Search results

Yes, I said that earlier in the thread.

Yep, and during ww2 the British were also promising the Arab nationalists the entire territory. Then hot potatoed it to the UN.

I apologize, I keep bringing up the ottomans, but that was the great war and they dudolved in 1922. The Arab national movement was already underway.

I am aware. What I am saying is that historical the situation is complicated. Considering that Jordan,Egypt,Lebanon, Saudiarabia, and Iraq were all part of the rise of Arab Nationalism that fought with the Ottomon Empire for control of the area and the creation of the state of Israel was...

As I mentioned. Its a complicated history due to how Gaza was formed without input from the people that lived there. Hamas is not the good guys and depending on who us leadership in Israel neither are they. You have multiple groups all trying to have control over the same land. Sometimes Israel...

Then you have to add in that the Camp David Accords was a treaty and agreement between Israel and Egyp about the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Jordan formerly controlled the West Bank, but it went under Israel's control and the Gaza Strip was formerly Egyptian Territory. The deal was to lead to...

Yes, there is. Lot of hate towards Israley citizens in both Gaza and the West Bank. It's not so simple however. Considering That the state of Israel has been contested in the modern sense due to the collapse of Soviet control and the splintering of the Arab league, and Western meddling has...

This gets tricky because this falls into 2 areas. A school that recieves federal grants can't discriminate, the school is a religous institution. If the school abandoned federal grants and accreditation then it could discriminate.

Unless the organization is specificly about Atheism. Then yes.

Do you by chance think that driving means you are operating a motor vehicle under commerce?

Snark doesn't change that you removed context.

You quoted it put of context. If you read Revelations the mark comes after the acceptance of the beastof the sea as ruler.

It's such a hoax that the same president that takes all credit for the creation of said vaccine is also loosening restrictions for those who didn't take it. If it was a ploy to infect everyone, why not make it worse for those who didn't take it?

You left out that the people getting the mark do so under the influence and worship of the beast. Meaning they take it willingly

I would say that this really is not damaging to Christianity. It's like flat Earth, it attracts people who need something to convince themselves they are over something. Considering the mark has to be known and taken willingly, the vaccine makes no sense.

Not to mention that the only motive is just Satan wants it to happen. Why? Who knows, small traces of graphene that may or may not have been in a run of one of the vaccines somehow means a large chunk of the world is full of nanobots.

So we dint have an objective, we have a scienfiction concept of their being enough graphine in an injection to act as a sensor for some network we don't know even exists? Sounds like motivated reasoning. You have your enemy (satan) The motive isn't necessary because you just plugged in Satan...

I ask specificly about claims made. If someone tells me that people who took the vaccines are supposed to be dieing in droves, I want to see the evidence.

Yes, I am up to date on all my vaccines including the Covid vaccine and the boosters. You literally don't understand the articles you are referencing. You are asking if I want a vaccine that has less then 0.01% chance of even injuring me. That's less dangerous then driving to India polish, and...

That is not what your paper said. If you want to play fallacy bingo what you are doing is called motivated reasoning or begging the question. You did not demonstrate that the people died by the vaccine. Free already pointed out the paper said "other" causes. You are assuming covid. No, I have...