a topic for gary

[huj05]

just because gary bee likes to promote his very skewed right wing websites, I too, will romote some skewed and not 100% truthfull (but very informative) websites about why people are atheists.

http://www.godneverexisted.com
http://truechristian.com
http://www.evilbible.com
http://www.thebricktestament.com/

i hope you enjpoy these sites gary, read through an try to defend your religion from most of that.

Some, I as an atheist could defend. Alot i dont know abotu at all, and alot i 100% agree with.

 

[Gary]

Thanks huj05. I was an atheist for 30+ years.... so I think I can represent atheism better than those sites!

I agree that the sites you presented are not very truthful.

Why not read this?... it may help you..

http://www.geocities.com/gary_bee_za/bi ... iction.htm

Enjoy!

: :

 

[huj05]

well, i clicked your linked, clicked anothe rlink, read 3 of the 101 contradictions uncontradicted, and, well, i dont believe it. what makes one part of the bible a typo, and another part not?

the only parts that are typos, are the ones that disprove christianity.


Also, to note. one would think, the earliest form written, would be closest to the truth, aka the OT and the NT. however, it seems that not many follow their words to be true, because contradictions were found, and new versions were written.

 

[Gary]

Also, to note. one would think, the earliest form written, would be closest to the truth, aka the OT and the NT. however, it seems that not many follow their words to be true, because contradictions were found, and new versions were written.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Please explain further.

 

[huj05]

trying to think of the simplest way to explain it.



You have to write a paper about the civil war.

you find a letter FROM the battle of gettysburg, that is very thourough, documents alot of things from it ect.

then you do a google search, and come up with a similar letter, that covers the same key points, but has some diffrences in it.


What would you believe? the one written THEN as it happened (or recently afer) or the one written several hundred years after?

 

[Sara929]

A manuscripts age is in no way a reflection of its accuracy hun. Try reading up more on that subject, you might find out some interesting things.

 

[huj05]

it just seems to defy logic though.

eye witness accounts are always better than 3rd person accounts.

Interviewing a soldier from iwo jima, the day after, compared to today, would probably be strikingly diffrent. story changed a little over time

 

[Gary]

A manuscripts age is in no way a reflection of its accuracy hun. Try reading up more on that subject, you might find out some interesting things.

Good point.

Here is some information....
http://scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/papyrus ... ripts.html
and
http://www.shoutingman.com/bible/ntrely/

 

[evanman]

This is not a topic that should be discussed on this particular section.

This section is about Christianity and other religions.

If you want to challenge any person do it through PM.