Search results

  1. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Matthew G and Vaccine, I was honored to have met you. Stay strong in your faith. Never let the word of men corrupt the Word of God, for there is one and one salvation alone: the Word of God. Instead, the word of men leads to perdition. It has always happened like that, even more so now, in the...
  2. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Adam, Isn’t it ironic that you, who claim science is on your side, so far you have showed NONE? And you who claim logic is on your side, yet again so far you have showed NONE? I’m sure that you don’t even know your OWN cosmology, because of some things that you say, like this: If you...
  3. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    UNFAIR GAME: PUTTING THE BLAME ON PEOPLE In its endless patching of their big bang cosmology, mainstream, instead of admitting that some of the previous assumptions or postulations were wrong, alters its cosmology behind closed doors, and then claim that their model has always been so...
  4. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Is that all? You threatened me in the old big bang thread that you will come here and show my "logical fallacies" and in general where I'm wrong, and then you just say "Gish gallop"? Really? Is this your logic? And is this your science? Well, in that case, I'm not surprised that you have what...
  5. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Welcome to the thread, Sparrowhawke. And thanks for allowing it to me. Yes, it is. And mainstream is aware of their huge problem. I already gave a quote (and the respective link), I’m sure you can’t find many more by your own. But in general, instead of believing one or the other, why...
  6. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Turnorburn, who is it exactly that you’re talking to? Sorry, but can’t figure that out.
  7. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Why? Big bang is dead only because of accelerated expansion, no need for other evidence. Such evidence is only required if you want to find out which part of the physics is actually real. No. And yes. Let me explain: I’m not usually part of any group. However, at this particular moment I am...
  8. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    No. It’s not electricity per se (or electromagnetism, since they unified the two long time ago) what keeps planets in orbit, for example. But each time you hear some people claiming Einstein, take out your comb and a piece of paper and prove them wrong. And then tell them that you didn’t have to...
  9. A

    [_ Old Earth _] Big Bang = Big Fail

    Adam, isn't the very fact that you don't want to participate in my thread admission that what you believe is (OK, I'll settle for half-way: COULD BE) wrong? If I would be wrong, then you shouldn't have any problems proving that, don't you think? Looking forward for you to correct me on...
  10. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    IS IT TRUE THAT SCIENCE FIGURED EVERYTHING OUT? Isn’t it ironic how evolutionists claim all the science is on their side? But do other “sciences” perform any better than their cosmology? Let’s see for example the economics (or finances). Yes, they claimed they figured economics all out too...
  11. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    ARE THERE OTHER PLANETS OUT THERE? There are usually two things claimed in favor of other planets out there (beyond our solar system). The wobble (or another expression with close meaning) of the star, claimed to be due to a planet orbiting it. And the reduction in brightness of the star at...
  12. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    A SUPERNOVA WITH PROBLEMS How about distances to supernovas? How do they determine those? Let’s take for example the most famous supernova: SN 1987A. I will mostly address this .PDF: http://www.astroex.org/english/exercise1/pdf/3-exercise1-low.pdf but most of that text (pretty much...
  13. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    HOW FAR THE STARS REALLY ARE? I won’t address this here in full, because it’s one of the most important things I will talk about in my next thread, The Biblical cosmology. But I can say here a few things. There are 2 main things used for “measurement” of star distances: the triangle...
  14. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE How old is the universe? Well, we already know the formal claim, now let’s see if that’s true. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe “The problem of determining the age of the universe is closely tied to the problem of determining the...
  15. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    THE MOST PROFOUND PROBLEM IN PHYSICS: Just wanted to give a quote to show how much of a problem is accelerated expansion for mainstream – in its own words: http://news.nationalgeographic.co.uk/news/2012/02/120215-dark-energy-antimatter-physics-alternate-space-science/ “In 1998...
  16. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    MORE FUNNY STORIES: One of the problems in mainstream cosmology is the number 1. Don’t laugh, because you don’t know how much of a problem that number is for them. It even makes them lost in their geometries, or metrics… There is this very important thing called the density parameter...
  17. A

    [_ Old Earth _] Big Bang = Big Fail

    For me that wasn’t obvious at all - since your screen name. I had to read your posts to figure that out. I assure you that my sentiments are not only plausible, but actually real… And wouldn’t you argue against yourself? Because I’m sure that my sentiments are exactly yours, only at...
  18. A

    [_ Old Earth _] Big Bang = Big Fail

    Thanks, Sparrowhawke, it worked. See you all in my thread: "no big bang".
  19. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    THE FUNNY STORY OF BIG BANG: This story is quite popular among YECs (pity if you aren’t one, you’d have so much fun at the expense of evolution in general!). When Lemaitre put together his big bang (by the way it’s not his at all, but another time about that), he was reported as claiming...
  20. A

    [_ Old Earth _] no big bang

    Conclusion: Big bang fails at each and every level. Observationally: cosmic voids (what exactly would convince matter to gather preferentially? there can be NOTHING preferential in the formal universe!), peculiar velocities (what exactly would convince certain matter to move...
Back
Top