' mother's name for instance included the name of God. But, more important, God told Moses' the meaning of His name as "I Will Be" not "I Am" as the first part of this discussion shows. Furthermore, in the very next verse after the...

The conflict is one of accuracy in translation. Furthermore, there is certainly a difference between translating ehyeh asher ehyeh as "I am what I am" or "I will be what I will be" and translating ehyeh itself as "I Am" or "I will be."

No, Moses asked what His name was. Or, more accurately, he asked God what his name means. The New Bible Dictionary, Douglas (ed.), 1962, pp. 478, 479, published by Eerdmans, explains it well: “Strictly speaking, Yahweh [or ‘Jehovah’ in traditional English form] is the only ‘name’ of God ...

The translation of ehyeh as “I Am” (at Ex. 3:14 only) in most Bibles is based primarily on the KJV tradition. Note that even some trinitarian Bibles go against tradition and translate it correctly as “I will be” either in the text or as an alternate translation in footnotes. For example, the...

And, finally, the last use of ehyeh in all the writings of Moses: Deuteronomy 31:23 YHWH speaks and says "I will be (ehyeh) with you" ……………….. And how were these verses translated by a famed pre-Christian translation? Gen. 26:3 in the ancient Greek translation (the Septuagint) - ehyeh...

All uses of ehyeh in Exodus: Exodus 3:12 YHWH speaks and says “I will be (ehyeh) with you” Exodus 3:14 (discussed at end) Exodus 4:12 YHWH speaks and says "I will be (ehyeh) with your mouth" Exodus 4:15 YHWH speaks and says "I will be (ehyeh) with your mouth"

All the uses of ehyeh in Genesis: Gen. 26:3 - YHWH speaks and says "I WILL BE (ehyeh) with you" Gen. 31:3 - YHWH speaks and says "I WILL BE (ehyeh) with you"

Has anyone actually looked at all the uses of ehyeh in all the writings of Moses?

You can see that this was a full month before I was banned for a month. Nothing was deleted in that discussion.

Doulos, I kept looking and finally found what you were referring to: http://www.christianforums.net/Fellowship/index.php?threads/truth-in-translation.51633/ If you will examine it, I think you will see that you did not really answer my questions there. And that was just a small part of my five...

So, I'm back to trying to find anyone who will objectively discuss my complete analysis of John's use of theos and all his usages of proper examples of constructions which are parallel to his John 1:1c. found in Lessons A-E on page 2 above.