S
Solo
Guest
I find it very interesting that Birds of a Feather, flock together on this forum.
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
I prefer to be an eagle. :DSolo said:I find it very interesting that Birds of a Feather, flock together on this forum.
Solo said:I find it very interesting that Birds of a Feather, flock together on this forum.
Solo said:I find it very interesting that Birds of a Feather, flock together on this forum.
unred typo said:I have to leave on an adventure. I'll give you a couple days to catch up. :wink:
unred typo said:I had noticed that you will often join with Dave…, oscar, golfjack, jgredline and JM in getting all ruffled and not answering my posts. I guess you wouldn't be early birds.
I have to leave on an adventure. I'll give you a couple days to catch up. :wink:
jgredline said:I find it interesting that the above mentioned names are all Born Again...They all believe Jesus is God, That Jesus is the second person of the triune God and oh, yes, we also believe the bible... :wink:
jgredline said:I find it interesting that the above mentioned names are all Born Again...They all believe Jesus is God, That Jesus is the second person of the triune God and oh, yes, we also believe the bible... :wink:
I have to say something here. There is another "flock" on this forum - those who resort to rhetoric when their arguments do not carry the day. We all know the posters who respond to solid argument with statements that avoid the actual matter at issue, and only serve to tear down and smear others by ad hominem. From wikipedia:
There are those who are not influenced by empty rhetoric and see it as the act of desperation that it obviously is. The problem is that not all have the good fortune to be trained to discern good arguments from empty rhetoric. It is these people that are, unfortunately, at risk from the purveyors of rhetoric.argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally argument against the person), personal attack or you-too argument, involves replying to an argument or assertion by attacking the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself. It is a logical fallacy.
mutzrein said:Seems like JG is crowing again & wants to redefine what it means to be 'born again' :wink:
Yes, Drew... this site used to not tolerate constant fingerpointing and personal attacks the way it does now. In fact it's the standard by those who are suppose to be setting an example. Lets just say the standards here took a nose dive over the past months.Drew said:There are those who are not influenced by empty rhetoric and see it as the act of desperation that it obviously is. The problem is that not all have the good fortune to be trained to discern good arguments from empty rhetoric. It is these people that are, unfortunately, at risk from the purveyors of rhetoric.
So I will grant this to those who resort to this tactic - they are dangerous, very dangerous, precisely because, sadly enough, this tactic does indeed work in influencing the minds of those who, perhaps through no fault of their own, have not been trained to reject such fluff.
I encourage all readers - think for yourselves! Weigh the content of real arguments and use your own God-given faculties to come to your own decisions. Please do your part to stem the influence that empty propaganda has on so many. Each person that takes the hard road of thinking for themselves and refusing to be swayed by the "ye are of your father the devil" crowd, advances the kingdom a little bit.
Yes, Drew... this site used to not tolerate constant fingerpointing and personal attacks the way it does now. In fact it's the standard by those who are suppose to be setting an example. Lets just say the standards here took a nose dive over the past months.
Lovely I agree, this 'topic' should be locked, it's a pitiful example of christianity.