This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
jasoncran
No but i have been. I have also studied under some of the senior muslim scholars of the world. So i do have a comprehensive understanding of Islamic Aqidah, Kalam, Fiqh, Hadith, Tafsir, Sirah, etc.
One thing i do know is when it is being misrepresented, and that is never a good...
mdo757
I thought this would be a nice Christian forum, but i find its full of mad mannered people who claim Christ.
Al-(i)lah wasn't a "personal" name, an ilah is a "diety", and it was a title to signify the main one, the Creator. When the early Christians set out to evangelise they did not...
I continued the point i was making to mdo757. That if its ok to refer to El Shaddai as God, Theo etc, then using Allah is also permissible. As all of them have their root in paganism.
Because you dont think God (or rather.. its german root), Theo (Greek), etc were not used for pagan gods before Christians used them for Elohim? So the position of Allah is the same as Theo, God etc..
I don't know what I am talking about?
I'm not sure what your qualifications are when it comes to knowledge of Islam, but I have spent 4 years of intensive studies under Islamic scholars around the world. So i would believe im in a better position than your average joe who read an article or two...
Well if people are going to get stuck on the "personal" name of God, then remember that "God" is neither His name, and therefore "God" could be considered a false god too. If we accept that the word Allah comes from Al-Ilah, thus rendering it The Diety, The God, then it is no more or less a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.